green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Newport v. Ford Motor Company
But see Gummo v. Village of Depew, 75 F.3d 98, 105-06 (2d Cir.) (holding amended standard applies to pre-existing cases), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 1678 , 134 L.Ed.2d 780 (1996).
cited
Cited "but see"
James F. Newport v. Ford Motor Co.
But see Gummo v. Village of Depew, 75 F.3d 98, 105-06 (2d Cir.) (holding amended standard applies to pre-existing cases), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1678 , 134 L.Ed.2d 780 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. School Bd. of Polk County, Florida
See Sanguinetti v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 114 F.Supp.2d 1313, 1318 (S.D.Fla.2000), aff'd, 254 F.3d 75 (11th Cir.2001), (citing Gummo v. Village of Depew, NY, 75 F.3d 98, 106 (2d Cir.1996), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1190 , 116 S.Ct. 1678 , 134 L.Ed.2d 780 (1996)); Robinson v. Morris Moore Chevrolet-Buick, Inc., 974 F.Supp. 571, 575 (E.D.Tx.1997) (citations omitted); Sheehan v. Department of the Navy, 240 F.3d 1009, 1013 (Fed.Cir.2001) (citations omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
Sanguinetti v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
See Gummo v. Village of Depew, NY, 75 F.3d 98, 106 (2d Cir.1996), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1190 , 116 S.Ct. 1678 , 134 L.Ed.2d 780 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brandsasse v. City of Suffolk, Va.
See Gummo v. Village of Depew, NY, 75 F.3d 98, 106 (2d Cir.1996), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1190 , 116 S.Ct. 1678 , 134 L.Ed.2d 780 (1996) (citing S.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see"
Barreto v. ITT World Directories, Inc.
See Gummo v. Village of Depew, N.Y. 75 F.3d 98, 106-7 (2nd Cir.), *391 cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1190 , 116 S.Ct. 1678 , 134 L.Ed.2d 780 (1996); Kelley v. Maine Eye Care Assoc., 37 F.Supp.2d 47 (D.Me.1999); Robinson v. Morris Moore Chevrolet-Buick, Inc., 974 F.Supp. 571, 575 (E.D.Tex.1997) and Lt.
cited
Cited "see"
Satterfield v. Borough of Schuylkill Haven
See Gummo v. Village of Depew, 75 F.3d 98, 106 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 517 U.S. 1190 , 116 S.Ct. 1678 , 134 L.Ed.2d 780 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re County of Orange
See Mangla v. University of Rochester, 168 F.R.D. 137, 140 (W.D.N.Y.1996) (citing Irons v. Karceski, 74 F.3d 1262 (D.C.Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1677 , 134 L.Ed.2d 780 (1996)) (party moving to quash a subpoena bears a heavy burden of proof).
discussed
Cited "see"
Key v. Hearst Corp.
See Gummo v. Village of Depew, 75 F.3d 98, 106 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. — , 116 S.Ct. 1678 , 134 L.Ed.2d 780 (1996) (affirming use of burden-shifting scheme whereby claimant establishes prima facie case of discrimination and defendant demonstrates that claimant’s employment would have been terminated regardless of claimant’s military status); see also Sawyer v. Swift & Co., 836 F.2d 1257, 1262 (10th Cir.1988) (applying three-step McDonnell Douglas analysis to VRRA claim).
cited
Cited "see"
Levy v. Kosher Overseers Ass'n of America, Inc.
See generally Gummo v. Village of Depew, 75 F.3d 98, 107 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1678 , 134 L.Ed.2d 780 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Levy v. Kosher Overseers Association of America, Inc.
See generally Gummo v. Village of Depew, 75 F.3d 98, 107 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 1678 , 134 L.Ed.2d 780 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rogers v. City of San Antonio, Texas
See also Gummo v. Village of Depew, 75 F.3d 98, 106 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1190 , 116 S.Ct. 1678 , 134 L.Ed.2d 780 (1996); and Curby, 216 F.3d at 556 . 47 . 452 U.S. 549 , 101 S.Ct. 2510 , 69 L.Ed.2d 226 (1981). 48 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lazard Freres & Co., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Protective Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant
See, e.g., Gummo v. Village of Depew, 75 F.3d 98, 107 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1678 , 134 L.Ed.2d 780 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stanley Diaz-Gandia v. Maria Rosa Dapena-Thompson
VRRA § 2021(b)(3) was enacted “to protect potential and existing reservists from policies that deter employees from joining the reserves.” Boyle v. Burke, 925 F.2d 497, 502 (1st Cir.1991); see also Gummo v. Village of Depew, N.Y., 75 F.3d 98, 104 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1678 , 134 L.Ed.2d 780 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mangla v. University of Rochester
See also Irons v. Karceski, 74 F.3d 1262 (D.C.Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1677 , 134 L.Ed.2d 780 (1996) (holding that an attorney fact witness was not entitled to be paid his hourly billing rate and not unduly burdened by being compensated $40 per day plus mileage for an expected three day deposition).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund
v.
Sherwin-Williams Co.
v.
Sherwin-Williams Co.
No. 95-1470.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 13, 1996.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.