green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
4.0 score
“challenges to the effects of bona fide seniority systems may not be based upon assertions of disparate impact; rather a plaintiff must prove intentional discrimination”
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mullenix v. Forsyth Dental Infirmary for Children
challenges to the effects of bona fide seniority systems may not be based upon assertions of disparate impact; rather a plaintiff must prove intentional discrimination
discussed
Cited "see"
Bill Gray Enterprises, Inc. Employee Health & Welfare Plan Ex Rel. Bill Gray Enterprises, Inc. v. Gourley
See Moench v. Robertson, 62 F.3d 553, 566 (3d Cir.1995)(citing Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 187 ("Where discretion is conferred upon the trustee with respect to the exercise of a power, its exercise is not subject to control by the court, except to prevent abuse by the trustee of his discretion.”)), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1115 , 116 S.Ct. 917 , 133 L.Ed.2d 847 (1996). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Bill Gray Enterprises, Incorporated Employee Health And Welfare Plan v. Ronald L. Gourley
See Moench v. Robertson, 62 F.3d 553, 566 (3d Cir. 1995)(citing Restatement (Second) of Trusts 187 ("Where discretion is conferred upon the trustee with respect to the exercise of a power, its exercise is not subject to control by the court, except to prevent abuse by the trustee of his discretion.")), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1115 , 133 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Schultz v. Texaco Inc.
See Moench v. Robertson, 62 F.3d 553 (3d Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1115 , 116 S.Ct. 917 , 133 L.Ed.2d 847 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Potter
See Moench v. Robertson, 62 F.3d 553, 566 (3d Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1115 , 116 S.Ct. 917 , 133 L.Ed.2d 847 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Colgate Palmolive Co. v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
See Mark I Marketing Corp. v. Donnelley & Sons Co., 66 F.3d 285, 291 (Fed.Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 917 , 133 L.Ed.2d 847 (1996); Pall Corporation v. Micron Separations, Inc., 66 F.3d 1211 (Fed.Cir.1995); Zenith Lab, Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 19 F.3d 1418, 1424 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 500 , 130 L.Ed.2d 409 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jicarilla Apache Nation, Formerly Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. United States
See also Moench v. Robertson, 62 F.3d 553, 571 (3d Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1115 , 116 S.Ct. 917 , 133 L.Ed.2d 847 (1996); George Gleason Bogert, George Taylor Bogert & Amy Morris Hess, Bogert’s Trusts and Trustees § 671 (2012) (hereinafter, "Bogert’s Trusts”); 4 Austin Wakeman Scott, William Franklin Fratcher & Mark L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISA
See also Moench v. Robertson, 62 F.3d 553, 567 (3d Cir.1995)(where the plan language “constrains the [fiduciaries’] ability to act in the best interest of the beneficiaries,” it is inconsistent with ERISA and with the common law of trusts and must not be followed), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1115 , 116 S.Ct. 917 , 133 L.Ed.2d 847 (1996); Eaves v. Penn, 587 F.2d 453, 459 (10th Cir.1978)(“While an ESOP fiduciary may be released from certain Per Se violations on investments in employer securities ..., the structure of [ERISA] itself requires that in making an investment decision of whether or…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ilick v. Miller
Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 572 F.Supp. 354 (D.D.C.)(rev’d in part, 746 F.2d 4 (D.C.Cir.1984)); see also Covington v. District of Columbia, 57 F.3d 1101, 1109 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1115 , 116 S.Ct. 916 , 133 L.Ed.2d 847 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grabski v. Aetna, Inc.
Id.; see also Moench v. Robertson, 62 F.3d 553, 566 (3d Cir.1995) (applying same factors in the context of determining whether a fiduciary abused discretion by investing employee assets solely in employer securities), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1115 , 116 S.Ct. 917 , 133 L.Ed.2d 847 (1996); McCall v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Md. Reclamation v. Harford Cty.
See also Security v. Baltimore County, 104 Md.App. 234, 245-248 , 655 A.2d 1326, 1331-1333 , cert. denied, 339 Md. 643 , 664 A.2d 886 (1995), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 116 S.Ct. 917 , 133 L.Ed.2d 847 (1996). [13] For discussions of the perceived differences among the various federal appellate circuits in this area, see, e.g., Pearson v. City of Grand Blanc, 961 F.2d 1211 (6th Cir.1992); RRI Realty Corp. v. Incorporated Village of Southampton, 870 F.2d 911, 914-918 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 893 , 110 S.Ct. 240 , 107 L.Ed.2d 191 (1989); Red Maple Properties v. Zoning Com'n, supra, 222 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maryland Reclamation Associates, Inc. v. Harford County
See also Security v. Baltimore County, 104 Md.App. 234, 245-248 , 655 A.2d 1326, 1331-1333 , ce rt. denied, 339 Md. 643 , 664 A.2d 886 (1995), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 917 , 133 L.Ed.2d 847 (1996). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Maric
v.
St. Agnes Hospital Corp.
v.
St. Agnes Hospital Corp.
No. 95-930.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 20, 1996.
Published
Citer courts: District of Columbia (1) · D. Massachusetts (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.