green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.8 score
“fisher ii”
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Dorothy Kovacevich v. Kent State University
But cf. Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1389 (2d Cir.1997) (en banc) (Winter, J., dissenting) (explaining why “[i]n reality ... there is no such thing as a silent defendant”), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Rock v. T.N.H.D. Partners, LLC
See, Fisher v. Vassar College, 70 F.3d 1420, 1448 (2d Cir.1995), on reh’g en banc, 114 F.3d 1332 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rebelo
See United States v. Banks, 115 F.3d 916, 919 (11th Cir.1997) (“The statute [Section 2462] is enforced against the government only when the government is acting to vindicate private interests, not a sovereign or public interest.”), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 852 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998); United States v. Telluride Co., 146 F.3d 1241 , 1248-49 (10th Cir.1998) (citing Banks); cf. Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
SEC v. Joseph D. Radcliffe
(2×)
See United States v. Banks, 115 F.3d 916, 919 (11th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 852 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Calvo
(2×)
See United States v. Banks, 115 F.3d 916, 919 (11th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 852 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Dana R. Derungs Devin Derungs, a Minor Jennifer Gore Austin Gore, a Minor Angie Baird Kassidee Baird, a Minor v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
See, Fisher v. Vassar College, 70 F.3d 1420, 1448 (2d Cir.1995), on reh'g en banc, 114 F.3d 1332 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998). 9 .
cited
Cited "see"
John Saulsberry v. St. Mary's University of Minnesota, a Minnesota Non-Profit Educational Institution
See Feltmann v. Sieben, 108 F.3d 970, 975 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Kwai Wing Wong v. City of New York
See Fisher v. Vassar, 114 F.3d 1332, 1337 (2d Cir.1997) (in banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kessler
See United States v. Earles, 113 F.3d 796, 800 (8th Cir.1997) (holding that grand jury testimony, although inadmissible under other hearsay exceptions, “may ... be considered for admission under the catch-all exception”), cer t. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cavalier Clothes, Inc. v. United States
See Amertex Enterprises Ltd. v. United States, 1995 WL 925961 at * 65 (1995), aff'd, 108 F.3d 1392 (Fed.Cir.1997) (table), cert denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998); Grumman Aerospace Corp., 2001 WL 146691 (A.S.B.C.A.2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Pace v. Paris Maintenance Co.
See id. 0citing Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1335 (2d Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Catherine Papajohn
See United States v. Earles, 113 F.3d 796, 802 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Ofudu v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.
See Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1335-36 (2d Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Menes v. CUNY University of New York
See id. (citing Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1335 (2d Cir.1997) (in banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald G. Stevens
See United States v. Sabian, 114 F.3d 913, 916 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc) (citing Koon v. United States, 518 U.S. 81, 98-100 , 116 S.Ct. 2035 , 135 L.Ed.2d 392 (1996)), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Byrnie v. Town of Cromwell Public Schools
See Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332 , 1335 & 1340 n. 7 (2d Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998); Chambers v. TRM Copy Ctrs.
discussed
Cited "see"
Anderson v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
“Any such stated purpose is sufficient to satisfy the defendant’s burden of production; the employer does not have to persuade the court that the stated purpose was the actual reason for its decision.” Austin, 149 F.3d at 153 ; see Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1335-36 (2d Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Kristen Dhyne, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross v. Meiners Thriftway, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/cross
See Feltmann v. Sieben, 108 F.3d 970, 976 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Firgeleski v. Hubbell, Inc.
See Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1335-1336 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998). *198 Even assuming, arguendo, that plaintiff has established a prima facie case that raises the inference of age discrimination, plaintiffs claim will not succeed.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Velez
See United States v. Sablan, 114 F.3d 913 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998); United States v. Roston, 168 F.3d 377, 378 (9th Cir.1999) (stating that review of upward departure “is highly deferential on appeal”).
cited
Cited "see"
Mescall v. Marra
See id. (citing Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1335 (2d Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998)).
cited
Cited "see"
Robin L. Tuttle v. Missouri Department Of Agriculture
See Feltmann v. Sieben, 108 F.3d 970, 975 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998); Serben v. Inter-City Mfg.
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eugene Davis WASHINGTON, Defendant-Appellant
(2×)
See United States v. Sablan, 114 F.3d 913, 916 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Tuttle v. Missouri Department of Agriculture
See Feltmann v. Sieben, 108 F.3d 970, 975 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998); Serben v. Inter-City Mfg.
discussed
Cited "see"
O'SULLIVAN v. New York Times
See Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332 , 1340 & n. 7 (2d Cir.1997) (in banc) (collecting cases), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998); Wernick v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 91 F.3d 379, 383 (2d Cir.1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
John J. Lennon v. Robert Rubin, Secretary of the Treasury
See Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1337 (2d Cir.1997) (en banc) (“Individual decision-makers may intentionally dissemble in order to hide a reason that is non-discriminatory but unbecoming or small-minded, such as backscratching, log-rolling, horse-trading, institutional politics, envy, nepotism, spite, or personal hostility.”), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Terry J. Artis v. Francis Howell North Band Booster Association, Inc. Francis Howell R-Iii School District Joseph Stacy
See Feltmann v. Sieben, 108 F.3d 970, 977 (8th Cir.1997) (noting a claim for punitive damages must fail where there is no support for the underlying claims), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Hall v. South Central Connecticut Regional Water Authority
See Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1337 (2d Cir. 1997) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998); Woroski v. Nashua Corp., 31 F.3d 105, 109-10 (2d Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Miguel Sanchez-Rodriguez
(2×)
See United States v. Sablan, 114 F.3d 913, 916 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc) (citing Koon v. United States, 518 U.S. 81, 98-100 , 116 S.Ct. 2035 , 135 L.Ed.2d 392 (1996)), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Naftchi v. New York University
See Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1335 (2d Cir.1997) (in banc), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998) (ADEA); Raskin v. Wyatt Co., 125 F.3d 55, 60 (2d Cir.1997) (N.Y.EXEC.L. § 296); O’Malley v. AIDS Institute, No. 95 Civ. 5561(PKJL), 1996 WL 447748 , at *4 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert L. Sims
On the basis of "an aggravating ... circumstance of a kind, or to a degree, not adequately taken into consideration by the Sentencing Commission," the district court may depart upward from the sentencing range set forth in U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4, p.s. 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (b); see United States v. Sablan, 114 F.3d 913, 916 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Samuel Ray Engstrom
The district court may depart upward from the sentencing range on the basis of "an aggravating ... circumstance of a kind, or to a degree, not adequately taken into consideration by the Sentencing Commission." 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (b); see United States v. Sablan, 114 F.3d 913, 916-17 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998). 3 Here, pending the hearing on the petition for revocation of Engstrom's supervised release, the district court ordered him released on condition of electronic monitoring.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dwayne E. Speicer
See United States v. Sablan, 114 F.3d 913, 916 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998). 2 Speicher contends that the district court abused its discretion in departing upwards from U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4 to facilitate a perceived need for drug rehabilitation.
