green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Green v. State
See Escobar v. State, 699 So.2d 988, 993-94 (Fla.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1072 , 118 S.Ct. 1512 , 140 L.Ed.2d 666 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Von Graffenreid v. Craig
See Haynsworth v. The Corporation, 121 F.3d 956, 962 (5th Cir.), reh’g denied, 129 F.3d 614 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1072 , 118 S.Ct. 1513 , 140 L.Ed.2d 666 (1998), citing International Software Systems, Inc. v. Amplicon, Inc., 77 F.3d 112, 114-15 (5th Cir.1996) (federal law provides rule of decision on issues related to enforceability of forum selection clause). 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
Campbell v. BankBoston, N.A.
See Turner v. Fallon Community Health Plan, Inc., 953 F.Supp. 419, 424 (D.Mass.), aff'd, 127 F.3d 196 (1st Cir.1997), cert. *80 denied, 523 U.S. 1072 , 118 S.Ct. 1512 , 140 L.Ed.2d 666 (1998) (claim of breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing preempted by ERISA).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tri-State Hospital Supply Corp. v. United States
See Anderson v. United States, 127 F.3d 1190, 1191-92 (9th Cir.1997) (“Congress has not waived the government’s sovereign immunity for attorneys’ fees and expenses under the FTCA.”), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1072 , 118 S.Ct. 1512 , 140 L.Ed.2d 666 (1998); Joe v. United States, 772 F.2d 1535, 1537 (11th Cir.1985) (per curiam ) (“The FTCA does not contain the express waiver of sovereign immunity necessary to permit a court to award attorneys’ fees against the United States directly under that act.”).
cited
Cited "see"
Geissal v. Moore Medical Corp.
See Turner v. Fallon Community Health Plan, 127 F.3d 196, 198 (1st Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1072 , 118 S.Ct. 1512 , 140 L.Ed.2d 666 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Walker v. State
See Escobar v. State, 699 So.2d 988, 993-994 (Fla.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1072 , 118 S.Ct. 1512 , 140 L.Ed.2d 666 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Grasle v. State
See Escobar v. State, 699 So.2d 988, 993-94 (Fla.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1072 , 118 S.Ct. 1512 , 140 L.Ed.2d 666 , 66 U.S.L.W. 3686 (U.S.Fla.
cited
Cited "see"
Hawk v. State
See Escobar v. State, 699 So.2d 988 (Fla.1997), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 118 S.Ct. 1512 , 140 L.Ed.2d 666 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tri-State Hospital Supply Corp. v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., Anderson v. United States, 127 F.3d 1190, 1191-92 (9th Cir.1997) ("Congress has not waived the government's sovereign immunity for attorney['s] fees and expenses under the FTCA."), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1072 , 118 S.Ct. 1512 , 140 L.Ed.2d 666 (1998); Joe v. United States, 772 F.2d 1535, 1537 (11th Cir.1985) ("The FTCA does not contain the express waiver of sovereign immunity necessary to permit a court to award attorney['s] fees against the United States directly under that act.").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Exxon Research and Engineering Co. v. Industrial Risk Insurers
See, e.g., Haynsworth v. The Corporation, 121 F. 3d 956, 963 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1072 , 118 S.Ct. 1513 , 140 L.Ed. 2d 666 (1998) (dismissing Texas action in deference to British action); Argueta v. Banco Mexicano, S.A., 87 F. 3d 320, 325-27 (9th Cir.1996) (dismissing Arizona action in deference to Mexican action despite the plaintiff's fear of returning to Mexico for trial); Ensign-Bickford Co. v. ICI Explosives USA, Inc., 817 F.Supp. 1018, 1032-33 (D.Conn.1993) (dismissing Connecticut action in deference to Canada action filed on the same day); Ronar, Inc. v. Wallace, 649 F…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Trombley v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Grace & Co., Inc., 202 F.3d 44, 51 (holding that a state law contract claim is preempted under ERISA when the claim relates to a benefit plan and when it is merely an alternative mechanism for obtaining ERISA plan benefits); see also Turner v. Fallon Community Health Plan, 127 F.3d 196, 199 (1st Cir.1997), ce rt. denied, 523 U.S. 1072 , 118 S.Ct. 1512 , 140 L.Ed.2d 666 (1998) (holding that, despite the Supreme Court’s recent restriction of ERISA preemption, common law claims for breach of contract remain preempted under ERISA when such claims fall within it’s exclusive civil enforcement re…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pryzbowski v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc.
See Andrews-Clarke, 984 F.Supp. at 58 (“Unlike the hospital surcharge statute at issue in Travelers , which had only an indirect economic influence on plan administration, here [plaintiffs] claims [for improper refusal of treatment leading to insured’s death] go right to the heart of the benefit determination process.”) (citation omitted); see also Turner v. Fallon Community Health Plan, Inc., 127 F.3d 196, 199 (1st Cir.1997) (“It would be difficult to think of a state law that ‘relates’ more closely to an employee benefit plan than one that affords remedies for the breach of oblig…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Overseas Partners, Inc. v. Progen Musavirlik Ve Yonetim Hizmetleri, Ltd. Sikerti
See, e.g., Haynsworth v. The Corporation, 121 F.3d 956, 962 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1513 , 140 L.Ed.2d 666 (1998); Rivendell Forest Prods., Ltd. v. Canadian Pacific Ltd., 2 F.3d 990, 991-92 (10th Cir.1993) (citing cases); Royal Bed and Spring Co. v. Famossul Industria e Comercio de Moveis Ltda., 906 F.2d 45, 50 (1st Cir.1990); see also Commerce Consultants Int'l, Inc. v. Vetrerie Riunite S.p.A., 867 F.2d 697, 699-700 (D.C.Cir.1989) (applying Bremen in a diversity case).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jones
v.
Securities and Exchange Commission
v.
Securities and Exchange Commission
No. 97-1165.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1998.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.