green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State of New Jersey v. Amed Ingram
See State v. Ball, 141 N.J. 142, 156 (1995) (noting that state courts "heed federal legislative history and case law 30 A-1787-16T6 in construing" New Jersey's RICO statute, which was modeled on the federal RICO statute), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1075 , 116 S. Ct. 779 , 133 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Siferd
See State v. Ball (1995), 141 N.J. 142, 173-74 , 661 A.2d 251 , certiorari denied, Mocco v. New Jersey (1996), 516 U.S. 1075 , 116 S.Ct. 779 , 133 L.Ed.2d 731 . 57 .
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Whitlow
(4×)
See State v. Henry (1995), 271 Mont. 491, 496 , 898 P.2d 1195, 1198 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1075 , 116 S.Ct. 779 , 133 L.Ed.2d 730 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. St. John
(2×)
See State v. Henry (1995), 271 Mont. 491, 496 , 898 P.2d 1195, 1198 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1075 , 116 S.Ct. 779 , 133 L.Ed.2d 730 (1996). ¶41 Second, as to St.
cited
Cited "see"
KARO MARKETING v. Playdrome America
See State v. Ball, 141 N.J. 142 , 661 A. 2d 251 (1995), cert. denied sub nom., Mocco v. New Jersey, 516 U.S. 1075 , 116 S.Ct. 779 , 133 L.Ed. 2d 731 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bisaccia
See State v. Ball, 141 N.J. 142, 167 , 661 A. 2d 251 (1995), cert. denied sub nom Mocco v. New Jersey, 516 U.S. 1075 , 116 S.Ct. 779 , 133 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Roldan
Cases 508, 515 (1881)); accord State v. Ball, 141 N.J. 142, 178-79 , 661 A.2d 251 (1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1075 , 116 S.Ct. 779 , 133 L.Ed.2d 731 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hill v. Taconic Developmental Disabilities Services Office
(2×)
See also Yoonessi v. State Univ. of New York, 56 F.3d 10 , 12 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1075 , 116 S.Ct. 779 , 133 L.Ed.2d 730 (1996) (affirming dismissal of 1981 claim on Eleventh Amendment grounds); Allen v. Cuomo, 100 F.3d 253, 260-61 (2d Cir.1996) (affirming dismissal of 1983 claim on Eleventh Amendment grounds).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Joann S. Reed, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. A.W. Lawrence & Co., Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
(4×)
See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(1) (1994); 29 C.F.R. § 1601.13 (a) (EEOC’s deferral policy and procedures); 29 C.F.R. § 1601.74 (1995) (SDHR accepted as a “deferral agency”); see also Yoonessi v. State University of New York, 862 F.Supp. 1005, 1013 (W.D.N.Y.1994), appeal denied, 56 F.3d 10 (2d Cir.1995), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 779 , 133 L.Ed.2d 730 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Yoonessi
v.
State University of New York (Buffalo)
v.
State University of New York (Buffalo)
No. 95-877.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 16, 1996.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.