green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.8 score
“he exception in 14501(c)(2)(a) limits the authority of a state to delegate its regulatory authority over tow truck operators to local or municipal governments.”
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Martin v. Stites
he exception in 14501(c)(2)(a) limits the authority of a state to delegate its regulatory authority over tow truck operators to local or municipal governments.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
See E.E.O.C. v. PVNF, L.L.C., 487 F.3d 790, 799 (10th Cir.2007) (“the very term ‘environment’ indicates that allegedly discriminatory incidents should not be examined in isolation”) (quoting Penry v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka, 155 F.3d 1257, 1262 (10th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1039 , 119 S.Ct. 1334 , 143 L.Ed.2d 498 (1999)); Mason v. Southern Illinois Univ. at Carbondale, 233 F.3d 1036, 1045 (7th Cir.2000) (“Courts should not carve up the incidents of harassment and then separately analyze each incident, by itself, to see if each rises to the level of being severe or …
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. NEW YORK STATE DEPT. OF CORREC. SERVICES
See E.E.O.C. v. PVNF, L.L.C., 487 F.3d 790, 799 (10th Cir.2007) ("the very term `environment' indicates that allegedly discriminatory incidents should not be examined in isolation") (quoting Penry v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka, 155 F.3d 1257, 1262 (10th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1039 , 119 S.Ct. 1334 , 143 L.Ed.2d 498 (1999)); Mason v. Southern Illinois Univ. at Carbondale, 233 F.3d 1036, 1045 (7th Cir.2000) ("Courts should not carve up the incidents of harassment and then separately analyze each incident, by itself, to see if each rises to the level of being severe or pervasive"…
discussed
Cited "see"
Price v. Jefferson County
See Rheuark v. Shaw, 628 F.2d 297, 305 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 931 , 101 S.Ct. 1392 , 67 L.Ed.2d 365 (1981) (holding that "[i]n order for a governmental unit to be liable under § 1983, the policy or custom must . . ., by the very terms of the statute, be a proximate cause of the constitutional violation"); accord Huffman v. County of Los Angeles, 147 F.3d 1054, 1059 (9th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1038 , 119 S.Ct. 1333 , 143 L.Ed.2d 498 (1999); Trevino v. *693 Gates, 99 F.3d 911, 918 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1117 , 117 S.Ct. 1249 , 137 L.Ed.2d 330 (1997); …
discussed
Cited "see"
Price v. Jefferson County
See Rheuark v. Shaw, 628 F.2d 297, 305 (5th Cir.1980), cert, denied, 450 U.S. 931 , 101 S.Ct. 1392 , 67 L.Ed.2d 365 (1981) (holding that “[i]n order for a governmental unit to be liable under § 1983, the policy or custom must ..., by the very terms of the statute, be a proximate cause of the constitutional violation”); accord Fiuffman v. County of Los Angeles, 147 F.3d 1054, 1059 (9th Cir. 1998), cert, denied, 526 U.S. 1038 , 119 S.Ct. 1333 , 143 L.Ed.2d 498 (1999); Trevino v. Gates, 99 F.3d 911 , 918 (9th Cir.1996), cert, denied, 520 U.S. 1117 , 117 S.Ct. 1249 , 137 L.Ed.2d 330 (1997); K…
discussed
Cited "see"
Bearint Ex Rel. Bearint v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.
See Klonoski v. Mahlah, 156 F.3d 255, 270, 274-76 (1st Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1039 , 119 S.Ct. 1334 , 143 L.Ed.2d 498 (1999) (describing the difference between impeachment and substantive testimony and reiterating that only evidence used solely for impeachment is exempt from the Federal Rules’ disclosure requirement).
