green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
(2×)
Indeed, the evidence I have just described leads me to conclude that "the interest given in justification of [section 323(a) ] is not compelling." Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520, 547 , 113 S.Ct. 2217 , 124 L.Ed.2d 472 (1993); see Blount v. SEC, 61 F.3d 938, 946 (D.C.Cir. 1995) (speech restriction will be struck if it "provides only ineffective or remote support for [its] asserted goals" (quotations omitted)), cert, denied, 517 U.S. 1119 , 116 S.Ct. 1351 , 134 L.Ed.2d 520 (1996); Cross Exam of Def.
discussed
Cited "see"
Valley National Bank v. Lavecchia
(2×)
See Owensboro Nat’l Bank v. Stephens, 44 F.3d 388 (6th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1119 , 116 S.Ct. 1350 , 134 L.Ed.2d 519 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Owens
(2×)
See United States v. Kennedy, 61 F.3d 494 (6th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1119 , 116 S.Ct. 1351 , 134 L.Ed.2d 520 (1996); United States v. Seals, 987 F.2d 1102 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 853 , 114 S.Ct. 155 , 126 L.Ed.2d 116 (1993); United States v. Perea, 986 F.2d 633 (2d Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dean Foods Co. v. Tracy
See National Solid Wastes Management Ass’n v. Meyer, 63 F.3d 652, 657 (7th Cir.1995) (citing Fort Gratiot Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Michigan Dep’t of Natural Resources, 504 U.S. 353, 359 , 112 S.Ct. 2019 , 119 L.Ed.2d 139 (1992)), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1119 , 116 S.Ct. 1351 , 134 L.Ed.2d 520 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles A. Eidson, Sandra A. Eidson
See United States v. Waymer, 55 F.3d 564, 568 (11th Cir.1995), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1350 , 134 L.Ed.2d 519 (1996) (noting that vagueness challenges that do not involve the First Amendment are examined in light of facts before the court).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eidson
See United States v. Waymer, 55 F.3d 564, 568 (11th Cir.1995), cert. denied, --- U.S. -- --, 116 S.Ct. 1350 , 134 L.Ed.2d 519 (1996) (noting that vagueness challenges that do not involve the First Amendment are examined in light of facts before the court).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Soukharith
See, also, U.S. v. Kennedy, 61 F.3d 494 (6th Cir. 1995) (holding that inevitable discovery exception to exclusionary rule applies when prosecution can demonstrate either existence of independent, untainted investigation that inevitably would have uncovered same evidence or other compelling facts establishing that disputed evidence inevitably would have been discovered), cert. denied 517 U.S. 1119 , 116 S. Ct. 1351 , 134 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lopez-Lukis
See, e.g., United States v. Waymer, 55 F.3d 564 (11th Cir.1995), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 1350 , 134 L.Ed.2d 519 (1996). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sun-Diamond Growers of California
S17, 360-02 (daily ed. Nov. 10, 1988); see also United States v. Waymer, 55 F.3d 564 , 568 n. 3 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1350 , 134 L.Ed.2d 519 (1996) ("Congress’ purpose in enacting § 1346 was to restore the mail fraud statute to its pre-McNally position ...”). 31 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stephens, Commissioner, Kentucky Department of Insurance
v.
Owensboro National Bank
v.
Owensboro National Bank
No. 95-74.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 1, 1996.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.