green
Positive treatment
7.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Fadem Mary O. Fadem v. United States of America, Robert Fadem Mary O. Fadem v. United States of America, Robert Fadem Mary O. Fadem v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Fadem, 520 U.S. 1101 , 117 S.Ct. 1103 , 137 L.Ed.2d 306 (1997). 2 On remand, in case No. 92-56404, we determined that Brockamp did not affect our analysis on equitable tolling.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fadem v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Fadem, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1103 , 137 L.Ed.2d 306 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nos. 96-55358, 96-55892
(2×)
See Fadem v. United States, 52 F.3d 202, 206 (9th Cir.1995), vacated, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 1103 , 137 L.Ed.2d 306 (1997), reinstated, 113 F.3d 167, 168 (9th Cir.1997); Washington v. Garrett, 10 F.3d 1421, 1437 (9th Cir.1993); Johnson v. Shalala, 2 F.3d 918, 923 (9th Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Shalala
(2×)
See Fadem v. United States, 52 F.3d 202, 206 (9th Cir.1995), vacated, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1103 , 137 L.Ed.2d 306 (1997), reinstated, 113 F.3d 167, 168 (9th Cir.1997); Washington v. Garrett, 10 F.3d 1421, 1437 (9th Cir.1993); Johnson v. Shalala, 2 F.3d 918, 923 (9th Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Calhoun County Texas v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., Fadem v. United States, 52 F.3d 202 (9th Cir.1995) (holding that statute of limitations under QTA is not jurisdictional), vacated — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1103 , 137 L.Ed.2d 306 , orig. opinion reinstated 113 F.3d 167 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Krueger v. Saiki, 19 F.3d 1285, 1286 (8th Cir.) (“Because suits against the government are subject to equitable tolling, compliance with [Federal Tort Claims Act] limitations period is not a jurisdictional prerequisite to suing the government.”), cert. denied 513 U.S. 905 , 115 S.Ct. 269 , 130 L.Ed.2d 187 (1994); Schmidt v. United States, 933…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Metropolitan Stevedore Co.
v.
Rambo
v.
Rambo
No. 96-272.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1997.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 519 U. S. 1002.] Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for divided argument granted.