green
Positive treatment
4.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Young v. Hawaii
See Hickman v. Block, 81 F.3d 98, 101-102 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 912 , 117 S.Ct. 276 , 136 L.Ed.2d 199 (1996) (quoting United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174, 178 , 59 S.Ct. 816 , 83 L.Ed. 1206 (1939)); and Silveira v. Lockyer, 312 F.3d 1052, 1066-1067 (9th Cir.2002)(“0ur court ... has interpreted Miller as rejecting the traditional individual rights view.”), petition for rehearing en banc denied, 328 F.3d 567 (9th Cir.2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians v. Leavitt
See Hickman v. Block, 81 F.3d 98, 101 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 912 , 117 S.Ct. 276 , 136 L.Ed.2d 199 (1996) (holding that because the Second Amendment did not guarantee an individual right to bear arms, plaintiff claimed only a gen *1241 eralized grievance and did not have standing to bring suit); Arjay Assocs., Inc. v. Bush, 891 F.2d 894 , 898 (Fed.Cir.1989) (plaintiffs lacked standing because “the injury they assert is to a nonexistent right to continued importation of a Congressionally excluded product”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Savchenko
See United States v. Van Poyck, 77 F.3d 285, 289 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 519 U.S. 912 , 117 S.Ct. 276 , 136 L.Ed.2d 199 (1996). .
cited
Cited "see"
Golt v. City of Signal Hill
See Hickman v. Block, 81 F.3d 98 (9th Cir.1996) cert. denied 519 U.S. 912 , 117 S.Ct. 276 , 136 L.Ed.2d 199 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kyllo
See United States v. Van Poyck, 77 F.3d 285, 290 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 276 , 136 L.Ed.2d 199 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gilday v. Dubois
Accord United States v. Van Poyck, 77 F.3d 285, 292 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 276 , 136 L.Ed.2d 199 (1996); United States v. Horr, 963 F.2d 1124, 1126 (8th Cir.1992); United States v. Willoughby, 860 F.2d 15, 19 (2d Cir.1988) (citing Amen, 831 F.2d at 378 ); Watkins v. L.M.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Siddiq v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Van Poyck, 77 F.3d 285, 291 (9th Cir.) (recognizing law-enforcement exception), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 912 , 117 S.Ct. 276 , 136 L.Ed.2d 199 (1996); United States v. Sababu, 891 F.2d 1308, 1328-29 (7th Cir.1989) (same); United States v. Paul, 614 F.2d 115, 117 (6th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 941 , 100 S.Ct. 2165 , 64 L.Ed.2d 796 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bournes
More generally, Defendant’s broad appeal to the Second Amendment is defeated by the Sixth Circuit’s express holding that this constitutional provision confers “a collective rather than an individual right.” Warin, 530 F.2d at 106 ; see also Hickman v. Block, 81 F.3d 98, 102 (9th Cir.) (relying on Warin and other cases to reach the same conclusion), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 912 , 117 S.Ct. 276 , 136 L.Ed.2d 199 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wright
(2×)
Compare Hickman v. Block, 81 F.3d 98, 101-02 (9th Cir.) (dismissing, due to lack of standing, civil challenge to firearms regulation), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 276 , 136 L.Ed.2d 199 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Brecunier
Compare Hickman v. Block, 81 F.3d 98, 101 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 117 S.Ct. 276 , 136 L.Ed.2d 199 (1996) (holding that "the Second Amendment is a right held by the states, and does not protect the possession of a weapon by a private citizen”), with United States v. Gomez, 92 F.3d 770 , 774 n. 7 (9th Cir.1996) ("[t]he Second Amendment embodies the right to defend oneself and one’s home against physical attack”), and United States v. Hale, 978 F.2d 1016, 1020 (8th Cir.1992), ce rt. denied, 507 U.S. 997 , 113 S.Ct. 1614 , 123 L.Ed.2d 174 (1993) (purpose of Second Amendment "…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maryland Casualty Company v. Realty Advisory Board on Labor Relations, Gus Bevona, President, Local 32b-32j, Service Employees International Union
See also Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central Cartage Co., 84 F.3d 988, 993 (7th Cir.) (same rule in Seventh Circuit), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 117 S.Ct. 276 , 136 L.Ed.2d 199 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Central Cartage Co.
v.
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Area Pension Fund
v.
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Area Pension Fund
No. 96-111.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1996.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of National Association for Dispute Resolution, Inc., for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Cer-tiorari denied.