green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.3 score
“a ection 6672 assessment is presumed correct, and it is the individual's burden to show, in a refund action, that he or she was not a responsible person or did not willfully fail to pay over the taxes.”
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Brinskele v. United States
a ection 6672 assessment is presumed correct, and it is the individual's burden to show, in a refund action, that he or she was not a responsible person or did not willfully fail to pay over the taxes.
cited
Cited "see"
Seaver v. New Buffalo Auto Sales (In re Hecker)
See Riley v. United States, 118 F.3d 1220 , 1222 n. 1 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1020 , 118 S.Ct. 1299 , 140 L.Ed.2d 466 (1998). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Arnold v. Krause, Inc.
See Softel, Inc. v. Dragon Medical and Scientific Communications, Inc., 118 F.3d 955 , 961 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1020 , 118 S.Ct. 1300 , 140 L.Ed.2d 466 (1998) (citing Outley v. City of New York, 837 F.2d 587, 590-91 (2d Cir. 1988)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walker Manufacturing, Inc. v. Hoffmann, Inc.
See Softel, Inc. v. Dragon Medical and Scientific Communications, Inc., 118 F.3d 955, 970 (2d Cir.1997) (citing Lipton v. Nature Co., 71 F.3d 464, 473 (2d Cir.1995), in turn citing Waldman Publ'g, 43 F.3d at 781-85 ), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1020 , 118 S.Ct. 1300 , 140 L.Ed.2d 466 (1998); see also 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (a)(1)(A) *1070 (statutory prohibition on false designation of origin cast in terms that track these elements). 3.
discussed
Cited "see"
Faulkner v. National Geographic Society
Lipton v. Nature Co., 71 F.3d 464, 473 (2d Cir.1995); accord Softel, Inc. v. Dragon Med. & Scientific Communications, Inc., 118 F.3d 955 , 970-71 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1020 , 118 S.Ct. 1300 , 140 L.Ed.2d 466 (1998); EFS Marketing, Inc. v. Russ Berrie & Co., Inc., 76 F.3d 487, 492 (2d Cir.1996); Kregos v. Associated Press, 937 F.2d 700, 711 (2d Cir.1991). 179 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Pavlov v. Bank of New York Co., Inc.
E.g., Hoelzer v. City of Stamford, 722 F.Supp. 1106, 1112 (S.D.N.Y.1989), aff’d, 933 F.2d 1131 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1035 , 113 S.Ct. 815 , 121 L.Ed.2d 687 (1992); see Softel, Inc. v. Dragon Med. & Scientific Communications, Inc., 118 F.3d 955 , 967 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1020 , 118 S.Ct. 1300 , 140 L.Ed.2d 466 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Williams
See Riley v. United States, 118 F.3d 1220 , 1222 n. 1 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1020 , 118 S.Ct. 1299 , 140 L.Ed.2d 466 (1998); Vierkant, 240 B.R. at 323 .
cited
Cited "see"
LaBarge v. Vierkant (In Re Vierkant)
See Riley v. United States, 118 F.3d 1220 , 1222 n. 1 (8th Cir.1997), ce rt. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 1299 , 140 L.Ed.2d 466 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Dale Alan LaBarge v. Kevin Lynn Vierkant
See Riley v. United States, 118 F.3d 1220 , 1222 n.1 (8th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 1299 , 140 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Worldwide Sport Nutritional Supplements, Inc. v. Five Star Brands, LLC
See Softel Inc. v. Dragon Medical and Scientific Communications, Inc., 118 F.3d 955 . 967-68 (2d Cir.1997), ce rt. denied, 523 U.S. 1020 , 118 S.Ct. 1300 , 140 L.Ed.2d 466 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
McKenzie Engineering Company, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner
See Pace Industries, Inc. v. NLRB, 118 F.3d 585 , 590 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1299 , 140 L.Ed.2d 466 (1998) (in mixed-motive case, once NLRB General Counsel establishes prima facie case that protected conduct was motivating factor in employer’s decision, burden of production shifts to employer to show that same action would have taken place in absence of protected conduct).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frink America, Inc. v. Champion Road MacHinery Ltd.
See Softel, Inc. v. Dragon Med. and Scientific Communications, Inc., 118 F.3d 955, 968 (2d Cir.1997) (citing Ashland Management Inc. v. Janien, 82 N.Y.2d 395, 407 , 604 N.Y.S.2d 912 , 624 N.E.2d 1007 (1993)), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 1300 , 140 L.Ed.2d 466 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Simula, Inc. v. Autoliv, Inc.
