green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see"
Nicole Moisant v. Air Midwest, Inc.
(3×)
See Summit v. S-B Power Tool, 121 F.3d 416 , 421 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1004 , 118 S.Ct. 1185 , 140 L.Ed.2d 316 (1998).
examined
Cited "see"
Michael Troknya v. Cleveland Chiropractic Clinic
(3×)
See Summit v. S-B Power Tool, 121 F.3d 416 , 420 (8th Cir.1997) ("this Court uses the same standard as the district court"), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1004 , 118 S.Ct. 1185 , 140 L.Ed.2d 316 (1998).
examined
Cited "see"
Michael Troknya etc. v. Cleveland Chiro.
(3×)
See Summit v. S-B Power Tool, 121 F.3d 416 , 420 (8th Cir.1997) (“this Court uses the same standard as the district court”), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1004 , 118 S.Ct. 1185 , 140 L.Ed.2d 316 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Harris v. Pameco Corp.
See Doe v. Belleville, 119 F. 3d 563 (CA7 1997)[, cert granted and judgment vacated for further reconsideration in light of Orcale 523 US 1001 , 118 S Ct 1185 , 140 L Ed 2d 313 (1998)].
discussed
Cited "see"
Davidson v. Besser Co.
See Dancy v. Hyster Company, 127 F.3d 649, 653-54 (8th Cir.1997) (expert testimony required under Arkansas law), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1004 , 118 S.Ct. 1186 , 140 L.Ed.2d 316 (1998); Pestel v. Vermeer Mfg.
cited
Cited "see"
Cota B. Allen v. Entergy Corp.
See Dancy v. Hyster Co., 127 F.3d 649, 653 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1186 , 140 L.Ed.2d 316 (1998); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e).
discussed
Cited "see"
prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,525 Juan Jaurequi v. Carter Manufacturing Co., Inc., John Deere Company Deere & Company
See Dancy v. Hyster Co., 127 F.3d 649, 652 (8th Cir.1997) (district court properly looked to Daubert reliability factors for guidance regarding the admissibility of proffered expert testimony in alternative design case), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1186 , 140 L.Ed.2d 316 (1998); Peitzmeier, 97 F.3d at 296-97 (same); Pestel v. Vermeer Mfg.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rebecca Hunt, Susan Nurnberg v. State of Missouri, Department of Corrections
(2×)
See, e.g., Summit v. S-B Power Tool, 121 F.3d 416 , 421 (8th Cir.1997) (affirming JAML for the defendant-employer for insufficiency of the evidence to prove a constructive discharge where the evidence showed that, although the plaintiff-employee had been transferred to a second shift with temporary employees and defective parts, her stress was caused largely by her own performance problems and not by sex discrimination), cer t. denied, 523 U.S. 1004 , 118 S.Ct. 1185 , 140 L.Ed.2d 316 (1998); Hanenburg v. Principal Mut.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. Russell Corp.
(2×)
Moreover, the mere act of disciplining an employee, especially where, as here, the discipline was reasonable, does not create intolerable working conditions sufficient to create a constructive discharge. “ ‘[Dissatisfaction with work assignments, a feeling of being unfairly criticized, or difficult or unpleasant working conditions are not so intolerable as to compel a reasonable person to resign.’ ” Matvia v. Bald Head Island Management, Inc., 259 F.3d 261, 273 (4th Cir.2001) (citations omitted); see also Summit v. S-B Power Tool, 121 F.3d 416 , 421 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee Hosiery
See Sara Lee, 177 F.R.D. at 257; compare, e.g., Dancy v. Hyster Co., 127 F.3d 649 (8th Cir.1997) (finding that Daubert analysis applies to non-scientific evidence), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1186 , 140 L.Ed.2d 316 (1998), with Compton v. Subaru of America, Inc., 82 F.3d 1513 , 1518-19 (10th Cir.) (finding that Daubert analysis applies only to scientific evidence), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 611 , 136 L.Ed.2d 536 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Litton Industrial Automation Systems, Inc.
v.
Nationwide Power Corp.
v.
Nationwide Power Corp.
No. 97-917.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 9, 1998.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.