green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.0 score
“hen ... a state gives identified victims of state discrimination that were wrongly denied them, the beneficiaries are not granted a preference 'on the basis of race' but on the basis that they have been individually wronged.”
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Green v. Veneman
hen ... a state gives identified victims of state discrimination that were wrongly denied them, the beneficiaries are not granted a preference 'on the basis of race' but on the basis that they have been individually wronged.
cited
Cited "see"
Vehicular Technologies Corporation v. Titan Wheel International
See Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk, A/S, 108 F.3d 1361, 1364 , 42 USPQ2d 1001, 1003 (Fed.Cir.) (Novo Nordisk II ), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 397 , 139 L.Ed.2d 310 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Vehicular Technologies Corp. v. Titan Wheel International, Inc.
See Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk, AJS, 108 F.3d 1361, 1364 , 42 USPQ2d 1001, 1003 (Fed.Cir.) (Novo Nordisk II), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 397 , 139 L.Ed.2d 310 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Genentech, Inc. v. Boehringer Mannheim GmbH
See Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk, 108 F.3d 1361, 1365 (Fed.Cir.1997) (invalidating patent for failure of specification to enable practice of claimed method), cert. denied, —U.S. ---, 118 S.Ct. 397 , 139 L.Ed.2d 310 (1997); Genentech, Inc. v. Wellcome Foundation, Ltd., 29 F.3d 1555, 1564 (Fed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chemical Separation Technology, Inc. v. United States
See Space Systems/Loral, Inc., 271 F.3d at 1080-81 ; see also Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S, 108 F.3d 1361, 1365 (Fed.Cir.1997) (“To be enabling, the specification of a patent must teach those skilled in the art how to make and use the full scope of the claimed invention without ‘undue experimentation.’ ”), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 963 , 118 S.Ct. 397 , 139 L.Ed.2d 310 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Novo Nordisk A/S v. Becton Dickinson & Co.
Validity ofthe-Patents At the preliminary injunction stage, Novo as the patentee, carries the burden of showing likelihood of success on the merits with respect to the patent’s validity, enforceability, and infringement. 23 Nutrition 21, 930 F.2d at 869 ; see also Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk, A/S, 108 F.3d 1361 , 1364 n. 2 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 397 , 139 L.Ed.2d 310 (1997); Bio-Technology Gen.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Commonwealth Secretary of Virginia
v.
Miserandino et ux.
v.
Miserandino et ux.
No. 97-27.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 3, 1997.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. Mississippi (1)
Gt. App. Md. Motions of Virginia Creditors Bar Association and Virginia Credit Union League for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.