green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.7 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Sisseton III”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Sisseton-Wahpeton III”
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State of New Jersey v. Habeeb Robinson
See State v. Womack, 145 N.J. 576, 589 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1011 , 117 S. Ct. 517 , 136 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State of New Jersey v. Habeeb Robinson
See State v. Womack, 145 N.J. 576, 589 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1011 , 117 S. Ct. 517 , 136 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Simon
See State v. Womack, 145 N.J. 576, 590 , 679 A. 2d 606 (State may re-present matter to a grand jury after indictment quashed), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1011 , 117 S.Ct. 517 , 136 L.Ed. 2d 405 (1996); State v. Hart, 139 N.J.Super. 565, 569 , 354 A. 2d 679 (App.Div.1976) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Mustaro
See Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 437-38 , 115 S.Ct. 1555, 1567-68 , 131 L.Ed. 2d 490, 508-09 (1995) (imputing knowledge of evidence known to the police to the prosecutor); accord State v. Womack, 145 N.J. 576, 589 , 679 A. 2d 606 (1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1011 , 117 S.Ct. 517 , 136 L.Ed. 2d 405 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Doucet Ex Rel. Doucet v. Chilton County Board of Education
See Florida League of Professional Lobbyists, Inc. v. Meggs, 87 F.3d 457, 462 (11th Cir.) (Circuit courts are “not at liberty to *1258 disregard binding case law that is so closely on point and has only been weakened.”), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1010 , 117 S.Ct. 516 , 136 L.Ed.2d 405 (1996); United States v. Smith, 122 F.3d 1355, 1359 (11th Cir.1997) (“[E]ven where it has been weakened, but not overruled, by a Supreme Court decision, prior panel precedent must be followed”), cer t. denied, 522 U.S. 1021 , 118 S.Ct. 614 , 139 L.Ed.2d 500 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
John G. Meyer v. Schnucks Markets, Inc., and Cy Jansen
(2×)
See Luecke v. Schnucks Markets, Inc., 85 F.3d 356, 359-62 (8th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 517 , 136 L.Ed.2d 405 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy MacK WEST, A.K.A. Teeny Man, Etc., Defendant-Appellant
(2×)
See United States v. Kramer, 73 F.3d 1067 , 1074 n. 16 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 516 , 136 L.Ed.2d 405 (1996); Christopher, 923 F.2d at 1549-50 ; Allison, 908 F.2d at 1533-34 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. West
See United States v. Kramer, 73 F.3d 1067 , 1074 n. 16 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 516 , 136 L.Ed.2d 405 (1996); Christopher, 923 F.2d at 1549-50 ; Allison, 908 F.2d at 1533-34 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Eisenman
See State v. Womack, *469 145 N.J. 576, 583 , 679 A.2d 606 , cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 517 , 136 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
St. John v. International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, Local 1010, Dist. 118, Local Lodge No. 254
Lingle v. Norge Div. of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399, 407 , 108 S.Ct. 1877, 1882 , 100 L.Ed.2d 410 (1988); see Luecke v. Schnucks Markets, Inc., 85 F.3d 356 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 517 , 136 L.Ed.2d 405 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nos. 97-2108, 97-2111
Lingle v. Norge Div. of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399, 407 , 108 S.Ct. 1877, 1882 , 100 L.Ed.2d 410 (1988); see Luecke v. Schnucks Markets, Inc., 85 F.3d 356 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 517 , 136 L.Ed.2d 405 (1996). 10 A. The Claims Against the Union Defendants.
discussed
Cited "see"
Loudner v. United States
See Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe v. United States, 90 F.3d 351, 355 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 516 , 136 L.Ed.2d 405 (1996) (unsuccessful attempt of the three named tribes to invalidate altogether the share of the non-member lineal descendants). 20 After learning of the fund's existence at the meeting we have described, the plaintiffs brought this case.
