green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.6 score
“the blockburger test is insufficient where . . . the concern is not multiple charges under separate statutes, but rather successive prosecutions for conduct that may constitute the same act or transaction”
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 37 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Dorothy Kovacevich v. Kent State University
(2×)
But cf. Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1389 (2d Cir.1997) (en banc) (Winter, J., dissenting) (explaining why “[i]n reality ... there is no such thing as a silent defendant”), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Rabb
the blockburger test is insufficient where . . . the concern is not multiple charges under separate statutes, but rather successive prosecutions for conduct that may constitute the same act or transaction
cited
Cited "see"
Bromfield v. Bronx Lebanon Special Care Center, Inc.
See Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332 , 1335–37 (2d Cir. 1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Rock v. T.N.H.D. Partners, LLC
See, Fisher v. Vassar College, 70 F.3d 1420, 1448 (2d Cir.1995), on reh’g en banc, 114 F.3d 1332 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Parker v. Stryker Corp.
See Enlow v. St Jude Medical, Inc., 210 F.Supp.2d 853, 861-62 (W.D.Ky.2001) (citing Martin v. Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc., 105 F.3d 1090, 1100 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 850 , 139 L.Ed.2d 751 (1998)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Michaelis v. Deluxe Financial Services, Inc.
See Martin v. Telectronics Pacing Sys., Inc., 105 F.3d 1090, 1101 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 850 , 139 L.Ed.2d 751 (1998); Spinelli v. Gaughan, 12 F.3d 853, 857-58 (9th Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rebelo
See United States v. Banks, 115 F.3d 916, 919 (11th Cir.1997) (“The statute [Section 2462] is enforced against the government only when the government is acting to vindicate private interests, not a sovereign or public interest.”), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 852 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998); United States v. Telluride Co., 146 F.3d 1241 , 1248-49 (10th Cir.1998) (citing Banks); cf. Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Calvo
See United States v. Banks, 115 F.3d 916, 919 (11th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 852 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
SEC v. Joseph D. Radcliffe
See United States v. Banks, 115 F.3d 916, 919 (11th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 852 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Dana R. Derungs Devin Derungs, a Minor Jennifer Gore Austin Gore, a Minor Angie Baird Kassidee Baird, a Minor v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
See, Fisher v. Vassar College, 70 F.3d 1420, 1448 (2d Cir.1995), on reh'g en banc, 114 F.3d 1332 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998). 9 .
cited
Cited "see"
John Saulsberry v. St. Mary's University of Minnesota, a Minnesota Non-Profit Educational Institution
See Feltmann v. Sieben, 108 F.3d 970, 975 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
John Saulsberry v. St. Mary's Univ.
See Feltman v. Sieben, 108 F.3d 970, 975 (8th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Kwai Wing Wong v. City of New York
See Fisher v. Vassar, 114 F.3d 1332, 1337 (2d Cir.1997) (in banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kessler
See United States v. Earles, 113 F.3d 796, 800 (8th Cir.1997) (holding that grand jury testimony, although inadmissible under other hearsay exceptions, “may ... be considered for admission under the catch-all exception”), cer t. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cavalier Clothes, Inc. v. United States
See Amertex Enterprises Ltd. v. United States, 1995 WL 925961 at * 65 (1995), aff'd, 108 F.3d 1392 (Fed.Cir.1997) (table), cert denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998); Grumman Aerospace Corp., 2001 WL 146691 (A.S.B.C.A.2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Pace v. Paris Maintenance Co.
See id. 0citing Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1335 (2d Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Catherine Papajohn
See United States v. Earles, 113 F.3d 796, 802 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Ofudu v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.
See Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1335-36 (2d Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Catherine Papajohn
See United States v. Earles, 113 F.3d 796, 802 (8th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 (1998). 1 The Honorable Mark W.
cited
Cited "see"
Menes v. CUNY University of New York
See id. (citing Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1335 (2d Cir.1997) (in banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998)).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Ortiz
See Rashad v. Burt, 108 F.3d 677, 679-680 (6th Cir. 1997), cert, denied, 522 U.S. 1075 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald G. Stevens
See United States v. Sabian, 114 F.3d 913, 916 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc) (citing Koon v. United States, 518 U.S. 81, 98-100 , 116 S.Ct. 2035 , 135 L.Ed.2d 392 (1996)), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075, 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Byrnie v. Town of Cromwell Public Schools
See Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332 , 1335 & 1340 n. 7 (2d Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998); Chambers v. TRM Copy Ctrs.
