Bolling v. Russell Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 525 U.S. 893 (1998).

Bolling v. Russell Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 525 U.S. 893 (1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment 5.8 score

17 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: United States v. White (ca5, 2000-07-17)

Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗

examined Cited "see" United States v. White (3×)

5th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Dukes, 139 F.3d 469, 473 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 894 , 119 S.Ct. 215 , 142 L.Ed.2d 177 (1998). “[P]oor quality and partial unintelligibility do not render tapes inadmissible unless the unintelligible portions are so substantial as to render the recording as a whole untrustworthy.” Id. (citing United States v. Stone, 960 F.2d 426, 436 (5th Cir.1992)).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Charles W. Ramsey (2×)

D.C. Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Davis, 127 F.3d 68, 71 (D.C.Cir.1997) (“The elicitation by the defense of the very testimony now challenged ... for its own affirmative purposes, is an independent reason for finding no error_”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 215 , 142 L.Ed.2d 177 (1998); United States v. Baumgarten, 517 F.2d 1020, 1029 (8th Cir.1975) (finding no prejudice from redirect regarding defendant’s prior arrests after defense counsel, on cross-examination of government witness, raised issue), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 878 , 96 S.Ct. 152 , 46 L.Ed.2d 111 (1975).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Mitchell (2×)

5th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Dukes, 139 F.3d 469, 476 (5th Cir.) (reviewing challenge to jury instruction for plain error when defendant did not request a specific instruction), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 215 , 142 L.Ed.2d 177 (1998). 16 .