green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.7 score
“we review the denial of a motion for new trial ... under an abuse of discretion standard.”
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Samadi v. Gonzales
See Halicki v. Louisiana Casino Cruises, Inc., 151 F.3d 465, 468 (5th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1005 , 119 S.Ct. 1143 , 143 L.Ed.2d 210 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arippa v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
See Indianapolis Power & Light v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 711 A.2d 1071 (Pa.Cmwlth.), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 556 Pa. 698 , 727 A.2d 1124 (1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1005 , 119 S.Ct. 1143 , 143 L.Ed.2d 210 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Williams v. GTE Communication
See Halicki v. Louisiana Casino Cruises, Inc., 151 F.3d 465, 470 (5th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1005 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lary v. Dallas Area Rapid
See Halicki v. Louisiana Casino Cruises, Inc., 151 F.3d 465, 467-68 (5th Cir. Eighteen days after entry of summary 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1005 (1999). judgment, appellant moved to reconsider; the Consequently, the motion to reconsider was eighteen days exceeded the time allowed under untimely and did not toll the thirty-day deadline for filing notice of appeal.
discussed
Cited "see"
Madison v. IBP, Inc.
See Gumbhir v. Curators of Univ. of Missouri, 157 F.3d 1141 , 1145 (8th Cir.1998) (Title VII case), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1005 , 119 S.Ct. 1143 , 143 L.Ed.2d 210 (1999); Kim v. Nash Finch Co., 123 F.3d 1046, 1063, 1064-65 (8th Cir.1997) (Title VII and § 1981 case); Davis v. City of Waterloo, 551 N.W.2d 876, 884 (Iowa 1996) (ICRA case).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Penton
See Williams, ___ U.S. at ___, 128 S.Ct. at 1842 ; see also Byers v. Edmondson, 97-0831, p. 13 (La.App. 1st Cir.5/15/98), 712 So.2d 681, 689 , writ denied, 98-1596 (La. 10/9/98), 726 So.2d 29 , cert. denied sub nom, Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P. v. Byers, 526 U.S. 1005 , 119 S.Ct. 1143 , 143 L.Ed.2d 210 (1999) (recognizing that solicitation of crime may be prevented or punished by the State consistent with the principles of the First Amendment).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sprint Communications Co. v. Ucon Telecommunications Network, Inc.
Partnership, the Supreme Court determined a lawyer’s failure to meet a bankruptcy court deadline was excusable neglect because the deadline notice provided by the bankruptcy court was inadequate. 507 U.S. 380, 395-97 , 113 S.Ct. 1489 , 123 L.Ed.2d 74 (1993); see also Halicki v. Louisiana Casino Cruises, Inc., 151 F.3d 465, 469 (5th Cir.1998) (adopting the Pioneer standard for Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5)), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1005 , 119 S.Ct. 1143 , 143 L.Ed.2d 210 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Saudi v. S/T MARINE ATLANTIC
See, e.g., Halicki v. Louisiana Casino Cruises, Inc., 151 F.3d 465, 470 (5th Cir.1998), ce rt. denied, 526 U.S. 1005 , 119 S.Ct. 1143 , 143 L.Ed.2d 210 (1999); Goodman v. Lee, 988 F.2d 619 , 623 n. 2 (5th Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. Johnson
Determination whether a party’s neglect is excusable “is at bottom an equitable one, taking account of all relevant circumstances surrounding the party’s omission.”29 27 See also 28 U.S.C. § 2107 (c). 28 507 U.S. 380, 395 (1993); see also Halicki v. Louisiana Casino Cruises, Inc., 151 F.3d 465, 468-69 (5th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1005 (1999). 29 Pioneer, 507 U.S. at 395 . 11 In making the determination, the court must consider (1) the danger of prejudice to the nonmovant; (2) the length of the delay and its potential impact on judicial proceedings; (3) the reason for the de…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
American Academy of Pain Management
v.
Joseph, Executive Director, Medical Board of California
v.
Joseph, Executive Director, Medical Board of California
No. 98-1064.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 8, 1999.
526 U.S. 1005
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.