green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven Wayne Kurkowski
See United States v. Aikens, 64 F.3d 372, 376 (8th Cir.1995), vacated on other grounds by 517 U.S. 1116 , 116 S.Ct. 1346 , 134 L.Ed.2d 516 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Willie Mays Aikens
See Aikens v. United States, 517 U.S. 1116 , 116 S.Ct. 1346 , 134 L.Ed.2d 516 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mikkel H. Stavig
United States v. Naranjo, 52 F.3d 245, 250 (9th Cir.1995); see also United States v. Bender, 33 F.3d 21, 23 (8th Cir.1994) (stating that “the government has the burden of proof with respect to the base offense level and any enhancing factors, [while] [t]he defendant has the burden to prove mitigating factors” (citations omitted)). “[Sentencing entrapment may occur where outrageous government conduct overcomes the will of a defendant predisposed to deal only in small quantities of drugs, for the purpose of increasing the amount of drugs and the resulting sentence imposed against that defe…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McLeod
v.
Oregon Lithoprint, Inc., dba News-Register Publishing Co.
v.
Oregon Lithoprint, Inc., dba News-Register Publishing Co.
No. 95-296.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 1, 1996.
Cited by 10 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Varity Corp. v. Howe, 516 U. S. 489 (1996). Justice Scalia would deny certiorari.