green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.9 score
“a plaintiff must allege injury from the defendant's acquisition or control of an interest in a rico enterprise, in addition to injury from the predicate acts”
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A. v. Clifford
a plaintiff must allege injury from the defendant's acquisition or control of an interest in a rico enterprise, in addition to injury from the predicate acts
cited
Cited "see"
Dark-Eyes v. Commissioner of Revenue Services
See State v. Spears, 234 Conn. 78, 88-94 , 662 A.2d 80 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1009 , 116 S. Ct. 565 , 133 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bessette v. Avco Financial Services, Inc.
(2×)
See Compagnie De Reassurance D’Ile De France v. New England Reinsurance Corp., 57 F.3d 56 , 91 (1st Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1009 , 116 S.Ct. 564 , 133 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Skakel v. Benedict
Accordingly, care must be taken to effectuate all provisions of the statute.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Szymkiewicz, 237 Conn. 613, 621 , 678 A.2d 473 (1996); see State v. Spears, 234 Conn. 78, 93 , 662 A.2d 80 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1009 , 116 S. Ct. 565 , 133 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
General Motors Corp. v. Dohmann
Accordingly, care must be taken to effectuate all provisions of the statute.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Ferrigno v. Cromwell Development Associates, supra, 244 Conn. 196 ; State v. Szymkiewicz, 237 Conn. 613, 621 , 678 A.2d 473 (1996); see State v. Spears, 234 Conn. 78, 93 , 662 A.2d 80 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1009 , 116 S. Ct. 565 , 133 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commercial Union Insurance v. Seven Provinces Insurance
See Compagnie De Reassurance D'Ile De France v. New England Reinsurance Corp., 57 F.3d 56 , 72 (1st Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1109 , 116 S.Ct. 564 , 133 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995); North River, 52 F.3d at 1212 ; Unigard Sec.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ferrigno v. Cromwell Development Associates
Accordingly, care must be taken to effectuate all provisions of the statute.’ ” (Citation omitted.) State v. Szymkiewicz, 237 Conn. 613, 621 , 678 A.2d 473 (1996); see State v. Spears, 234 Conn. 78, 93 , 662 A.2d 80 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1009 , 116 S. Ct. 565 , 133 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ruddock v. Burrowes
See State v. Spears, 234 Conn. 78, 90 , 662 A.2d 80 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1009 , 116 S. Ct. 565 , 133 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Guckenberger v. Boston University
See Compagnie de Reassurance d’lle de France v. New England Reinsurance Corp., 825 F.Supp. 370, 380 (D.Mass. 1993), modified, 57 F.3d 56 (1st Cir.1995), and cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 564 , 133 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
General Cigar Co. v. CR Carriers, Inc.
See Aldridge v. Lily-Tulip, Inc. Salary Retirement Plan Benefits Comm., 741 F.Supp. 906 (S.D.Ga.) aff'd in part and rev’d in part, 953 F.2d 587 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, —U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 565 , 133 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Discon, Incorporated v. Nynex Corporation, Nynex Material Enterprises, New York Telephone Company, Robert J. Eckenrode, and Bernard O'Reilly
Similarly, other circuits have held that, in order to state a cause of action under subsection 1962(b), “plaintiffs must allege an ‘acquisition’ injury, analogous to the ‘use or investment injury1 required under § 1962(a) to show injury by reason of a § 1962(b) violation.” Danielsen v. Burnside-Ott Aviation Training Center, Inc., 941 F.2d 1220, 1231 (D.C.Cir.1991); accord Compagnie De Reassurance D’Ile De France v. New England Reinsurance Corp., 57 F.3d 56 , 92 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 564 , 133 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995); Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp., 4 F.3d…
cited
Cited "see"
Cambridge Plating Co. v. Napco, Inc.
See Compagnie De Reassurance D’Ile De France v. New England Reinsurance Corp., 57 F.3d 56 , 72 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 564 , 133 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mercer David Grayson v. K Mart Corporation, Cross-Appellee. Ronald L. Braley v. K Mart Corporation, Cross-Appellee. Tony M. Arrington v. K Mart Corporation, Cross-Appellee. Ricky D. Sallee v. K Mart Corporation, Cross-Appellee. James L. Steadman v. K Mart Corporation, Cross-Appellee. John D. Thompson v. K Mart Corporation, Cross-Appellee. Obediah Sconiers, Movants, Carl Helton, Charles W. Kempton, James E. Taylor, Bob Williams, David Jack Wright v. K Mart Corporation
See Aldridge v. Lily-Tulip, Inc. Salary Retirement Plan Benefits Comm., 40 F.3d 1202 , 1208 (11th Cir.1994) (recognizing that certification under § 1292(b) brings the district court's entire order before the appellate court on interlocutory appeal), cert. den., --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 565 , 133 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995). 43 Section 7(b) of the ADEA (codified at 29 U.S.C. § 626 (b)) incorporates the opt-in class action provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act (codified at 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grayson v. K Mart Corp.
See Aldridge v. Lily-Tulip, Inc. Salary Retirement Plan Benefits Comm., 40 F.3d 1202 , 1208 (11th Cir.1994) (recognizing that certification under § 1292(b) brings the district court’s entire order before the appellate court on interlocutory appeal), cert. den., - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 565 , 133 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Koff v. Conn. Medical Examining Board, No. Cv 98 0492722 (Feb. 9, 1999)
In seeking to discern that intent, we look to the words of the statute itself, to the legislative history and circumstances surrounding its enactment, to the legislative policy it was designed to implement, and to its relationship to existing legislation and common law principles governing the same general subject matter. . . ." (Brackets omitted; citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Assn. of Not-for-Profit Providers for the Aging v. Dept. of Social Services , supra, 244 Conn. 391 ; see also State v. Spears , 234 Conn. 78 , 86-87 , cert denied, 516 U.S. 1009 , 116 S.Ct. 565 , …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. Dawson, Inc.
See Logan Equipment Corporation v. Simon Aerials, Inc., 736 F.Supp. 1188, 1200 (D.Mass.1990) (setting forth exceptions to general rule that promissory statements of future events are not actionable). “[Statements of present intention as to future conduct,” such as statements that a party would pay the installments due in the future as part of the purchase price in a contract, “may be the basis for a fraud action if ... the statements misrepresent the actual intention of the speaker and were relied upon by the recipient to his damage.” 210 McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Norton Company, 4…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Play Time, Inc. v. LDDS Metromedia Communications, Inc.
Roche, 109 F.3d at 829 ; see also Compagnie De Reassurance D’Ile De France v. New England Reinsurance Corp., 57 F.3d 56 , 90 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 564 , 133 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995); Clinton Hosp., 907 F.2d at 1265-66 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Compagnie de Reassurance d'Ile de France
v.
New England Reinsurance Corp.
v.
New England Reinsurance Corp.
No. 95-478.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 4, 1995.
Published
Citer courts: District of Columbia (1)
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.