green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Lazo-Ortiz
But see United States v. Adkins, 102 F.3d 111, 113 (4th Cir.1996), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 83 , 139 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997) (holding that "offenses” in effective date provision referred to illegal reentiy, not offense that led to deportation); United States v. Garcia-Rico, 46 F.3d 8, 10 (5th Cir.1995) (same).
cited
Cited "see"
Thomas v. Polk
See State v. Thomas, 344 N.C. 639 , 477 S.E.2d 450 (1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 118 S.Ct. 84 , 139 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, Cross-Appellant/appellee v. Angel Velazquez, Cross-Appellee/appellant
See United States v. Prior, 107 F.3d 654 (8th Cir.1997), ce rt. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 118 S.Ct. 84 , 139 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, Cross-Appellant/appellee v. Angel Velazquez, Cross-Appellee/appellant
See United States v. Prior, 107 F.3d 654 (8th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 118 S.Ct. 84 , 139 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. K.R.A.
See United States v. Female Juvenile, 103 F.3d 14, 17 (5th Cir.1996) (“It is nonsensical to suppose that as a defendant draws nearer the age of twenty-one, the allowable penalty that a court may impose for violation of probation shrinks correspondingly.”), cer t. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 118 S.Ct. 83 , 139 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997); see also United States v. G.C.A., 83 F.Supp.2d 253, 254-55 (D.P.R.2000) (concurring with Fifth Circuit’s analysis of § 5037).
cited
Cited "see"
Antonio Brown v. United States
See United States v. Prior, 107 F.3d 654, 660 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 118 S.Ct. 84 , 139 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert A. Holman, Also Known as Birna Shaw
See United States v. Prior, 107 F.3d 654, 660 (8th Cir.) (one panel of this court is not at liberty to overrule another panel’s decision), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 118 S.Ct. 84 , 139 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997); United States v. Bates, 77 F.3d 1101, 1103-04 (8th Cir.) (finding application of § 922(g) to defendant who merely possessed firearm that traveled in interstate commerce was “eminently constitutional”), cer t. denied, 519 U.S. 884 , 117 S.Ct. 215 , 136 L.Ed.2d 149 (1996); United States v. Shelton, 66 F.3d 991, 992 (8th Cir.1995) (per curiam) (to satisfy interstate commerce element of �…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Blackwell
See State v. Thomas, 329 N.C. 423, 439 , 407 S.E.2d 141, 151 (1991), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 139 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eddie Williams, Jr.
See United States v. Prior, 107 F.3d 654, 660 (8th Cir.) (one Eighth Circuit panel may not overrule another panel's decision), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 84 , 139 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997). 3 Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. 1 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph J. Reed
(2×)
See United States v. Prior, 107 F.3d 654, 660-61 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 84 , 139 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997); United States v. Gonzales, 79 F.3d 413, 426-27 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 183 , 136 L.Ed.2d 122 (1996); United States v. Arango-Montoya, 61 F.3d 1331, 1338 (7th Cir. 1995); United States v. McChristian, 47 F.3d 1499, 1503 (9th Cir.1995); and United States v. Williams, 954 F.2d 668, 673 (11th Cir. 1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodney Wassem Mahto, Also Known as Rodney Wassem Larson, Also Known as Rodney Wassem Mahto
See United States v. Prior, 107 F.3d 654, 660 (8th Cir.) (one Eighth Circuit panel may not overrule another panel's decision), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 84 , 139 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997). 5 Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. 1 The Honorable Patrick A. Conmy, United States District Judge for the District of North Dakota 2 We reject the government's suggestion that this appeal should be dismissed based on Mahto's purported waiver of his right to appeal.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Duvall
See United States v. Female Juvenile, 103 F.3d 14, 16-17 (5th Cir.1996) (“Axiomatic in statutory interpretation is the principle that laws should be construed to avoid an absurd or unreasonable result.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 83 , 139 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Minor
See e.g., State v. Thomas, 329 N.C. 423, 438 , 407 S.E.2d 141, 151 (1991), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 139 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Albano Santos
v.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
v.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
No. 96-8501.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1997.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.