green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.0 score
“while a conviction requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, a district court may sentence a defendant within the sentencing guidelines on any relevant evidence that has sufficient indicia of reliability to support its probable accuracy.”
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Rangel
while a conviction requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, a district court may sentence a defendant within the sentencing guidelines on any relevant evidence that has sufficient indicia of reliability to support its probable accuracy.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bolden
(2×)
See United States v. Brown, 70 F.3d 979, 980 (8th Cir.1995), and case cited, cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1114 , 116 S.Ct. 1341 , 134 L.Ed.2d 490 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Green v. State
See United States v. Villabona-Garnica, 63 F.3d 1051 (11th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S.—, 116 S.Ct. 1341 , 134 L.Ed.2d 490 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesus J. Lopez-Gutierrez
See United States v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 71 F.3d 1537, 1540-41 (10th Cir.1995) (holding that 21 U.S.C. § 851 (b) is not jurisdictional, and thus a trial judge’s failure to inform defendant of his opportunity to challenge a prior conviction which the prosecutor intends to use to enhance defendant’s sentence is subject to harmless error analysis), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1341 , 134 L.Ed.2d 490 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Salvador Vargas Navarro Samuel Pasqual Edmondson
Fed.R.Evid. 404(b). 19 See Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b) 20 Beechum, 582 F.2d at 911 21 United States v. Robinson, 700 F.2d 205 (5th Cir.1983); see also United States v. Zabaneh, 837 F.2d 1249 (5th Cir.1988) 22 United States v. Royal, 972 F.2d 643, 647 (5th Cir.1992) (citations omitted) (quoting United States v. Randall, 887 F.2d 1262, 1268 (5th Cir.1989)) 23 United States v. Coleman, 78 F.3d 154 (5th Cir.1996) 24 United States v. Mmahat, 106 F.3d 89 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 200 , 139 L.Ed.2d 138 (1997) 25 Id 26 United States v. Pedroza, 78 F.3d 179 (5th Cir.1996) 27 405 U.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pedro Elizondo Garza Jorge Inocencio Homero Hinojosa Garcia Oziel Alanis
Although a conviction on a substantive count requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, the district court may sentence a defendant within the Sentencing Guidelines on any relevant evidence that “has sufficient indicia of reliability to support its probable accuracy.” U.S.S.G. § 6A1.3; see also United States v. Buchanan, 70 F.3d 818, 828 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1340 , 134 L.Ed.2d 490 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. STEVEN E MAY, Sheriff
Ed. 2d 490 (1994). -2- held, “The defendant must be a party to the forfeiture proceeding for jeopardy to attach." United States v. Gonzalez, 76 F.3d 1339, 1343 (5th Cir. 1996); see also United States v. Buchanan, 70 F.3d 818 , 830 n.12 (5th Cir. 1995) (holding that jeopardy does not attach where “defendant is a non-party to a forfeiture proceeding, and does not assert ownership over the property”), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 116 S. Ct. 1340 , 134 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Villabona-Garnica
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 95-8027.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 25, 1996.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.