green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
4.2 score
G Cite
cited 5× by 3 distinct cases ·
“Arbitration should not be compelled when the party who seeks to compel arbitration has waived that right.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Covington”
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Frank v. American General Finance, Inc.
arbitration should not be compelled when the party who seeks to compel arbitration has waived that right.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Russell
(2×)
See KPERS v. Reimer & Koger Assoc., Inc., 61 F.3d 608 , 614 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1114 , 116 S.Ct. 915 , 133 L.Ed.2d 845 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Cedric M. Richeson and Emily Richeson v. Christopher S. Saltzman
See Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Mutual Trading Corp., 63 F.3d 516, 525 (7th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1115 , 116 S.Ct. 916 , 133 L.Ed.2d 846 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Janis v. AMP, INC.
(2×)
Smith v. Shallcross, 165 Pa.Super. 472 , 69 A.2d 156 (1949); see also DeMuth v. Miller, 438 Pa.Super. 437 , 652 A.2d 891 (1995), appeal denied, 542 Pa. 634 , 665 A.2d 469 (1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1114 , 116 S.Ct. 916 , 133 L.Ed.2d 846 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Invessys, Inc. v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Ltd.
Compare, e.g., Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Mutual Trading Corp., 63 F.3d 516, 526 (7th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1115 , 116 S.Ct. 916 , 133 L.Ed.2d 846 (1996) (holding that expenses paid for computer-assisted research were recoverable), and United Nuclear Corp. v. Cannon, 564 F.Supp. 581, 591-92 (D.R.I.1983) (Selya, J.) (same), with, e.g., Standley v. Chilhowee R-IV Sch.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ilick v. Miller
Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 572 F.Supp. 354 (D.D.C.)(rev’d in part, 746 F.2d 4 (D.C.Cir.1984)); see also Covington v. District of Columbia, 57 F.3d 1101, 1109 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1115 , 116 S.Ct. 916 , 133 L.Ed.2d 847 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hitchcock v. Woodside Literary Agency
(2×)
Compare Securitron Magnalock Corp. v. Schnabolk, 65 F.3d 256, 262-65 (2d Cir.1995) (two “separate and distinct” corporations, along with individual who was officer of both, formed RICO enterprise), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1114 , 116 S.Ct. 916 , 133 L.Ed.2d 846 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
LeBlanc-Sternberg v. Fletcher
(2×)
See, e.g., Securitron Magnalock Corp. v. Schnabolk, 65 F.3d 256, 263 (2d Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1114 , 116 S.Ct. 916 , 133 L.Ed.2d 846 (1996); Riverwoods Chappaqua Corp. v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A., 30 F.3d 339, 344 (2d Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
General Motors Corp. v. Ignacio Lopez De Arriortua
See, e.g., Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Mutual Trading Corp., 63 F.3d 516, 523 (7th Cir.1995) (“repeated infliction of economic injury upon a single victim of a single scheme is sufficient to establish a pattern of racketeering”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 916 , 133 L.Ed.2d 846 (1996); American Automotive Accessories, Inc. v. Fishman, 1996 WL 480369 (N.D.Ill.
Miller
v.
DeMuth
v.
DeMuth
No. 95-895.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 20, 1996.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. Alabama (1) · District of Columbia (1)
Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.