discussed
Cited "see"
Paz v. Weir
See Huffman v. County of Los Angeles, 147 F.3d 1054, 1059 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1038 , 119 S.Ct. 1333 , 143 L.Ed.2d 498 (1999); Trevino v. Gates, 99 F.3d 911, 918 (9th Cir.1996), ce rt. denied, 520 U.S. 1117 , 117 S.Ct. 1249 , 137 L.Ed.2d 330 (1997); Kneipp v. Tedder, 95 F.3d 1199, 1213 (3d Cir.1996); Horn by Parks v. Madison County Fiscal Ct., 22 F.3d 653, 659 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 873 , 115 S.Ct. 199 , 130 L.Ed.2d 130 (1994); Bielevicz v. Dubinon, 915 F.2d 845, 850 (3d Cir.1990); Doe v. District of Columbia, 701 F.2d 948, 953 (D.C.Cir.1983); Rheuark v. Shaw, 628…
discussed
Cited "see"
Casanova v. City of Brookshire
See Huffman v. County of Los Angeles, 147 F.3d 1054, 1059 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1038 , 119 S.Ct. 1333 , 143 L.Ed.2d 498 (1999); Trevino v. Gates, 99 F.3d 911, 918 (9th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1117 , 117 S.Ct. 1249 , 137 L.Ed.2d 330 (1997); Kneipp v. Tedder, 95 F.3d 1199, 1213 (3d Cir.1996); Horn by Parks v. Madison County Fiscal Ct., 22 F.3d 653, 659 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 873 , 115 S.Ct. 199 , 130 L.Ed.2d 130 (1994); Bielevicz v. Dubinon, 915 F.2d 845, 850 (3d Cir.1990); Doe v. District of Columbia, 701 F.2d 948, 953 (D.C.Cir.1983); Rheuark v. Shaw, 628…
discussed
Cited "see"
Casanova v. City of Brookshire
See Huffman v. County of Los Angeles, 147 F.3d 1054, 1059 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1038 , 119 S.Ct. 1333 , 143 L.Ed.2d 498 (1999); Trevino v. Gates, 99 F.3d 911, 918 (9th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1117 , 117 S.Ct. 1249 , 137 L.Ed.2d 330 (1997); Kneipp v. Tedder, 95 F.3d 1199, 1213 (3d Cir.1996); Horn by Parks v. Madison County Fiscal Ct., 22 F.3d 653 , 659 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 873 , 115 S.Ct. 199 , 130 L.Ed.2d 130 (1994); Bielevicz v. Dubinon, 915 F.2d 845, 850 (3d Cir.1990); Doe v. District of Columbia, 701 F.2d 948, 953 (D.C.Cir.1983); Rheuark v. Shaw, 62…
cited
Cited "see"
Todd v. Bear Valley Village Apartments
See Klonoski v. Mahlab, 156 F.3d 255, 269 (1st Cir.1998), cert. denied sub nom., Mary Hitchcock Mem’l Hosp. v. Klonoski, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 1334 , 143 L.Ed.2d 498 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
G.C. Ex Rel. Counts v. North Clackamas School District
The second exception is the “danger creation exception,” under which “state actors may be held liable where they affirmatively place an individual in danger by acting with deliberate indifference to a known or obvious danger in subjecting plaintiff to it.” Kennedy v. City of Ridgefield, 439 F.3d 1055, 1062 (9th Cir.2006) (“Ridgefield”), denying pet. for rehr’g en banc, 440 F.3d 1091 (2006) (Internal citations quotations and brackets omitted); see also Huffman v. County of Los Angeles, 147 F.3d 1054, 1059 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1038 , 119 S.Ct. 1333 , 143 L.Ed.2d 4…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Costa v. AFGO Mechanical Services, Inc.
While the taped conversations can possibly be used for impeachment purposes, they are also clearly “substantive evidence” in that they may be used “to establish the truth of a matter to be determined by the trier of fact.” Chiasson v. Zapata Gulf Marine Corp., 988 F.2d 513, 517 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1029 , 114 S.Ct. 1536 , 128 L.Ed.2d 189 (1994); see also Klonoski v. Mahlab, 156 F.3d 255, 270 (1st Cir.1998) (adopting standard set forth in Chiasson v. Zapata Gulf Marine Corp.), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1039 , 119 S.Ct. 1334 , 143 L.Ed.2d 498 (1999); Lomascolo v. Otto Olds…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cache Valley Electric Co.
v.
Utah Department of Transportation
v.
Utah Department of Transportation
No. 98-579.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 29, 1999.
Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (1)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.