green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Truitt v. County of Wayne
See Equal Employment Opportunity Comm’n v. Kentucky State Police Dep’t, 80 F.3d 1086 , 1094 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 385 , 136 L.Ed.2d 302 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
77 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 657, 74 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,580 Judy Truitt v. County of Wayne Detroit-Wayne County Mental Health Board, Jointly and Severally
See Equal Employment Opportunity Comm'n v. Kentucky State Police Dep't, 80 F.3d 1086 , 1094 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 385 , 136 L.Ed.2d 302 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lamar Lowe
(2×)
See United States v. Spring, 80 F.3d 1450, 1464-66 (10th Cir.) (924(c) conviction based on accomplice liability reversed where "use" instruction was incorrect under Bailey and "carry" instruction was incomplete), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 385 , 136 L.Ed.2d 302 (1996). 7 In this case, although the indictment charged Mr. Lowe (and his co-defendants) with "us[ing] and carry[ing]" a firearm in violation of § 924(c), the jury was never instructed on the "carrying" prong. 5 Rather, the relevant instructions read as follows: 8 You are instructed that in regard to the offense charged in …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Monson Lee Durham, Also Known as Lee Durham, Cross-Appellee. United States of America v. Danny Ray Evans, Also Known as Danny Taylor
(2×)
See United States v. Spring, 80 F.3d 1450, 1465 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 385 , 136 L.Ed.2d 302 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Durham
(2×)
See United States v. Spring, 80 F.3d 1450, 1465 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 385 , 136 L.Ed.2d 302 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marcus Canady
See United States v. Spring, 80 F.3d 1450, 1464 (10th Cir.) (“Bailey suggests that neither storage nor possession of a gun, without more, satisfies the ‘carry’ prong of § 924(e)(1).”), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 385 , 136 L.Ed.2d 302 (1996); United States v. Windom, 82 F.3d 742, 749 (7th Cir.1996) (“carry” requires more than mere availability of gun), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1716 , 137 L.Ed.2d 839 (1997); United States v. Moore, 76 F.3d 111, 113 (6th Cir.1996) (availability of weapon is necessary but not sufficient condition for conviction under “carry” pro…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert M. Joost
See 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(8)(B)(iv); see also United States v. Spring, 80 F.3d 1450, 1457 (10th Cir.) (interpreting the statute to mean that “[a]dequate preparation time and continuity of counsel are clearly permissible reasons for granting a continuance and tolling the Speedy Trial Act”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 385 , 136 L.Ed.2d 302 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mary L. Clark v. Marvin T. Runyon, Jr., Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
See Lever v. Northwestern Univ., 979 F.2d 552, 556 (7th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 951 , 113 S.Ct. 2443 , 124 L.Ed.2d 661 (1993); EEOC v. O’Grady, 857 F.2d 383 , 394 (7th Cir.1988); see also EEOC v. Kentucky State Police Dep’t, 80 F.3d 1086 , 1094 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 385 , 136 L.Ed.2d 302 (1996); Dixon v. Shalala, 54 F.3d 1019, 1031 (2d Cir.1995); Doherty v. Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia & Vicinity, 16 F.3d 1386, 1389 (3d Cir.1994); but see Miranda v. B & B Cash Grocery Store, Inc., 975 F.2d 1518, 1531 (11th Cir.1992) (de novo review).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mennen v. Easter Stores
Corp., 17 F.3d 1104 , 1114 (8th Cir.) (adopting the majority rule among the circuits and holding that unemployment benefits should not be deducted from awards of backpay under the ADEA) (citations omitted), 513 U.S. 946 , 115 S.Ct. 355 , 130 L.Ed.2d 310 (1994); see also Equal Employment Opportunity Comm’n v. Kentucky State Police Dep’t, 80 F.3d 1086 , 1100 (6th Cir.) (district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to deduct unemployment compensation), — U.S. —, 117 S.Ct. 385 , 136 L.Ed.2d 302 (1996); Craig v. Y & Y Snacks, Inc., 721 F.2d 77, 81-85 (3d Cir.1983) (holding that …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cal-Almond, Inc.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 96-11.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 4, 1996.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.