green
Positive treatment
10.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Kerr Carrington.
See Commonwealth v. Tate, 424 Mass. 236, 240 , cert. denied, 522 U.S. 832 (1997). 6 The panelists are listed in order of seniority. 6
discussed
Cited "see"
Hiram Rios v. State
(2×)
Hammer v. State, 296 S.W.3d 555, 568 (Tex.Crim.App. 2009); see Allen v. State, 108 S.W.3d 281, 284 (Tex.Crim.App. 2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1185 , 124 S.Ct. 1405 , 158 L.Ed.2d 90 (2004), citing Jones v. State, 944 S.W.2d 642, 652-53 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 832 , 118 S.Ct. 100 , 139 L.Ed.2d 54 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kelly Munn v. State
See id. ; see also Douglas v. State , No. 05-06-00198-CR, 2006 WL 3742902 , at *3 (Tex. App.—Dallas Dec. 21, 2006) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (noting that a jury was free to decide if a witness testified truthfully or was influenced by his agreement with the State), cert. denied , 552 U.S. 1246 (2008).
cited
Cited "see"
Poe v. Sex Offender Registry Board
See Commonwealth v. Tate, 424 Mass. 236, 239 , cert, denied, 522 U.S. 832 (1997).
examined
Cited "see"
Warner v. State
(4×)
See Johnson v. State, 1996 OK CR 36 , ¶ 42, 928 P.2d 309, 318 , cert. denied, 522 U.S. 832 , 118 S.Ct. 99 , 139 L.Ed.2d 54 (1997). ¶ 135 The record reflects no objection was raised to the instruction given in this case regarding the "especially heinous, atrocious or cruel" aggravator.
discussed
Cited "see"
Huse v. State
(2×)
See Jones v. State, 944 S.W.2d 642 , 650 n. 11 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. den'd, 522 U.S. 832 , 118 S.Ct. 100 , 139 L.Ed.2d 54 (1997). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
Carl Raymond Hathaway v. State
See Jones v. State, 944 S.W.2d 642, 647 (Tex.Cr.App.1996), cert. den’d, 522 U.S. 832 (1997); Pieringer v. State, 139 S.W.3d 713, 723 (Tex.App. - Fort Worth 2004, no pet’n h.).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pieringer v. State
(2×)
See Jones v. State, 944 S.W.2d 642, 647 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 832 , 118 S.Ct. 100 , 139 L.Ed.2d 54 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Timothy L. Phillips v. State
(2×)
See Jones v. State, 944 S.W.2d 642, 647-48 (Tex.Cr.App. 1996), cert. denied , 522 U.S. 832 , 118 S.Ct. 100 , 139 L.Ed.2d 54 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Gilford, Coty Demond v. State
See Jones v. State , 944 S.W.2d 642, 647 (1996), cert. denied , 522 U.S. 832 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eduardo Alvarado v. State
(2×)
See Jones v. State, 944 S.W.2d 642, 647-48 (Tex.Cr.App. 1996), cert. denied , 522 U.S. 832 , 118 S.Ct. 100 , 139 L.Ed.2d 54 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eduardo Alvarado v. State
(2×)
See Jones v. State, 944 S.W.2d 642, 647-48 (Tex.Cr.App. 1996), cert. denied , 522 U.S. 832 , 118 S.Ct. 100 , 139 L.Ed.2d 54 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. State
(2×)
See Jones v. State, 944 S.W.2d 642, 653 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 832 , 118 S.Ct. 100 , 139 L.Ed.2d 54 (1997); Lemmons v. State, 75 S.W.3d 513, 524-25 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2002, pet. ref'd); Rankin v. State, 995 S.W.2d 210, 215 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist] 1999, pet. ref'd).
examined
Cited "see"
Thompson v. State
(4×)
See Jones v. State, 944 S.W.2d 642, 647 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 832 , 118 S.Ct. 100 , 139 L.Ed.2d 54 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Conner v. State
(2×)
See Jones v. State, 944 S.W.2d 642, 647 (Tex. Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 832 , 118 S.Ct. 100 , 139 L.Ed.2d 54 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rivera v. State
(2×)
See, Jones v. State, 944 S.W.2d 642 (Tex.Crim.App.1996) cert den., 522 U.S. 832 , 118 S.Ct. 100 , 139 L.Ed.2d 54 (1997). *275 In considering factual sufficiency, neither the key to the apartment nor Rivera’s clothing was confiscated by the police and kept for evidence.
