green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.9 score
“pinder ii”
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Jean v. Collins
See also Taylor v. Waters, 81 F.3d 429, 433 (4th Cir.1996); Pinder v. Johnson, 54 F.3d 1169, 1173 (4th Cir.1995) (en bane), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 5.Ct. 530, 133 L.Ed.2d 436 (1995); Pritchett v. Alford, 973 F.2d 307, 312 (4th Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Quiroz
See State v. White, 340 N.C. 264, 294 , 457 S.E.2d 841, 858 ("Defendant must specifically object to the qualifications of an expert witness in order to preserve the objection.") (citation omitted), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 994 , 133 L.Ed. 2d 436 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Pettis
See State v. White, 340 N.C. 264, 293-94 , 457 S.E.2d 841, 858 (“While the better practice may be to make a formal tender of a witness as an expert, such a tender is not required.”), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 994 , 133 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. DUPREE
See State v. White, 340 N.C. 264 , 299, 457 S.E.2d 841 , 861, cert. denied, 516 U.S. 994 , 133 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Monk
See State v.White, 340 N.C. 264 , 299, 457 S.E.2d 841 , 861, cert. denied, 516 U.S. 994 , 133 L.
cited
Cited "see"
IN THE MATTER OF CB
See State v. White, 340 N.C. 264 , 457 S.E.2d 841 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 994 , 133 L.
cited
Cited "see"
In the Matter of Cb
See State v. White, 340 N.C. 264 , 457 S.E.2d 841 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 994 , 133 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Prevatte
See State v. White, 340 N.C. 264, 276 , 457 S.E.2d 841, 848 (no ex parte hearing was required on defendant’s motion for funds to hire private investigator), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 994 , 133 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Peter Clayton McClendon v. City of Columbia, City of Columbia James R. Carney
(2×)
See Pinder v. Johnson, 54 F.3d 1169, 1175 (4th Cir.)( en banc ), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 994 , 116 S.Ct. 530 , 133 L.Ed.2d 436 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Davidson v. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
See State v. White, 340 N.C. 264, 293-94 , 457 S.E.2d 841, 858 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 994 , 133 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Abdeljalil v. City of Fort Worth
See Finder v. Johnson, 54 F.3d 1169, 1176-77 (4th Cir.1995) (en banc), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 994 , 116 S.Ct. 530 , 133 L.Ed.2d 436 (1995). 16 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Holden
“Any expression as to the merits of the case, or any intimation of contempt for a party or for counsel, may be highly deleterious to that party’s position in the eyes of the jury.” State v. *424 Staley, 292 N.C. 160, 162 , 232 S.E.2d 680, 682 (1977); accord State v. White, 340 N.C. 264, 297 , 457 S.E.2d 841, 860 , cert. denied, — U.S. -, 133 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bishop
See State v. White, 340 N.C. 264, 292 , 457 S.E.2d 841, 857-58 , cert. denied, 116 U.S. 530 , 133 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Norwood
See State v. White, 340 N.C. 264, 278 , 457 S.E.2d 841, 849 , cert. denied,-U.S.-, 133 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Harter v. Vernon
See Pinder v. Johnson, 54 F.3d 1169, 1173 (4th Cir.) (holding that the rights must be clearly established in a particularized sense), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 530 , 133 L.Ed.2d 436 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate of Phillips v. District of Columbia
See, e.g., Pinder v. Johnson, 54 F.3d 1169, 1175 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 994 , 116 S.Ct. 530 , 133 L.Ed.2d 436 (1995) (because custody — element the Supreme Court made "the crux of the special relationship rule” — was lacking, plaintiff did not allege the violation of a clearly established constitutional right and officer entitled to qualified immunity). 13 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate Of Anthony Sean Phillips, Sr.
See, e.g., Pinder v. Johnson, 54 F.3d 1169, 1175 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 994 , 116 S.Ct. 530 , 133 L.Ed.2d 436 (1995) (because custody — element the Supreme Court made "the crux of the special relationship rule" — was lacking, plaintiff did not allege the violation of a clearly established constitutional right and officer entitled to qualified immunity). 13 This is not to say that state law tort claims are not available to the Firefighters.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Diggs v. Novant Health, Inc.
See also State v. White, 340 N.C. 264, 294 , 457 S.E.2d 841, 858 . (“Nurses are qualified to render expert opinions as to the cause of a physical injury even though they are not licensed to diagnose illnesses or prescribe treatment, and there is no basis for any preference of licensed physicians for such medical testimony.”), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 994 , 133 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Pickard
Ed. 2d 124 (1978). ‘Furthermore, it is well recognized that a trial judge has a duty to question a witness in order to clarify his testimony or to elicit overlooked pertinent facts.’ State v. Rogers, 326 N.C. at 220, 341 S.E.2d at 723; see also State v. Jackson, 306 N.C. 642, 651 , 295 S.E.2d 383, 388 (1982). ‘In evaluating whether a judge’s comments cross into the realm of impermissible opinion, a totality of the circumstances test is utilized.’ [State v.] Larrimore, 340 N.C. [119,] 155, 456 S.E.2d [789,]808 [(1995)]. ‘The trial court has a duty to control the examination of witne…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Soto v. Carrasquillo
(2×)
See, e.g, Pinder v. Johnson, 54 F.3d 1169 (4th Cir.) (en banc) (rejecting due process claim based upon police failure to protect domestic violence victim), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 530 , 133 L.Ed.2d 436 (1995); Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep't, 901 F.2d 696 (9th Cir.1988)(same). 34 However, Soto alleges more than a mere failure to protect.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Veneri
v.
White, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Pittsburgh
v.
White, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Pittsburgh
No. 95-6157.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 27, 1995.
Published
Citer courts: N.D. West Virginia (2)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.