green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.1 score
“a federal court exercising supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims is bound to apply the law of the forum state to the same extent as if it were exercising diversity jurisdiction.”
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jennings v. County of Washtenaw
a federal court exercising supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims is bound to apply the law of the forum state to the same extent as if it were exercising diversity jurisdiction.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lineberry
P. 7(c)(3); see United States v. Threadgill, 172 F.3d 357, 373 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 871 , 120 S.Ct. 172 , 145 L.Ed.2d 146 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dadi
See United States v. Threadgill, 172 F.3d 357, 377-78 (5th Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, 528 U.S. 871 , 120 S.Ct. 172 , 145 L.Ed.2d 146 (1999); Smith, 186 F.3d at 299 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hugh Von Meshack Lawayne Thomas Linda Parker Terrence Ian Hodges, Also Known as Guda
See United States v. Threadgill, 172 F.3d 357, 366 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 172 , 145 L.Ed.2d 146 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Colorado, Inc. , Amicus Curiae
(2×)
See Cheminor Drugs, Ltd. v. Ethyl, Corp., 168 F.3d 119, 128 (3d Cir.) (malicious prosecution, tortious interference with contract, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, and unfair competition), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 173 , 145 L.Ed.2d 146 (1999); State of South Dakota v. Kansas City S. Indus., Inc., 880 F.2d 40 , 50 & n. 24, 53-55 (8th Cir.1989) (tortious interference with contract); Video Int’l Prod., Inc. v. Warner-Amex Cable Communications, 858 F.2d 1075,1084 (5th Cir.1988) (tortious interference with contractual relations); Havoco of Am., Ltd. v. Hollobo…
discussed
Cited "see"
Scott v. Hern
See Cheminor Drugs, Ltd. v. Ethyl, Corp., 168 F.3d 119 , 128 (3d Cir.) (malicious prosecution, tortious interference with contract, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, and unfair competition), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 173 (1999); South Dakota v. Kansas City S. Indus., Inc., 880 F.2d 40 , 50 & n.24, 53-55 (8th Cir. 1989) (tortious interference with contract); Video Int’l Prod., Inc. v. Warner-Amex Cable Communications , 858 F.2d 1075, 1084 (5th Cir. 1988) (tortious interference with contractual relations); Havoco of Am., Ltd. v. Hollobow , 702 F.2d 643 , 649-50 (7th Cir…
discussed
Cited "see"
Foley v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 98 Pension Fund
(2×)
See Bennett v. Conrail Matched Savings Plan Administrative Committee, 168 F.3d 671, 679 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 173 , 145 L.Ed.2d 146 (1999) (citing Hughes Aircraft Co. v. Jacobson, 525 U.S. 432, 437-38 , 119 S.Ct. 755, 760 , 142 L.Ed.2d 881 (1999)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bath Petroleum Storage, Inc. v. Market Hub Partners, L.P.
(2×)
See, Cheminor Drugs, Ltd. v. Ethyl Corp., 168 F.3d 119, 124 (3rd Cir.1999), cert denied 528 U.S. 871 , 120 S.Ct. 173 , 145 L.Ed.2d 146 (1999).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Capitol House Preservation Co. v. Perryman Consultants, Inc.
(4×)
See Woods Exploration, 438 F.2d at 1295 ; see also Kottle, 146 F.3d at 1063 (if misrepresentations made by defendant were of such a magnitude that the “entire [administrative] proceeding was deprived of its legitimacy,” then the sham exception to Noerr-Pennington would apply), and Cheminor Drugs, Ltd. v. Ethyl Corp., 168 F.3d 119, 123 (3rd Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, 528 U.S. 871 , 120 S.Ct. 173 , 145 L.Ed.2d 146 (1999) (material misrepresentations that “infect the core” of the defendant’s claim and the government’s resulting actions are not entitled to Noerr-Pennington immunity).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bennett
v.
Conrail Matched Savings Plan Administrative Committee
v.
Conrail Matched Savings Plan Administrative Committee
No. 99-70.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1999.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Michigan (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.