discussed
Cited "see"
Joyce Loudner v. United States
See Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe v. United States, 90 F.3d 351, 355 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), ce rt. denied, - U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 516 , 136 L.Ed.2d 405 (1996) (unsuccessful attempt of the three named tribes to invalidate altogether the share of the non-member lineal descendants).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ross v. State of Alabama
Compare Florida League of Professional Lobbyists, Inc. v. Meggs, 87 F.3d 457, 462 (11th Cir.) (a court panel was "not at liberty to disregard binding case law that is so closely on point and has only been weakened”), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 516 , 136 L.Ed.2d 405 (1996); United States v. Smith, 122 F.3d 1355, 1359 (11th Cir.) ("even where it has been weakened, but not overruled, by a Supreme Court decision, prior panel precedent must be followed"), cert. denied, -U.S.-•, 118 S.Ct. 614 , 139 L.Ed.2d 500 (1997), with Cottrell v. Caldwell, 85 F.3d 1480, 1484-85 (11th Cir.1996) (Becaus…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Helton v. Hawkins
Compare Florida League of Professional Lobbyists, Inc. v. Meggs, 87 F.3d 457, 462 (11th Cir.1996) (a court panel was “not at liberty to disregard binding ease law that is so closely on point and has only been weakened”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 117 S.Ct. 516 , 136 L.Ed.2d 405 (1996); United States v. Smith, 122 F.3d 1355, 1359 (11th Cir.1997) (“even where it has been weakened, but not overruled, by a Supreme Court decision, prior panel precedent must be followed”), cer t. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 614 , 139 L.Ed.2d 500 (1997), with Cottrell v. Caldwell, 85 F.3d 1480, 1484-85 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reynolds v. Alabama Department of Transportation
Compare Florida League of Prof'l Lobbyists, Inc. v. Meggs, 87 F.3d 457, 462 (11th Cir.) (a court panel was “not at liberty to disregard binding case law that, is so closely on point and has only been weakened”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 516 , 136 L.Ed.2d 405 (1996); United States v. Smith, 122 F.3d 1355, 1359 (11th Cir.1997) (“even where it has been weakened, but not overruled, by a Supreme Court decision, prior panel precedent must be followed”), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 614 , 139 L.Ed.2d 500 (1997), with Cottrell v. Caldwell, 85 F.3d 1480, 1484-85 (11th Cir.199…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Motorcity Of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank N.A.
See also Florida League of Prof'l Lobbyists, Inc. v. Meggs, 87 F.3d 457, 462 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 516 , 136 L.Ed.2d 405 (1996).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Motorcity of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank N.A.
See also Florida League of Prof'l Lobbyists, Inc. v. Meggs, 87 F.3d 457, 462 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 516 , 136 L.Ed.2d 405 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John D. Rogers
See also United States v. Kramer, 73 F.3d 1067, 1074 (11th Cir.) (holding that the court was only authorized to undertake plain error review even though the Supreme Court decided Gaudin after defendant was convicted), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 516 , 136 L.Ed.2d 405 (1996); United States v. Ross, 77 F.3d 1525, 1539 (7th Cir.1996) (applying plain error analysis even though Gaudin overturned settled precedent after trial); United States v. David, 83 F.3d 638, 645 (4th Cir.1996) (holding, in a case retroactively applying Gaudin , that “both the purposes of the contemporaneous objection…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fred SMITH, Defendant-Appellant
See, e.g., Florida League of Prof'l Lobbyists, Inc. v. Meggs, 87 F.3d 457, 462 (11th Cir.) (holding that even where it has been weakened, but not overruled, by a Supreme Court decision, prior panel precedent must be followed), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 516 , 136 L.Ed.2d 405 (1996); United States v. Hogan, 986 F.2d 1364, 1369 (11th Cir.1993) (“[I]t is the firmly established rule of this Circuit that each succeeding panel is bound by the holding of the first panel to address an issue of law, unless and until that holding is overruled en banc, or by the Supreme Court.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Florida League of Professional Lobbyists, Inc.
v.
Meggs, State Attorney for the Second Judicial Circuit of Florida
v.
Meggs, State Attorney for the Second Judicial Circuit of Florida
No. 96-573.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 2, 1996.
Published
Citer courts: D. South Dakota (2)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.