green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.2 score
“cal-almond iii”
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Cal-Almond Inc. v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
cal-almond iii
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Kilaab Al Ghashiyah v. Department of Corrections of Wisconsin
In Sasnett, the court stated: “We defer to the Fifth Circuit’s analysis [in Flores v. City of Boeme ] of why [RFRA] also does not violate the separation of powers or the establishment clause of the First Amendment.” Id. at 1022.
discussed
Cited "see"
Resolute Forest Products, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture
See generally Cal-Almond, Inc, v. Dep’t of Agrie,, 67 F.3d 874 , 879 (9th Cir. 1995), vacated on other grounds, 521 U.S. 1113 , 117 S.Ct. 2501 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1997) (explaining that “[d]espite the celebrated dictum in Marbury ..., not every right comes equipped with a guarantee of individual remediation for every violation of that right”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Preterm-Cleveland, Inc. v. Kasich
See Frank v. United States, 78 F.3d 815 (2d Cir.1996), rev’d on other grounds, 521 U.S. 1114 , 117 S.Ct. 2501 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1997) (the sheriff’s additional workload resulting from compliance with a gun-control statute constituted injury for standing purposes). {¶27} Moreover, Preterm’s changing of policies, protocols, and procedures out of fear of sanctions, or in order to avoid liability, is sufficient for establishing standing.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Candelario
“It is a settled appellate rule that issues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation, are deemed waived.” Tolbert v. Queens College, 242 F.3d 58, 75 (2d Cir.2001) (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks omitted); see Frank v. United States, 78 F.3d 815, 833 (2d Cir.1996), vacated on other grounds by, 521 U.S. 1114 , 117 S.Ct. 2501 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Villareal-Jaramillo v. Gonzales
See Frank v. United States, 78 F.3d 815, 833 (2d Cir.1996), vacated on other grounds, 521 U.S. 1114 , 117 S.Ct. 2501 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hankins v. Lyght - dissent
See Christians v. Crystal Evangelical Free Church (In re Young), 82 F.3d 1407, 1418-19 (8th Cir.1996) (permitting a defendant to assert a RFRA defense and recover debtors’ tithes to the church because "the government action in question meaningfully curtails, albeit retroactively, a religious practice"), vacated, 521 U.S. 1114 , 117 S.Ct. 2502 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1997), reaff'd, 141 F.3d 854 (8th Cir.1998); see also In re Tessier, 190 B.R. 396 (Bankr.D.Mont.1995); Newman v. Midway Southern Baptist Church (In re Newman), 183 B.R. 239 (Bankr.D.Kan.1995), aff'd, 203 B.R. 468 (D.Kan.1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hankins v. Lyght
See Christians v. Crystal Evangelical Free Church (In re Young), 82 F.3d 1407, 1418-19 (8th Cir.1996) (permitting a defendant to assert a RFRA defense and recover debtors' tithes to the church because "the government action in question meaningfully curtails, albeit retroactively, a religious practice"), vacated, 521 U.S. 1114 , 117 S.Ct. 2502 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1997), reaff'd, 141 F.3d 854 (8th Cir. 1998); see also In re Tessier, 190 B.R. 396 (Bankr.D.Mont.1995); Newman v. Midway Southern Baptist Church (In re Newman), 183 B.R. 239 (Bankr.D.Kan.1995), aff'd, 203 B.R. 468 (D.Kan.1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hankins v. Lyght
See Christians v. Crystal Evangelical Free Church (In re Young), 82 F.3d 1407, 1418-19 (8th Cir.1996) (permitting a defendant to assert a RFRA defense and recover debtors' tithes to the church because "the government action in question meaningfully curtails, albeit retroactively, a religious practice"), vacated, 521 U.S. 1114 , 117 S.Ct. 2502 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1997), reaff'd, 141 F.3d 854 (8th Cir.1998); see also In re Tessier, 190 B.R. 396 (Bankr.D.Mont.1995); Newman v. Midway Southern Baptist Church (In re Newman), 183 B.R. 239 (Bankr.D.Kan.1995), aff'd, 203 B.R. 468 (D.Kan.1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tucker v. Calloway County Board Of Education
