green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.4 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Vallejo-Salas
Calderon-Pena , 339 F.3d 320, at 327-28 ; but cf. United States v. Claiborne, 132 F.3d 253 , 255 & n. 2 (5th Cir.1998) (per curiam) (questioning whether Taylor and case interpreting 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e) are pertinent to cases involving the Sentencing Guidelines), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1144 , 118 S.Ct. 1855 , 140 L.Ed.2d 1103 (1998).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Kip R. Jones
we will resist the temptation to create a brightline standard for all cases, i.e., five seconds or less is not long enough and more than five seconds is.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cantu
(2×)
See United States v. Jones, 133 F.3d 358, 360 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1144 , 118 S.Ct. 1854 , 140 L.Ed.2d 1102 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Iris Collette Jackson Dwight Dean Jackson
See United States v. Merriweather, 78 F.3d 1070, 1078 (6th Cir.1996) (holding conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance is a specific intent crime). 72 To find a defendant guilty of conspiracy in violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1) and 846, the jury must find, beyond a reasonable doubt, (1) an agreement with another person to violate the law, (2) knowledge of the essential objectives of the conspiracy, (3) knowing and voluntary involvement, and (4) interdependence among the alleged conspirators. 73 United States v. Carter, 130 F.3d 1432, 1439 (10th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1144 (1…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Pacheco
See United States v. Marin-Castaneda, 134 F.3d 551, 555 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1144 , 118 S.Ct. 1855 , 140 L.Ed.2d 1103 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GERALD EDWARD DAVIS, also known as Gerald E. Davis
See United States v. Jones, 133 F.3d 358, 362 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1144 (1998)(this court reviews de novo the denial of a motion for * Pursuant to 5TH CIR.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Miller
See United States v. Spikes, 158 F.3d 913, 925-27 (6th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1086 , 119 S.Ct. 836 , 142 L.Ed.2d 692 (1999) (holding fifteen to thirty seconds sufficient); United States v. Gatewood, 60 F.3d 248, 250 (6th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1001 , 116 S.Ct. 546 , 133 L.Ed.2d 448 (1995) (ten seconds sufficient); see also United States v. Jones, 133 F.3d 358, 362 (5th Cir.1998), cert. denied 523 U.S. 1144 , 118 S.Ct. 1854 , 140 L.Ed.2d 1102 (1998) (fifteen to twenty seconds sufficient); United States v. Knapp, 1 F.3d 1026, 1030-31 (10th Cir.1993) (ten to twelve seconds s…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Emmitt Granville
See, e.g., Mendonsa, 989 F.2d at 370 (finding a delay of three to five seconds inadequate); see also United States v. Jones, 133 F.3d 358, 361 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1144 , 118 S.Ct. 1854 , 140 L.Ed.2d 1102 (1998) (surveying the case law in the federal circuits and noting generally that “a delay of five-seconds or less after knocking and announcing has been held a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3109”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Davis
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 97-8796.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 26, 1998.
Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.