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. State
(2×)
See Jones v. State, 944 S.W.2d 642, 647 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), ce rt. denied, 522 U.S. 832 , 118 S.Ct. 100 , 139 L.Ed.2d 54 (1997); Barnes v. State, 876 S.W.2d 316, 321 (Tex.Crim.App.), ce rt. denied, 513 U.S. 861 , 115 S.Ct. 174 , 130 L.Ed.2d 110 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Bruno
See Commonwealth v. Tate, 424 Mass. 236, 239 , cert. denied, 522 U.S. 832 (1997); Hill, petitioner, 422 Mass. 147, 153-154 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 867 (1996); Commonwealth v. Barboza, 387 Mass. 105, 111-112 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1020 (1982).
examined
Cited "see"
Franco v. State
(4×)
See Jones v. State, 944 S.W.2d 642, 650 (Tex. Crim.App.1996), cert denied, 522 U.S. 832 , 118 S.Ct. 100 , 139 L.Ed.2d 54 (1997).
examined
Cited "see"
Childress v. State
(3×)
See Johnson v. State, 1996 OK CR 36 , ¶ 9, 928 P.2d 309, 314 , cert. denied, 522 U.S. 832 , 118 S.Ct. 99 , 189 L.Ed.2d 54 (1997).
examined
Cited "see"
Johnson v. State
(4×)
See Jones v. State, 944 S.W.2d 642, 647-48 (Tex.Cr.App.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 832 , 118 S.Ct. 100 , 139 L.Ed.2d 54 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Saldivar v. State
See Jones v. State, 944 S.W.2d 642, 655 (Tex.Crim.App.1996) (stating appellant's burden to object if bench conferences are not held within hearing of court reporter or not recorded), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 100 , 139 L.Ed.2d 54 (1997). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
Stevenson v. State
See Jones v. State, 944 S.W.2d 642, 652-53 (Tex. Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 100 , 139 L.Ed.2d 54 (1997); Beasley v. State, 902 S.W.2d 452, 457 (Tex.Crim.
discussed
Cited "see"
Moore v. State
(2×)
See Jones v. State, 944 S.W.2d 642, 647 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert, denied, — U.S. ——, 118 S.Ct. 100 , 139 L.Ed.2d 54 (1997)(intent to kill inferable from use of deadly weapon); Butler v. State, 769 S.W.2d 234, 240 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), overruled on other grounds by, Geesa v. State, 820 S.W.2d 154, 161 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991) (intent to steal inferable from the fact that defendant entered a cab with a loaded .38 revolver only two blocks from his residence, executed the cab driver, and reached the front seat and ransacked the pocket of the decedent); Lewis v. State, 715 S.W.2d 655, 657 (Tex.Cr…
discussed
Cited "see"
Galvez v. State
See Jones v. State, 944 S.W.2d 642, 652-53 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 100 , 139 L.Ed.2d 54 (1997); Anderson v. State, 901 S.W.2d 946, 950 (Tex.Crim.App.1995); see also Tex.R.Crim.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pope v. State
(2×)
Evid. 403; see also Jones v. State, 944 S.W.2d 642, 651 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 832 , 118 S.Ct. 100 , 139 L.Ed.2d 54 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
George v. State
(2×)
Rankin, 1996 WL 165014, at *7 , at -; see also Jones v. State, 944 S.W.2d 642, 653 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 100 , 139 L.Ed.2d 54 (1997). “[L]ogic demands that the instruction be given at the first opportunity.” Rankin, 1996 WL 165014, at *5 , at -. “ ‘Once evidence is received without a proper limiting instruction, it becomes part of the general evidence in the case and may be used as proof to the full extent of its rational persuasive power.’ ” Johnson, 1997 WL 209527 , at *11, at - (quoting Garcia v. State, 887 S.W.2d 862, 878 (Tex.Crim.App.1994))…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williams
v.
Allstate Insurance Co.
v.
Allstate Insurance Co.
No. 96-9093.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1997.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.