green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.0 score
“as the trier of fact, was in the best position to evaluate all the evidence, contradictory at times”
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In re Adoption Garret
as the trier of fact, was in the best position to evaluate all the evidence, contradictory at times
cited
Cited "see"
Ball v. SFX Broadcasting, Inc.
See Halligan v. Piper Jaffray, Inc., 148 F.3d 197, 204 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1034 , 119 S.Ct. 1286 , 143 L.Ed.2d 378 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brookdale Hospital Medical Center v. Local 1199, National Health & Human Service Employees Union
See Halligan v. Piper Jaffray, Inc., 148 F.3d 197 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1034 , 119 S.Ct. 1286 , 143 L.Ed.2d 378 (1999); Stroehmann Bakeries, Inc. v. Local 776, Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters, 969 F.2d 1436 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1022 , 113 S.Ct. 660 , 121 L.Ed.2d 585 (1992); Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Int’l Union, Allied Indus.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Westerbeke Corp. v. Daihatsu Motor Co., Ltd.
Id. (citations omitted); see also Halligan v. Piper Jaffray, Inc., 148 F.3d 197, 202 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1034 , 119 S.Ct. 1286 , 143 L.Ed.2d 378 (1999); Greenberg v. Bear Stearns & Co., Inc., No. 99 Civ. 358(JSM), 1999 WL 642859 , at *1 (S.D.N.Y.1999), aff'd, 220 F.3d 22 (2d Cir.2000), ce rt. denied, 531 U.S. 1075 , 121 S.Ct. 770 , 148 L.Ed.2d 669 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rutanen v. Baylis (In Re Baylis)
See, e.g., In re Adoption of Hugo, 428 Mass. 219 , 700 N.E.2d 516, 520-21 (1998) (noting that the SJC reviews the findings of the probate court for clear errors of law), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1034 , 119 S.Ct. 1286 , 143 L.Ed.2d 378 (1999); White v. White, 322 Mass. 30 , 76 N.E.2d 15, 16-17 (1947) (“All questions of law, fact and discretion are open for our decision, and we can find facts contrary to the [probate] judge’s findings if convinced that he is plainly wrong.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Susan Beachy v. Boise Cascade Corporation
See Sablan v. Department of Fin. of C.N.M.I., 856 F.2d 1317 , 1323 (9th Cir.1988); see also Scott v. Ross, 140 F.3d 1275, 1285 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 1285 , 143 L.Ed.2d 378 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grace v. Thomason Nissan
Corp., 40 F.3d 1119 , 1126-27 (10th Cir.1994); see also Scott v. Ross, 140 F.3d 1275, 1284 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 119 S.Ct. 1285 , 143 L.Ed.2d 378 (1999) (vicarious liability properly imposed upon cult awareness organization under § 1985(3)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cult Awareness Network
v.
Scott
v.
Scott
No. 98-878.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 1999.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Massachusetts Appeals Court (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of American Family Foundation et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.