green
Positive treatment
1.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Williams
See, e.g., State v. Clemons, 946 S.W.2d 206, 224 (Mo.banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 968 , 118 S.Ct. 416 , 139 L.Ed.2d 318 (1997); State v. Taylor, 944 S.W.2d 925, 936 (Mo. banc 1997); State v. Ervin, 835 S.W.2d 905, 921 (Mo. banc 1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hawkins v. Trustees of Indiana University
See White v. York Int’l Corp., 45 F.3d 357, 360-61 (10th Cir.1995); see also Leffel v. Valley Financial Servs., 113 F.3d 787, 793 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 968 , 118 *993 S.Ct. 416, 139 L.Ed.2d 318 (1997).
Sascho, Inc.
v.
DAP Products, Inc.
v.
DAP Products, Inc.
No. 97-436.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 10, 1997.
Published
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.