See FDIC v. Garner, 125 F.3d 1272, 1276 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 1299 , 140 L.Ed.2d 466 (1998). 53 The district court correctly denied Simula's request for a preliminary injunction, since provisional relief is available from the Swiss Arbitral Tribunal.
cited
Cited "see"
Simula, Inc. v. Autoliv, Inc.
See FDIC v. Garner, 125 F.3d 1272, 1276 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 1299 , 140 L.Ed.2d 466 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment Corporation
See FDIC v. Garner, 125 F.3d 1272, 1276 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1299 , 140 L.Ed.2d 466 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stenograph L.L.C. v. Bossard Associates, Inc.
See Softel v. Dragon Med. & Scientific Communications, 118 F.3d 955 , 969 (2d Cir.1997) (upholding district court’s refusal to award damages on trade secret claim because such damages would have been “coextensive with the damages it had already awarded for copyright infringement”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1300 , 140 L.Ed.2d 466 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hennrick, M.D. v. MIR Scientific, LLC
See Encyclopedia Brown Prods., Ltd. v. Home Box Office, 26 F. Supp. 2d 606, 612 (S.D.N.Y.1998) (sealing portions of record, noting that “[p]otential damage from release of trade secrets is a legitimate basis for sealing documents and restricting public access during trial”) (citations omitted); In re New York Times Co. to Unseal Wiretap & Search Warrant Materials, 577 F.3d 401 , 410 n.4 (2d Cir. 2009) (“When litigation requires disclosure of trade secrets, the court may disclose certain materials only to the attorneys involved.”); see also Banco Santander (Brasil), S.A. v. American Air…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
EarthWeb, Inc. v. Schlack
Trade Secrets Under New York law, a trade secret is defined as “any formula, pattern, device or compilation of information which is used in one’s business, and which gives [the owner] an opportunity to obtain an advantage over competitors who do not know or use it.” Haber, 188 F.3d at 44 (quoting Restatement of Torts, § 757 cmt. b (1939)); see also Softel, Inc. v. Dragon Medical and Scientific Communications, Inc., 118 F.3d 955, 968 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1020 , 118 S.Ct. 1300 , 140 L.Ed.2d 466 (1998); Ashland Management Inc. v. Janien, 82 N.Y.2d 395, 407 , 604 N.Y.S.2d 9…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Montgomery v. Noga
The court of appeals reversed, “find[ing] that, as a matter of law, a false copyright notice alone cannot constitute a false designation of origin within the meaning of § 43(a) of the Lanham Act.” Lipton, 71 F.3d at 473 ; see also Softel, Inc. v. Dragon Med. & Scientific Communications, Inc., 118 F.3d 955 , 971 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1300 , 140 L.Ed.2d 466 (1998) (noting that “[without a requirement of ‘some additional misrepresentation of originality beyond mere use of a copyright symbol, [plaintiffs] could convert all improper copyright claims into Lanham…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Hyundai Motor Co. v. Alvarado
(4×)
See, e.g., Doyle v. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengelellschaft, 114 F.3d 1134 (11th Cir.1997) (lap belt), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1300 , 140 L.Ed.2d 466 (1998); Munroe v. Galati, 189 Ariz. 113 , 938 P.2d 1114 (1997) (airbag); Hernandez-Gomez v. Leonardo, 185 Ariz. 509 , 917 P.2d 238 (1996) (lap belt); Ketchum v. Hyundai Motor Co., 49 Cal.App.4th 1672 , 57 Cal.Rptr.2d 595 (1996) (lap belt); Hyundai Motor Co. v. Phillip, 639 So.2d 1064 (FIa.Dist.Ct.App.1994); Wilson v. Pleasant, 660 N.E.2d 327 (Ind.1995) (airbag); Loulos v. Dick Smith Ford, Inc., 882 S.W.2d 149 (Mo.Ct.App.1994) (airbag); Tebbet…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fritter v. Dafina, Inc.
Outley v. City of New York, 837 F.2d 587, 590 (2d Cir. 1988); see also Softel v. Dragon Med. & Scientific Communications, Inc., 118 F.3d 955 , 961 (2d Cir.1997) (consider explanation, importance, prejudice, possibility of continuance), ce rt. denied, — U.S.—, 118 S.Ct. 1300 , 140 L.Ed.2d 466 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pace Industries, Inc., dba Precision Industries, Inc.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 97-952.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 23, 1998.
Published
Citer courts: Federal Claims (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.