green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.6 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Nelson v. State
in this case, the trial judge properly rejected the proposition that by killing persons in order to prevent them from performing legal abortions, hill acted under a pretense of moral justification.
discussed
Cited "see"
Staver v. American Bar Ass'n
See Massachusetts School of Law at Andover v. American Bar Ass’n, 107 F.3d 1026, 1030 (3d Cir.) (“Many states have methods of satisfying the legal education requirement other than graduation from an ABA-accredited school.”), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 907 , 118 S.Ct. 264 , 139 L.Ed.2d 191 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bozeman v. State
See Hill v. State, 688 So.2d 901 , 905 n. 4 (Fla.1996), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ____, 118 S.Ct. 265 , 139 L.Ed.2d 191 (1997); Jenks v. State, 582 So.2d 676, 679 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 589 So.2d 292 (Fla.1991); Marrero v. State, 516 So.2d 1052, 1054-55 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zakrzewski v. State
See Hill v. State, 688 So.2d 901, 907 (Fla.1996), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 118 S.Ct. 265 , 139 L.Ed.2d 191 (1997) (stating that "[n]o one may take the life of another indiscriminately, regardless of what that person may perceive as justification" (quoting Dougan v. State, 595 So.2d 1, 6 (Fla.1992))).
cited
Cited "see"
Maddox v. State ex rel. Golden
See Hill v. State, 688 So.2d 901, 908 (Fla.1996) (Anstead, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 265 , 139 L.Ed.2d 191 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Beaton v. State
See Godinez v. Moran, 509 U.S. 389, 399 , 113 S.Ct. 2680, 2686 , 125 L.Ed.2d 321 (1993) ( quoted in Hill v. State, 688 So.2d 901, 905 (Fla.1996), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 118 S.Ct. 265 , 139 L.Ed.2d 191 (1997)).
cited
Cited "see"
Santrayall v. Burrell
See Fonar Corp. v. Domenick, 105 F.3d 99, 105 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 265 , 139 L.Ed.2d 191 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Klamath Irrigation District v. the United States 01-591l and 01-5910l Through 01
See also Tank Insulation Int'l, Inc. v. Insultherm, Inc., 104 F.3d 83, 85-86 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 907 , 118 S.Ct. 265 , 139 L.Ed.2d 191 (1997) (two claims satisfy the transaction-or-occurrence test where, inter alia, the issues of fact and law "largely are the same” and “whether substantially the same evidence” will support or refute the claims); Third Degree Films v. Does 1-47, 286 F.R.D. 188, 194 (D.Mass.2012). 50 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Reeves v. State
See Bowen, 698 So.2d at 250-51 ; see also Hill v. State, 688 So.2d 901, 904-05 (Fla.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 907 , 118 S.Ct. 265 , 139 L.Ed.2d 191 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Texas Instruments, Inc. v. Hyundai Electronics Industries, Co.
Co. v. Automotive Maintenance Machinery Co., 324 U.S. 806, 815 , 65 S.Ct. 993, 998 , 89 L.Ed. 1381 (1945), quoting from Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 246 , 64 S.Ct. 997 , 88 L.Ed. 1250 (1944)); see also Tank Insulation Intern. v. Insultherm, 104 F.3d 83 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 907 , 118 S.Ct. 265 , 139 L.Ed.2d 191 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Potts v. State
See also Hill v. State, 688 So.2d 901, 905 (Fla.1996) ("The competence that is required of a defendant seeking to waive his right to counsel is the competence to waive the right, not the competence to represent himself."), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 118 S.Ct. 265 , 139 L.Ed.2d 191 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Idaho
In this respect, the Idaho Statehood Act “operated to confirm [Idaho’s] title to equal footing lands ... unless the United States clearly withheld submerged lands ... prior to statehood.” Alaska, 117 S.Ct. at 1917 ; see also United States v. Gardner, 107 F.3d 1314, 1319-20 (9th Cir.1997) (explaining that .disclaimer clause is a recognition of preexisting United States title), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 907 , 118 S.Ct. 264 , 139 L.Ed.2d 191 (1997); cf. Aam, 887 F.2d at 198 (concluding that submerged lands were not “held” by tribe within meaning of disclaimer clause because tribe had not s…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gibson Tex, Inc. v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
However, under the doctrine of fraud on the Copyright Office, the presumption of validity [of the copyright] may only be overcome by “proof of deliberate misrepresentation.” Whimsicality, Inc. v. Rubie’s Costume Co., Inc., 891 F.2d 452, 455 (2d Cir.1989); see also Fonar Corp. v. Domenick, 105 F.3d 99, 105 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 265 , 139 L.Ed.2d 191 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nobelpharma AB v. Implant Innovations, Inc.
Compare Tank Insulation Int'l, Inc. v. Insultherm, Inc., 104 F.3d 83 , 88 & n. 5, 41 USPQ2d 1545, 1549 & n. 5 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 265 , 139 L.Ed.2d 191 (1997), and Hydranautics v. FilmTec Corp., 70 F.3d 533, 536-37 , 36 USPQ2d 1773, 1775 (9th Cir.1995) ("A claim that patent infringement litigation violated an antitrust statute is a permissive, not a mandatory, counterclaim in a patent infringement case, and is not barred in a subsequent suit by failure to raise it in the infringement suit.” (citing Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Inv.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Calderon, Warden
v.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (Gordon, Real Party in Interest)
v.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (Gordon, Real Party in Interest)
No. 97-31.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1997.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Florida (2)
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of[*908] respondent Patrick Bruce Gordon for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.