See, K.R. by M.R. v. Anderson Community School Corp., 887 F.Supp. 1217 (S.D.Ind.1995), rev'd, 81 F.3d 673 (7th Cir.1996), cert. granted and judgment vacated, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 2502 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1997), on remand, 125 F.3d 1017 (7th Cir.1997), petition for cert. filed, 66 USLW 3428 (U.S. Dec. 9, 1997) (No. 97-960); Russman by Russman v. Board of Educ. of Enlarged City School Dist. of City of Watervliet, N.Y., 945 F.Supp. 37 (N.D.N.Y.1995), aff'd, 85 F.3d 1050 (2d Cir.1996), cert. granted and judgment vacated, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 2502 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1008 (1997); Fowler v. Unifie…
cited
Cited "see"
John C. Norton v. Sam's Club, Wal-Mart Corp., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
See Frank v. United States, 78 F.3d 815, 832-33 (2d Cir.1996), vacated on other grounds, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2501 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Christians v. Crystal Evangelical Free Church (In Re Young)
See Christians v. Crystal Evangelical Free Church, _ U.S. _, _, 117 S.Ct. 2502, 2502 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Young
See Christians v. Crystal Evangelical Free Church, --- U.S. ----, ----, 117 S.Ct. 2502, 2502 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Magic Valley Evangelical Free Church, Inc. v. Fitzgerald (In Re Hodge)
See id. at _, 117 S.Ct. at 2162. 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Tucker v. Calloway County Board of Education
See, K.R. by M.R. v. Anderson Community School Corp., 887 F.Supp. 1217 (S.D.Ind.1995), rev'd, 81 F.3d 673 (7th Cir.1996), cert. granted and judgment vacated,-U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 2502 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1997), on remand, 125 F.3d 1017 (7th Cir.1997), petition for cert. filed, 66 USLW 3428 (U.S. Dec. 9, 1997) (No. 97-960); Russman by Russman v. Board of Educ. of Enlarged City School Dist. of City of Watervliet, N.Y., 945 F.Supp. 37 (N.D.N.Y.1995), aff'd, 85 F.3d 1050 (2d Cir.1996), cert. granted and judgment vacated, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2502 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1008 (1997); Fowler v. Unified School Di…
cited
Cited "see"
City of New York v. United States
See Frank v. United States, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2501 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ackerson v. City of White Plains
See Tolbert v. Queens College, 242 F.3d 58, 76 (2d Cir.2001); see also Frank v. United States, 78 F.3d 815, 833 (2d Cir.1996), vacated on other grounds by, 521 U.S. 1114 , 117 S.Ct. 2501 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Siddiqui
See Tolbert v. Queens College, 242 F.3d 58, 76 (2d Cir.2001); see also Frank v. United States, 78 F.3d 815, 833 (2d Cir.1996), vacated on other grounds by, 521 U.S. 1114 , 117 S.Ct. 2501 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1997). 13 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Walker, Curtis v. McCaughtry, Gary
See Rios v. Lane, 812 F.2d 1032, 1037 (7th Cir.1987) (upholding regulation preventing gang activity even under earlier intermediate standard that re *462 quired a substantial state interest addressed through the narrowest possible means); see also Sasnett v. Sullivan, 91 F.3d 1018, 1023 (7th Cir.1996), vacated on other grounds, 521 U.S. 1114 , 117 S.Ct. 2502 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles v. Frank
And since suppressing gang activity to promote a secure and safe prison environment is indisputably a compelling interest, see Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 546 , 99 S.Ct. 1861 , 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979); Pell v. Procunier, 417 U.S. 817, 822-23 , 94 S.Ct. 2800 , 41 L.Ed.2d 495 (1974); Rios v. Lane, 812 F.2d 1032, 1037 (7th Cir.1987); see also Sasnett v. Sullivan, 91 F.3d 1018, 1023 (7th Cir.1996), vacated on other grounds, 521 U.S. 1114 , 117 S.Ct. 2502 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1997), the only issue here is whether the defendants are furthering that interest through the least restrictive means.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Department of Agriculture
v.
Cal-Almond, Inc.
v.
Cal-Almond, Inc.
No. 95-1879.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 1997.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment va[*1114] cated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Glickman v. Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc., ante, p. 457.