Dillard Dep't Stores, Inc. v. Harold's Stores, Inc., 519 U.S. 928 (1996). · Go Syfert
Dillard Dep't Stores, Inc. v. Harold's Stores, Inc., 519 U.S. 928 (1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
44 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Brodtmann v. Duke (lactapp, 2002-01-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Brodtmann v. Duke
La. Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Dep't Stores, 82 F.3d 1533, 1555 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 928 , 117 S.Ct. 297 , 136 L.Ed.2d 216 (1996).
discussed Cited "see" Hillman v. United States Postal Service
D. Kan. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
Co., 36 F.3d 1491 , 1502 (10th Cir.1994) (citation omitted); see Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Department Stores, 82 F.3d 1533, 1546 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 928 , 117 S.Ct. 297 , 136 L.Ed.2d 216 (1996).
cited Cited "see" Mitchell v. City of Moore
10th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Dep’t Stores, Inc., 82 F.3d 1533, 1555 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 928 , 117 S.Ct. 297 , 136 L.Ed.2d 216 (1996).
discussed Cited "see" Gordon M. Becker v. University of Nebraska, at Omaha
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc., 82 F.3d 1533 , 1540 n. 3 (10th Cir.) (noting appellant's burden to provide reviewing court with essential references to record to carry its burden of proving error), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 928 , 117 S.Ct. 297 , 136 L.Ed.2d 216 (1996).
cited Cited "see" Rick Webb v. Abf Freight System, Inc., a Corporation, and Teamsters Local Union No. 17
10th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Dep’t Stores, Inc., 82 F.3d 1533, 1546 (10th Cir.1996), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 297 , 136 L.Ed.2d 216 (1996).
discussed Cited "see" Audiotext Communications Network, Inc. v. U.S. Telecom, Inc.
10th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Dep't Stores, Inc., 82 F.3d 1533 , 1540 n. 3 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 297 , 136 L.Ed.2d 216 (1996). 33 We review de novo Audiotext's claim that the district court misinterpreted Fla.Stat.Ann. § 768.73 by applying it to Audiotext's award of punitive damages.
cited Cited "see" Lancaster v. Independent School District No. 5
10th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Dep’t Stores, Inc., 82 F.3d 1533, 1555 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 297 , 136 L.Ed.2d 216 (1996).
discussed Cited "see" Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.
D. Kan. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
Co., 36 F.3d 1491 , 1502 (10th Cir.1994) (citation omitted); see Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Department Stores, 82 F.3d 1533, 1546 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 928 , 117 S.Ct. 297 , 136 L.Ed.2d 216 (1996).
cited Cited "see" Maria F. Ramirez v. Ibp, Inc.
10th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Dep't Stores, Inc., 82 F.3d 1533, 1546 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 297 , 136 L.Ed.2d 216 (1996).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Leon, D.M. (2×)
10th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Dep’t Stores, Inc., 82 F.3d 1533, 1541-42 (10th Cir.) (discussing the principle that interlocutory orders are usually not immediately appealable), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 297 , 136 L.Ed.2d 216 (1996).
discussed Cited "see" Forgione v. Dennis Pirtle Agency, Inc.
Fla. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Can Do, Inc. Pension & Profit Sharing Plan v. Manier, Herod, Hollabaugh & Smith, 922 S.W.2d 865, 868 (Tenn.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 117 S.Ct. 298 , 136 L.Ed.2d 216 (1996), which cites a number of cases where other jurisdictions have concluded that public policy considerations militate against allowing assignment of legal malpractice actions.
discussed Cited "see" United States Surgical Corp. v. Orris, Inc. (2×)
D. Kan. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. at 1546 n. 9 (“Because deficiencies in the survey bear on the weight and not the admissibility of the evidence, ... we reject [defendant’s] arguments that ... the survey questions were slanted, leading, and ambiguous.”).
cited Cited "see, e.g." City of Hobbs v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company, and Nutmeg Insurance Company
10th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Dep’t Stores, Inc., 82 F.3d 1533, 1546 (10th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 297 , 136 L.Ed.2d 216 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dillard Department Stores, Inc.
v.
Harold's Stores, Inc.
No. 96-195.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1996.
519 U.S. 928
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.