green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
McMillan v. Togus Regional Office, Department of Veteran Affairs
Although federally chartered, the Academy is a private nonprofit non-governmental organization, a “self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare.” Inst. of Med., Veterans and Agent Orange: Update 2002, (the “Report”) at iv; see LeFevre v. Secretary, Dept. of Veterans Affairs, 66 F.3d 1191, 1193 (Fed.Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1188 , 116 S.Ct. 1674 , 134 L.Ed.2d 778 (1996); see also Agent Orange Act of 1991, at § 3(a), Pub.
discussed
Cited "see"
MDS Associates, Limited Partnership v. United States
Co., 983 F.2d 1039, 1042 (Fed.Cir.1993)); see King Instruments Corp v. Perego, 65 F.3d 941, 945-46 (Fed.Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1675 , 134 L.Ed.2d 778 (1996); Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 933-34 (Fed.Cir.1987) (en banc).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cygnus Therapeutics Systems v. Alza Corporation
See King Instruments Corp. v. Perego, 65 F.3d 941, 950-51 , 36 USPQ2d 1129, 1135-36 (Fed.Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1675 , 134 L.Ed.2d 778 (1996) (“This court should not presume to determine how a patentee should maximize its reward for investing in innovation ....
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cargill, Inc. v. Sears Petroleum & Transport Corp.
See, e.g., King Instruments Corp. v. Perego, 65 F.3d 941, 947 (Fed.Cir.1995) (“The Patent Act also includes enhanced damages for willful infringement or bad faith and for attorney fees.”), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1188 , 116 S.Ct. 1675 , 134 L.Ed.2d 778 (1996); Hilton Davis Chem.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Independent Service Organizations Antitrust Litigation
See, e.g., King Instruments Corp. v. Perego, 65 F.3d 941, 950 (Fed.Cir.1995) (Patent Act creates incentive for innovation and upon grant of patent, only limitation on patentee’s economic reward during period of exclusivity should be dictated by marketplace), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1188 , 116 S.Ct. 1675 , 134 L.Ed.2d 778 (1996); United States v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle, m.b.H., 670 F.2d 1122, 1129 (D.C.Cir.1981) (patent gives holder unlimited right to exclude others from utilizing its process).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Indep. Serv. Organizations Antitrust Lit.
See, e.g., King Instruments Corp. v. Perego, 65 F.3d 941, 950 (Fed.Cir.1995) (Patent Act creates incentive for innovation and upon grant of patent, only limitation on patentee's economic reward during period of exclusivity should be dictated by marketplace), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1188 , 116 S.Ct. 1675 , 134 L.Ed.2d 778 (1996); United States v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle, m.b.H., 670 F.2d 1122, 1129 (D.C.Cir.1981) (patent gives holder unlimited right to exclude others from utilizing its process).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Creative Copier Services v. Xerox Corp.
See, e.g., King Instruments Corp. v. Perego, 65 F.3d 941, 950 (Fed.Cir.1995) (Patent Act creates incentive for innovation and upon grant of patent, only limitation on patentee’s economic reward during period of exclusivity should be dictated by marketplace), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1188 , 116 S.Ct. 1675 , 134 L.Ed.2d 778 (1996); United States v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle, m.b.H., 670 F.2d 1122, 1129 (D.C.Cir.1981) (patent gives holder unlimited right to exclude others from utilizing its process).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Independent Service Organizations Antitrust Litigation
See, e.g., King Instruments Corp. v. Perego, 65 F.3d 941, 950 (Fed.Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1188 , 116 S.Ct. 1675 , 134 L.Ed.2d 778 (1996) (“Thus, the Patent Act creates an incentive for innovation.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lebron
v.
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
v.
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
No. 95-1373.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 13, 1996.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.