discussed
Cited "see"
Anderson v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
“Any such stated purpose is sufficient to satisfy the defendant’s burden of production; the employer does not have to persuade the court that the stated purpose was the actual reason for its decision.” Austin, 149 F.3d at 153 ; see Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1335-36 (2d Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Singh v. New York State Department of Taxation & Finance
Mary’s Honor Ctr., 509 U.S. at 510-11 , 113 S.Ct. 2742 ); see also Fisher v. Vassar Coll., 114 F.3d 1332, 1336 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Abdallah v. Napolitano
Mary’s Honor Ctr., 509 U.S. at 510-11 , 113 S.Ct. 2742 ); see also Fisher v. Vassar Coll., 114 F.3d 1332, 1336 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
M.O.C.H.A. Society, Inc. v. City of Buffalo
Mary’s Honor Ctr., 509 U.S. at 510-11 , 113 S.Ct. 2742 ); see also Fisher v. Vassar Coll., 114 F.3d 1332, 1336 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bennett v. Health Management Systems, Inc.
Co., 57 F3d 193, 200 [1995]; see also Fisher v Vassar Coll., 114 F3d 1332, 1390-1391 [1997, Winter, J., dissenting], cert denied 522 US 1075 [1998] [noting that Binder did nothing but apply the “universally recognized principle” that consciousness of guilt may be inferred from dishonest behavior concerning facts material to litigation to “false exculpatory statements by employers,” and pointing out the equivalently universal principle that a jury that finds that a witness has lied in a material part of his or her testimony may “disbelieve other material parts of that witness’s test…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paula A. Kipp, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission, Appellant/cross-Appellee
Penney Co., 75 F.3d 343 , 346-47 (8th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 813 , 117 S.Ct. 61 , 136 L.Ed.2d 23 (1996); see also Feltmann v. Sieben, 108 F.3d 970, 977 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998); Cram v. Lamson and Sessions Co., 49 F.3d 466, 474 (8th Cir.1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paula A. Kipp v. MO Highway and
Penney Co., 75 F.3d 343 , 346-47 (8th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 813 (1996); see also Feltmann v. Sieben, 108 F.3d 970, 977 (8th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 (1998); Cram v. Lamson and -4- Sessions Co., 49 F.3d 466, 474 (8th Cir. 1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James M. Laster (99-6244) and Jerry Lear (99-6247)
(2×)
See also, e.g., United States v. Earles, 113 F.3d 796, 800 (8th Cir.1997) (holding that grand jury testimony, although inadmissible under other hearsay exceptions, “may ... be considered for admission under the catch-all exception”), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998); United States v. Marchini, 797 F.2d 759, 764 (9th Cir.1986) (holding that grand jury testimony was admissible under the residual exception), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1085 , 107 S.Ct. 1288 , 94 L.Ed.2d 145 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Walcek v. United States
See also Marks v. United States, 34 Fed.Cl. 387 (1995), aff'd without op., 116 F.3d 1496 (Fed.Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 852 , 139 L.Ed.2d 753 (1998) (taking rejected where land subject to navigational servitude).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hamad v. Nassau County Medical Center
Mary’s Honor Ctr. v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502, 506 , 113 S.Ct. 2742 , 125 L.Ed.2d 407 (1993)); see also Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1335 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
La Marco v. New York State Nurses Ass'n
See, e.g., Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1337 (2d Cir.1997) (noting that a person’s actions such as “back-scratching, log-rolling, horse-trading, institutional politics, envy, nepotism, spite, or personal hostility” may be unbecoming or small-minded, but nondiscriminatory.), cer t. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bombero v. Warner-Lambert Co.
Id. at 511 & 517, 113 S.Ct. 2742 ; see also Fisher v. Vassar College, 114 F.3d 1332, 1339 (2d Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 851 , 139 L.Ed.2d 752 (1998). 1.Prima Facie Case To establish a prima facie case, plaintiff must show that at the time of the challenged action he was: 1) in the protected age group; 2) qualified for the position at issue; 3) not hired for the position; and 4) denied the position in circumstances giving rise to an inference of age discrimination.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Weiland v. Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.
See also Martin v. Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc., 105 F.3d 1090 (6th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 139 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Adel
See also Rashad v. Burt, 108 F.3d 677, 679-80 (6th Cir. 1997) (“[T]he Blockburger test is insufficient where . . . the concern is not multiple charges under separate statutes, but rather successive prosecutions for conduct that may constitute the same act or transaction.”), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1075 , 118 S. Ct. 850 , 139 L.
Martin et vir
v.
Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.
v.
Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.
No. 96-1749.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 20, 1998.
Published
Citer courts: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial… (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.