Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. Liberty Mut. Ins., 528 U.S. 873 (1999). · Go Syfert
Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. Liberty Mut. Ins., 528 U.S. 873 (1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events (25 in the last 25 years) across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: McKowan Lowe & Co., Ltd. v. Jasmine Ltd. (njd, 2000-06-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) McKowan Lowe & Co., Ltd. v. Jasmine Ltd.
D.N.J. · 2000 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the conflict rules do not appear to be drafted with class action procedures in mind and may be at odds with the policies underlying class action rules
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Dubin v. County of Nassau
E.D.N.Y · 2017 · confidence medium
S.Ct. 178, 145 L.Ed.2d 150 (1999); Sanders v. Szubin, 828 F.Supp.2d 542 , 553 n.8 (E.D.N.Y, 2011) (observing, that defendants conceded that administrative sanctions imposed by 'Office of Foreign Assets Control were “at least in part, punitive and thus [ ] properly considered within the ambit of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of ‘excessive’ fines”); Prince v. City of New York, 108 A.D.3d 114 , 966 N.Y.S.2d 16, 20 (App. Div. 1st Dep’t 2013) (in a case challenging a mandatory sanitation fine, “rejecting] the City’s contention that the Excessive Fines Clause does not apply to t…
discussed Cited "see" Erie County Retirees Ass'n v. County of Erie, Pa.
W.D. Pa. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lazy Oil Co. v. Witco Corp., 95 F.Supp.2d 290, 340 (W.D.Pa.1997), aff'd, 166 F.3d 581 (3d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 874 , *378 120 S.Ct. 178 , 145 L.Ed.2d 150 (1999) (citing cases); see also GM Trucks, 55 F.3d at 821 (“The rationale behind the percentage of recovery method also applies in situations where, although the parties claim that the fee and settlement are independent, they actually come from the same source.”). 4 “[W]hen a settlement fund is created in exchange for release of the defendant’s liability both for damages and for statutory attorneys’ fees, equitable …
cited Cited "see" United States v. John G. Juncal, Ramasamy Egambaram, Harvey L. Schilowitz, Danny Kemp, Raymond H. Lancaster
2d Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Goodman, 165 F.3d 169, 173 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 874 , 120 S.Ct. 318 , 145 L.Ed.2d 150 (1999).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Alonzo T. Gregory
2d Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Goodman, 165 F.3d 169, 173 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 874 , 120 S.Ct. 318 , 145 L.Ed.2d 150 (1999) (citing United States v. Williams, 23 F.3d 629, 635 (2d Cir.1994)); United States v. Rexach, 896 F.2d 710, 713 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 969 , 111 S.Ct. 433 , 112 L.Ed.2d 417 (1990).
cited Cited "see" White v. MILWAUKEE WIRE PRODUCTS
E.D. Wis. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Griffin (2×)
2d Cir. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. at 135 ; see also United States v. Goodman, 165 F.3d 169, 172-73 (2d Cir. 1999) (finding no breach where the government responded to a specific request from the district court to "supply the Court with the law and the facts" without advocating that such an adjustment should be imposed), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 874 , 120 S.Ct. 318 , 145 L.Ed.2d 150 (1999).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Eastern America Trio Products, Inc. v. Tang Electronic Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 2000 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Elk Corp. v. GAF Building Materials Corp., 168 F.3d 28, 30 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 178 , 145 L.Ed.2d 150 (1999) (inequitable conduct) with Pentech Int’l, Inc. v. Hayduchok, 18 U.S.P.Q.2d 1337 , 1345-46 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (fraud).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Black
10th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Goodman, 165 F.3d 169, 174 (2d Cir.) ("Though we have no need to consider whether this broad waiver form might ever be enforceable, we conclude that it is not enforceable in this case.”) (citations omitted), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 318 , 145 L.Ed.2d 150 (1999); United States v. Martinez-Rios, 143 F.3d 662, 668 (2d Cir.1998) ("In the absence of any indication that the defendants understood and knowingly agreed to this unusual form of appellate waiver, we conclude that it is ineffective.”) Even in an instance in which it ultimately enforced such a broad…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.
v.
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.
No. 99-117.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1999.
528 U.S. 873

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.