Bilzerian v. HSSM 7 Ltd. P'ship, 118 S. Ct. 1559 (1998). · Go Syfert
Bilzerian v. HSSM 7 Ltd. P'ship, 118 S. Ct. 1559 (1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
115 citation events (65 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Parham v. Harris-Onaxis (In re Harris-Onaxis) (ganb, 2011-12-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Parham v. Harris-Onaxis (In re Harris-Onaxis) (2×)
Bankr. N.D. Ga. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See S.E.C. v. Bilzerian (In re Bilzerian), 153 F.3d 1278 , 1281 n. 10 (11th Cir.1998), citing HSSM # 7 Limited Partnership v. Bilzerian (In re Bilzerian), 100 F.3d 886, 892 (11th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1093 , 118 S.Ct. 1559 , 140 L.Ed.2d 791 (1998), citing Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. at 284 n. 11, 111 S.Ct. at 658 n. 11, 112 L.Ed.2d 755 .
discussed Cited "see" Willis v. Pacific Maritime Ass'n (2×)
9th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smith v. Nat’l Steel & Shipbuilding Co., 125 F.3d 751 , 757 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1094 , 118 S.Ct. 1559 , 140 L.Ed.2d 791 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" Willis v. Pacific Maritime Association (2×)
9th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smith v. Nat’l Steel & Shipbuilding Co., 125 F.3d 751 , 757 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1094 , 118 S.Ct. 1559 , 140 L.Ed.2d 791 (1998).
examined Cited "see" St. Charles Foods, Inc. v. America's Favorite Chicken Co. (3×)
11th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Motorcity of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank N.A., 83 F.3d 1317, 1323 (11th Cir.1996), vacated on other grounds by Hess v. F.D.I.C., 519 U.S. 1087 , 117 S.Ct. 760 , 136 L.Ed.2d 708 (1997), reinstated by Motorcity of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank N.A., 120 F.3d 1140 (11th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1093 , 118 S.Ct. 1559 , 140 L.Ed.2d 791 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" David Willis v. Pacific Maritime Association International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, Local 10. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union, Paul Gomez v. Pacific Maritime Association International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, Local 10. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, Local 34 (2×)
9th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smith v. National Steel and Shipbuilding, 125 F.3d 751, 757 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 1559 , 140 L.Ed.2d 791 (1998). 50 AFFIRMED. 1 At oral argument, counsel for Appellees explained that the union's name has been changed from International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union to International Longshore and Warehouse Union 2 In addition, the Sixth Circuit has held, in an unpublished disposition, that an employer is not required to violate the seniority rights of other workers to accommodate a single employee.
discussed Cited "see" Willis v. Pacific Maritime Ass'n (2×)
9th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smith v. National Steel and Shipbuilding, 125 F.3d 751 , 757 (9th Cir.1997), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1559 , 140 L.Ed.2d 791 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Murphy v. Federal Deposit Insurance (2×)
11th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Motorcity of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank N.A., (“Motorcity I”), 83 F.3d 1317, 1326 (11th Cir.1996) (en banc), vacated and remanded by Hess v. FDIC, 519 U.S. 1087 , 117 S.Ct. 760 , 136 L.Ed.2d 708 (1997), reinstated by Motorcity of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank N.A., (“Motorcity II”), 120 F.3d 1140 (11th Cir.1997), (en banc), cert. denied, Hess v. FDIC, 523 U.S. 1093 , 118 S.Ct. 1559 , 140 L.Ed.2d 791 (1998). 3 We have held that the doctrine “‘applies in virtually all cases where a federal depository institution regulatory agency is confronted with an agreem…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Paul A. BILZERIAN
v.
HSSM 7 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
No. 97-928.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 27, 1998.
118 S. Ct. 1559
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.