green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Rex v. Cia. Pervana De Vapores, S. A.
Ct. 1763, 14 L.Ed.2d 698 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
Vencedora Oceanica Navigacion, S.A. v. Compagnie Nationale Algerienne De Navigation (C.N.A.N.)
See Victory Transport, Inc. v. Comisaria General de Abastecimientos y Transportes, 336 F.2d 354 (2d Cir.1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 934 , 85 S.Ct. 1763 , 14 L.Ed.2d 698 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
Vencedora Oceanica Navigacion, S.A. v. Compagnie Nationale Algerienne De Navigation
See Victory Transport, Inc. v. Comisaria General de Abastecimientos y Transportes, 336 F.2d 354 (2d Cir.1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 934 , 85 S.Ct. 1763 , 14 L.Ed.2d 698 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Outbound Maritime Corp. v. P.T. Indonesian Consortium of Construction Industries
See Victory Transport Inc. v. Comisaria General de Abastecimientos y Transportes, 336 F.2d 354 , 359-358 n. 7 (2d Cir.1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 934 , 85 S.Ct. 1763 , 14 L.Ed.2d 698 (1965) (affidavit of Spanish Consul in New York not sufficient to raise defense of sovereign immunity); Civil Aeronautics Bd. v. Alitalia-Linee Aeree Italiane, 328 F.Supp. 759, 761 (E.D.N.Y.1971) (claims of immunity should be presented through United States Department of State).
cited
Cited "see"
Gibbons v. Udaras Na Gaeltachta
See Victory Transport Inc. v. Comisaria General de Abastecimientos y Transportes, 336 F.2d 354, 360 (2d Cir.1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 934 , 85 S.Ct. 1763 , 14 L.Ed.2d 698 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
Rex, Calvin v. Cia. Pervana De Vapores, S. A. Appeal of Calvin Rex and Cia. Pervana De Vapores, S. A., in No. 80-2335. Rex, Calvin v. Cia. Pervana De Vapores, S. A. Appeal of United States of America, Intervenor, in No. 80-2336
See Victory Transport Inc. v. Comisaria General, 336 F.2d 354, 360-62 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 934 , 85 S.Ct. 1763 , 14 L.Ed.2d 698 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
Carey v. National Oil Corp.
See Victory Transport, Inc. v. Comisaria General, 336 F.2d 354, 360 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 934 , 85 S.Ct. 1763 , 14 L.Ed.2d 698 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
National American Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria
See Victory Transport, Inc. v. Comisaria General, 336 F.2d 354 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 934 , 85 S.Ct. 1763 , 14 L.Ed.2d 698 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Mr. And Mrs. Doe, Witnesses Before the Grand Jury. Mr. And Mrs. Doe v. United States
See Republic of Mexico v. Hoffman, 324 U.S. 30, 34-35 , 65 S.Ct. 530, 532-33 , 89 L.Ed. 729 (1945); see also Victory Transport, Inc. v. Comisaria General de Abastecimientos y Transportes, 336 F.2d 354, 358-59 (2d Cir.1964), ce rt. denied, 381 U.S. 934 , 85 S.Ct. 1763 , 14 L.Ed.2d 698 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin
See, e.g., Anderson v. Creighton, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 3034 , 97 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987) (federal law enforcement officers conducting unconstitutional searches have good faith immunity); Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522 , 104 S.Ct. 1970 , 80 L.Ed.2d 565 (1984) (judges have absolute immunity from suits for damages, but no immunity from suits for injunctive relief); Briscoe v. Lahue, 460 U.S. 325 , 103 S.Ct. 1108 , 75 L.Ed.2d 96 (1983) (police officers giving perjured testimony have absolute immunity); Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 , 102 S.Ct. 2727 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982) (presidential aides h…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin
See, e.g., Anderson v. Creighton, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 3034 , 97 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987) (federal law enforcement officers conducting unconstitutional searches have good faith immu nity); Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522 , 104 S.Ct. 1970 , 80 L.Ed.2d 565 (1984) (judges have absolute immunity from suits for damages, but no immunity from suits for injunctive relief); Briscoe v. Lahue, 460 U.S. 325 , 103 S.Ct. 1108 , 75 L.Ed.2d 96 (1983) (police officers giving perjured testimony have absolute immunity); Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 , 102 S.Ct. 2727 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982) (presidential aides h…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Asociacian De Reclamantes v. United Mexican States
Compare Victory Transport, Inc. v. Comisaria General de Abastecimientos y Transportes, 336 F.2d 354 (2d Cir.1964) (sovereign held immune prior to enactment of FSIA in connection with a commercial loan obtained for general governmental purpose), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 934 , 85 S.Ct. 1763 , 14 L.Ed.2d 698 (1965). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Maritime International Nominees Establishment v. The Republic of Guinea, United States of America, Intervenor
See, e.g., Victory Transport Inc. v. Comisaria General de Abastecimientos y Transportes, 336 F.2d 354, 363-64 (2d Cir.1964) (discussing consent to in personam jurisdiction), *1104 cert. denied, 381 U.S. 934 , 85 S.Ct. 1763 , 14 L.Ed.2d 698 (1965); see also Note, Maritime International Nominees Establishment v. Republic of Guinea: Effect on U.S. Jurisdiction of an Agreement by a Foreign Sovereign to Arbitrate Before the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes, 16 Geo.WashJ.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
De Sanchez v. Banco Central De Nicaragua
See also Victory Transport, Inc. v. Comisaria General de Abastecimientos y Transportes, 336 F.2d 354, 360 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 934 , 85 S.Ct. 1763 , 14 L.Ed.2d 698 (1965).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re the Arbitration Between Atlanta Shipping Corp. & Cheswick-Flanders & Co.
See also, e. g., Victory Transport, Inc. v. Comisaria General de Abastecimientos y Transportes, 336 F.2d 354, 356 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 934 , 85 S.Ct. 1763 , 14 L.Ed.2d 698 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miriam J. Wolf v. Curtis Barkes
(2×)
Compare Alleghany Corp. v. Kirby, 333 F.2d 327, 347 (2 Cir. 1964) (dissenting opinion), cert. granted, Holt v. Alleghany Corp., 381 U.S. 933 , 85 S.Ct. 1772 , 14 L.Ed.2d 698 (1965) .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
WARD
v.
NEW YORK
v.
NEW YORK
No. 1158.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 1965.
Published
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.