green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Taunt v. General Retirement System of Detroit (In re Wilcox)
But see In re Lowenschuss, 171 F.3d 673 , 682 (9th Cir.) (holding that a state anti-alienation provision must contain some “mechanism” for enforcement in order to satisfy § 541(c)(2)), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 877 , 120 S.Ct. 185 , 145 L.Ed.2d 156 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Delta Mine Holding Company Meadowlark, Inc. v. Afc Coal Properties, Inc.
“Unless there is a specific [statutory] ground for vacating an award, it must be confirmed.” IDS Life Ins., 266 F.3d at 650 ; see ANR Coal Co., Inc. v. Cogentrix of N.C., 173 F.3d 493, 499 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 877 , 120 S.Ct. 186 , 145 L.Ed.2d 156 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Stanton
Domicile means actual residence coupled with a present intention to remain there. 4 CollieR on BANKRUPTCY ¶ 522.06 (Henry Sommer & Alan Resnick, eds., 16th ed. 2011) (emphasis supplied); see also Lowenschuss v. Selnick (In re Lowenschuss), 171 F.3d 673, 684 (9th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 877 , 120 S.Ct. 185 , 145 L.Ed.2d 156 (1999) (debtor satisfied both *86 physical presence and intent requirements for establishing domicile); Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30, 48 , 109 S.Ct. 1597 , 104 L.Ed.2d 29 (1989) (“For adults, domicile is established by physical p…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alex Montez, Jr. v. Prudential Securities, Inc.
See, e.g., ANR Coal Co. v. Cogentrix of North Carolina, Inc., 173 F.3d 493, 500 (4th Cir.1999) (ANR), (to establish evident partiality, the party seeking vacatur under 9 U.S.C. § 10 (a)(2) has the burden to demonstrate “that a reasonable person would have to conclude that an arbitrator was partial to the other party to the arbitration”) (citing Consolidation Coal Co. v. Local 1643, United Mine Workers, 48 F.3d 125, 128 (4th Cir.1995)) cert. denied, 528 U.S. 877 , 120 S.Ct. 186 , 145 L.Ed.2d 156 (1999); Gianelli Money Purchase Plan & Trust v. ADM Investor Servs., Inc., 146 F.3d 1309, 1312 …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pink
v.
Modoc Indian Health Project, Inc.
v.
Modoc Indian Health Project, Inc.
No. 99-182.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1999.
Published
C. A, 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.