green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.6 score
“plaistow i”
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles S. Barker Express Golf, Inc. v. Golf U.S.A., Inc.
(2×)
See Doctor’s Assocs. v. Distajo, 66 F.3d 438, 452 (2d Cir.1995) (“Most courts facing this issue have arrived at the same conclusion [that consideration for the entire contract is sufficient to support the arbitration clause].”) (citing eases), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1120 , 116 S.Ct. 1352 , 134 L.Ed.2d 520 (1996); see also Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 79 (1979) (“If the requirement of consideration is met, there is no additional requirement of ... ‘mutuality of obligation.’ ”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles Barker v. Golf U.S.A.
See Doctor's Assocs. v. Distajo, 66 F.3d 438 , 452 (2d Cir. 1995) ("Most courts facing this issue have arrived at the same conclusion [that consideration for the entire contract is sufficient to support the arbitration clause].") (citing cases), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1120 (1996); see also Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 79 (1979) ("If the requirement of consideration is met, there is no additional requirement of . . . 'mutuality of obligation.'").
cited
Cited "see"
Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Erik J. Hamilton
See Doctor’s Assocs. v. Distajo, 66 F.3d 438, 444 (2d Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1120 , 116 S.Ct. 1352 , 134 L.Ed.2d 520 (1996) (Distajo I).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
DRAKE, DEBORAH v. MUNDRICK, RICHARD
Nevertheless, we conclude that the date of commencement of the foreign action could not serve as the valuation date for equitable distribution of the marital property because the foreign action for divorce was not “an action in which equitable distribution [was] available,” and the foreign court in this case thus lacked jurisdiction over any of the parties’ marital assets (Anglin v Anglin, 80 NY2d 553, 557 ; see Sullivan v Sullivan, 201 AD2d 417, 417 ; see also -2- 1010 CA 15-01022 Matter of Nicit v Nicit, 217 AD2d 1006, 1006 , appeal dismissed and lv denied 86 NY2d 883 , rearg denied 87…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Drake v. Mundrick
Nevertheless, we conclude that the date of commencement of the foreign action could not serve as the valuation date for equitable distribution of the marital property because the foreign action for divorce was not “an action in which equitable distribution [was] available,” and the foreign court in this case thus lacked jurisdiction over any of the parties’ marital assets (Anglin v Anglin, 80 NY2d 553, 557 [1992]; see Sullivan v Sullivan, 201 AD2d 417, 417 [1994]; see also Matter of Nicit v Nicit, 217 AD2d 1006 , 1006 [1995], appeal dismissed and lv denied 86 NY2d 883 [1995], rearg denie…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Drake v. Mundrick
Nevertheless, we conclude that the date of commencement of the foreign action could not serve as the valuation date for equitable distribution of the marital property because the foreign action for divorce was not “an action in which equitable distribution [was] available,” and the foreign court in this case thus lacked jurisdiction over any of the parties’ marital assets (Anglin v Anglin, 80 NY2d 553, 557 [1992]; see Sullivan v Sullivan, 201 AD2d 417, 417 [1994]; see also Matter of Nicit v Nicit, 217 AD2d 1006 , 1006 [1995], appeal dismissed and lv denied 86 NY2d 883 [1995], rearg denie…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Walters v. LOCAL UNION NO. 337
See also Dushaw v. Roadway Express, Inc., 66 F.3d 129, 132 (6th Cir.1995), cert. *892 denied, 517 U.S. 1120 , 116 S.Ct. 1353 , 134 L.Ed.2d 521 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Distajo
v.
Doctor's Associates, Inc.
v.
Doctor's Associates, Inc.
No. 95-1086.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 1, 1996.
517 U.S. 1120
Published
Citer courts: D. New Hampshire (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.