green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Mireles-Valdez v. Ashcroft
See Wilson v. INS, 43 F.3d 211, 213 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 516 U.S. 811 , 116 S.Ct. 59 , 133 L.Ed.2d 23 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Blecker v. State
See Rehabilitation Ass'n of Va., Inc. v. Kozlowski, 42 F. 3d 1444 , 1447 (4th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 811 , 116 S.Ct. 60 , 133 L.Ed. 2d 23 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. City of Enid
See Edwards v. International Union, United Plant Guard Workers, 46 F.3d 1047, 1050 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 811 , 116 S.Ct. 60 , 133 L.Ed.2d 23 (1995). 16 Though the two year limitations period governing both of Mr. Smith's § 1983 claims is a creature of state law, see Abbitt v. Franklin, 731 F.2d 661, 663 (10th Cir.1984) (en banc), federal law governs the question of accrual of federal causes of action, and thus, dictates when the statute of limitations begins to run for purposes of § 1983.
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. City of Enid Ex Rel. Enid City Commission
See Edwards v. International Union, United Plant Guard Workers, 46 F.3d 1047, 1050 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 811 , 116 S.Ct. 60 , 133 L.Ed.2d 23 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Rehabilitation Ass'n of Virginia, Inc. v. Metcalf
See Rehabilitation Ass’n of Virginia v. Kozlowski, 42 F.3d 1444 (4th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 811 , 116 S.Ct. 60 , 133 L.Ed.2d 23 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Garcia v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
See Edwards v. Int’l Union, 46 F.3d 1047, 1055 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 811 , 116 S.Ct. 60 , 133 L.Ed.2d 23 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Stohler v. Menke
See Rehabilitation Association of Virginia, Inc. v. Kozlowski, 42 F.3d 1444 (4th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 811 , 116 S.Ct. 60 , 133 L.Ed.2d 23 (1995), and other cases cited at n. 3 infra. .
discussed
Cited "see"
Stohler v. Menke
See Rehabilitation Association of Virginia, Inc. v. Kozlowski, 42 F.3d 1444 (4th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 811 , 116 S.Ct. 60 , 133 L.Ed.2d 23 (1995), and other cases cited at n. 3 infra. [2] The Secretary correctly points outs out that since the events which gave rise to plaintiffs motion occurred after the filing of the complaint, the motion should properly be termed a motion to "supplement" under FED.
cited
Cited "see"
McAmis v. Wallace
See Rehabilitation Assoc, of Virginia, Inc. v. Kozlowski, 42 F.3d 1444, 1448 (4th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 60 , 133 L.Ed.2d 23 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
McDonald v. Raytheon Aircraft Corp.
See Edwards v. Inter national Union, UPGWA, 46 F.3d 1047, 1053-54 (10th Cir.) (discussing accrual under the LMRA), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 60 , 133 L.Ed.2d 23 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schlotz v. Hyundai Motor Co.
See Dykema v. Volkswagenwerk AG, 189 Wis.2d 206 , 525 N.W.2d 754, 758 (App.1994) (addressing the federal preemption issue and holding that plaintiffs defective design and negligence claims, based on the manufacturer’s failure to provide adequate lower pelvic restraint, would establish a different safety standard from that required by federal law), review denied, — Wis.2d-, 531 N.W.2d 326 (1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 60 , 133 L.Ed.2d 23 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES, INC. v. Mills
See Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co. v. Luckie, 85 N.Y.2d 193 , 623 N.Y.S.2d 800 , 647 N.E.2d 1308 , cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 59 , 133 L.Ed.2d 23 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Francisco Vasquez-Balandran
See Wilson v. I.N.S., 43 F.3d 211, 214-15 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 59 , 133 L.Ed.2d 23 (1995) (explaining that federal law governs the application of federal legislation in the absence of clear language to the contrary) (quoting Yanez-Popp v. INS, 998 F.2d 231 (4th Cir.1993)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cuevas
See also White, 17 F.3d at 479 ; Chong v. INS, 890 F.2d 284 (11th Cir.1989) (per curiam); accord Wilson v. INS, 43 F.3d 211, 215 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 59 , 133 L.Ed.2d 23 (1995); Ruis-Rubio v. INS, 380 F.2d 29 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 944 , 88 S.Ct. 302 , 19 L.Ed.2d 302 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Walker v. Runyon
Id. at 164-65, 103 S.Ct. at 2290-91 ; see also Edwards v. International Union, United Plant Guard Workers, 46 F.3d 1047, 1051-52 (10th Cir.) (discussing the nature of hybrid suits), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 60 , 133 L.Ed.2d 23 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dykema
v.
Volkswagenwerk AG
v.
Volkswagenwerk AG
No. 94-1910.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1995.
Published
Ct. App. Wis. Certiorari denied.