cited
Cited "see"
Danny T. Greenway v. The Buffalo Hilton Hotel, Cross-Appellee
See Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1335 (2d Cir.1997) (in banc), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jorge Viveros-Castro
See United States v. Sablan, 114 F.3d 913, 916 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998). 4 In calculating Viveros-Castro's sentence, the district court departed upward two levels based on the dangerous and inhumane treatment of the aliens transported.
discussed
Cited "see"
Butler v. New York State Department of Law
See Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1335 (2d Cir.1997) (en banc), cert denied — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 ; American Federation of State v. County of Nassau, 96 F.3d 644 , 651 (2d Cir.1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Payne v. State of New York Power Authority
See Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1338 (2d Cir.1997) (“the sufficiency of the finding of pretext to support a finding of discrimination depends on the circumstances of the case”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lew v. Radiation Dynamics, Inc.
See Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1339 (2d Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998); Bridgeport Guardians, Inc. v. City of Bridgeport, 933 F.2d 1140 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 924 , 112 S.Ct. 337 , 116 L.Ed.2d 277 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Singh v. New York State Department of Taxation & Finance
Mary’s Honor Ctr., 509 U.S. at 510-11 , 113 S.Ct. 2742 ); see also Fisher v. Vassar Coll., 114 F.3d 1332, 1336 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Abdallah v. Napolitano
Mary’s Honor Ctr., 509 U.S. at 510-11 , 113 S.Ct. 2742 ); see also Fisher v. Vassar Coll., 114 F.3d 1332, 1336 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
M.O.C.H.A. Society, Inc. v. City of Buffalo
Mary’s Honor Ctr., 509 U.S. at 510-11 , 113 S.Ct. 2742 ); see also Fisher v. Vassar Coll., 114 F.3d 1332, 1336 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paula A. Kipp, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission, Appellant/cross-Appellee
Penney Co., 75 F.3d 343 , 346-47 (8th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 813 , 117 S.Ct. 61 , 136 L.Ed.2d 23 (1996); see also Feltmann v. Sieben, 108 F.3d 970, 977 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998); Cram v. Lamson and Sessions Co., 49 F.3d 466, 474 (8th Cir.1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James M. Laster (99-6244) and Jerry Lear (99-6247)
See also, e.g., United States v. Earles, 113 F.3d 796, 800 (8th Cir.1997) (holding that grand jury testimony, although inadmissible under other hearsay exceptions, “may ... be considered for admission under the catch-all exception”), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998); United States v. Marchini, 797 F.2d 759, 764 (9th Cir.1986) (holding that grand jury testimony was admissible under the residual exception), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1085 , 107 S.Ct. 1288 , 94 L.Ed.2d 145 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hamad v. Nassau County Medical Center
Mary’s Honor Ctr. v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502, 506 , 113 S.Ct. 2742 , 125 L.Ed.2d 407 (1993)); see also Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1335 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
La Marco v. New York State Nurses Ass'n
See, e.g., Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1337 (2d Cir.1997) (noting that a person’s actions such as “back-scratching, log-rolling, horse-trading, institutional politics, envy, nepotism, spite, or personal hostility” may be unbecoming or small-minded, but nondiscriminatory.), cer t. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bombero v. Warner-Lambert Co.
Id. at 511 & 517, 113 S.Ct. 2742 ; see also Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1339 (2d Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998). 1.Prima Facie Case To establish a prima facie case, plaintiff must show that at the time of the challenged action he was: 1) in the protected age group; 2) qualified for the position at issue; 3) not hired for the position; and 4) denied the position in circumstances giving rise to an inference of age discrimination.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roman v. Cornell University
See, e.g., Fisher v. Vassar College, 70 F.3d 1420, 1439 (2d Cir.1995) (Stating that a person’s “ ‘sense of being discriminated against’ is not evidence.”), rehearing en banc, 114 F.3d 1332 , cert. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Valentine v. Standard & Poor's
“If the defendant carries this burden of production, the presumption raised by the prima facie case is rebutted, and the factual inquiry proceeds to a new level of specificity.” Id. at 255 , 101 S.Ct. 1089 ; see also Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1337 (2d Cir.1997) (en banc) (“presumption disappears once employer has proffered a reason”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998); Hawkins v. Astor Home for Children, 96 Civ. 8778(SS), 1998 WL 142134 , at *5 (S.D.N.Y.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sablan
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 97-382.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 20, 1998.
Published
Citer courts: N.D. New York (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.