Enercon Indus. Corp. v. Pillar Corp., 521 U.S. 1121 (1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Enercon Indus. Corp. v. Pillar Corp., 521 U.S. 1121 (1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“e have discovered no indication that the rule in regulatory takings cases differs from the general eminent domain framework”
22 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of Groton (conn, 2002-11-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of Groton
Conn. · 2002 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
e have discovered no indication that the rule in regulatory takings cases differs from the general eminent domain framework
discussed Cited "see" Hawkins v. State
Tex. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ex parte Mowbray, 943 S.W.2d 461 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 .S.Ct. 2513, 138 L.Ed.2d 1016 (1997); Ex parte Brandley, 781 S.W.2d 886, 887 (Tex.Crim. *771 App.1989); Ex parte Adams, 768 S.W.2d 281 (Tex.Crim.App.1989).
cited Cited "see" Ware v. United States
M.D. Fla. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See McMillian v. Johnson, 88 F.3d 1554 , 1567 n. 12 (11th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2514 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1016 (1997).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Andres C.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., Kyles v. Whitley, supra, 514 U.S. 437 ; State v. Guerrera, supra, 331 Conn. 647 , 656; see also, e.g., McMillian v. Johnson, 88 F.3d 1554, 1567 (11th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1121 , 117 S. Ct. 2514 , 138 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Redmond v. Bankester
Ala. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
Jones v. Blanton, 644 So.2d 882 (Ala.1994); see also McMillian v. Johnson, 878 F.Supp. 1473, 1520 (M.D.Ala.1995) ("It is noteworthy that Alabama has not followed the trend of abolishing the requirement that parties be identical, sometimes referred to as the mutuality of estoppel requirement."), rev'd in part on other grounds, 88 F.3d 1554 (11th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1121 , 117 S.Ct. 2514 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1016 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Enercon Industries Corp.
v.
Pillar Corp.
No. 96-1745.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 1997.
521 U.S. 1121
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 63%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1)

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.