green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.4 score
“because it is an affirmative defense and because respondents move for dismissal, respondents bear the burden of establishing that california's procedural default rules are adequate to bar federal review.”
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Joseph Murl Bennett v. Glen Mueller, Warden Terhune, Director Attorney Generalof the State of California
because it is an affirmative defense and because respondents move for dismissal, respondents bear the burden of establishing that california's procedural default rules are adequate to bar federal review.
discussed
Cited "see"
Duvardo v. Giurbino
See Bean v. Calderon, 163 F.3d 1073, 1087 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999) (Mikes rule did not apply because fingerprint evidence was supplemented with other circumstantial evidence of guilt).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Detention of Bergen
See State v. Dennison, 115 Wash.2d 609, 629 , 801 P.2d 193 (1990) (refusing to consider issues raised without citation to authority). [9] Reply Br. of Appellant at 4 (citing In re Young, 122 Wash.2d at 26 , 857 P.2d 989 ). [10] Cashaw, 123 Wash.2d at 144 , 866 P.2d 8 . [11] Id. [12] Detention of Enright, 131 Wash.App. 706, 714 , 128 P.3d 1266 (2006), review denied, 158 Wash.2d 1029 , 152 P.3d 1033 (2007). [13] Cashaw, 123 Wash.2d at 144 , 866 P.2d 8 . [14] Id. [15] Id. [16] 123 Wash.2d 138, 147 , 866 P.2d 8 (1994). [17] Id. at 146 , 866 P.2d 8 (quoting Kentucky Dep't of Corrections v. Thompson…
cited
Cited "see"
Assa'ad-Faltas v. President of University of SC
See Assa’ad-Faltas v. Univ. of S.C., No. 96-2159(L), 1998 WL 792209 (4th Cir. Nov.16, 1998) (unpublished), cert, denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Monschke
See State v. Finch, 137 Wash.2d 792, 845 , 975 P.2d 967 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999); Hutchinson, 135 Wash.2d at 888 , 959 P.2d 1061 ; State v. Jennings, 111 Wash.App. 54, 61 , 44 P.3d 1 (2002) (stun belt), review denied, 148 Wash.2d 1001 , 60 P.3d 1212 (2003). ¶ 53 Here, after ruling that Monschke be required to wear a stun belt under his clothes during trial, the court instructed defense counsel to bring any visibility concerns to the court's attention.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lovelace
See United States v. Allen, 357 F.3d 745 (8th Cir.Mo. 2004), citing State v. Finch, 137 Wash.2d 792 , 975 P.2d 967, 1007-08 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. CJ
See generally State v. Finch, 137 Wash.2d 792, 810 , 975 P.2d 967 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Damon
See State v. Finch, 137 Wash.2d 792, 873 , 975 P.2d 967 (Talmadge, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
William Lee Shackleford v. Susan Hubbard, Warden
See Bean v. Calderon, 163 F.3d 1073, 1077 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999); Allen v. Crabtree, 153 F.3d 1030, 1032 (9th Cir.1998), cer t. denied, 525 U.S. 1091 , 119 S.Ct. 846 , 142 L.Ed.2d 700 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Sandoval v. Calderon
See Bean v. Calderon, 163 F.3d 1073, 1086 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Sandoval v. Calderon
See Bean v. Calderon, 163 F.3d 1073, 1086 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael Jackson v. Arthur Calderon, Warden
See Bean v. Calderon, 163 F.3d 1073, 1080-81 (9th Cir.1998) (presentation of medical experts without preparation and foundation prejudicial at penalty phase), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Times Mirror Magazines, Inc. v. Las Vegas Sports News, L.L.C., D/B/A Las Vegas Sporting News
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Ringling Bros., 955 F.Supp. 598, 605 (E.D.Va.1997), aff'd on other grounds, 170 F.3d 449 (4th Cir.1999)(reserving constitutional issue for another day), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 286 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999); see also 25 U.S.C. §§ 1116 (a), 1117(a), 1118; 2 Gilson § 5.12[1][c][vii].
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Souther
(2×)
See State v. Finch, 137 Wash.2d 792, 839 , 975 P.2d 967 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Souther
(2×)
See State v. Finch, 137 Wn.2d 792, 839 , 975 P.2d 967 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S. Ct. 285 , 145 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Planet Hollywood (Region IV), Inc. v. Hollywood Casino Corp.
See Syndicate Sales, Inc., 192 F.3d 633 , 52 U.S.P.Q.2d 1035, 1040 (7th Cir.1999) (citing Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. Utah Div. of Travel Dev., 170 F.3d 449, 452 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 286 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999)); I.P.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. SAO
See also State v. Finch, 137 Wash.2d 792, 865 , 975 P.2d 967 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. BILLIE JEROME ALLEN, —
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Finch, 137 Wash.2d 792 , 975 P.2d 967, 1007-08 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999) (finding that there is no such thing as “overwhelming evidence” of the death penalty because although there can be objective evidence of a person’s guilt or evidence, such that a reviewing court can say whether a trial jury’s deliberations would have come out the same way as to the underlying offense, aggravating and mitigating factors are “of a more subjective nature ...”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rhee Bros., Inc. v. Han Ah Reum Corp.
See, e.g., Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. Utah Div. of Travel Develop., 170 F.3d 449, 452 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 923 , 120 S.Ct. 286 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999); see also Panavision Int’l, L.P. v. Toeppen, 141 F.3d 1316, 1324 (9th Cir.1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Silva
See also, United States v. Robinson, 913 F.2d 712 (9th Cir.1990) (pretrial detainee not deprived of right of access by being required to choose between appointed counsel and one box of legal materials). [33] Taylor, 880 F.2d at 1047. [34] Taylor, 880 F.2d at 1042. [35] See State v. Finch, 137 Wash.2d 792 , 975 P.2d 967 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999). [36] State v. Kolocotronis, 73 Wash.2d 92, 97 , 436 P.2d 774 (1968); State v. Barker, 75 Wash.App. 236, 238 , 881 P.2d 1051 (1994); State v. Breedlove, 79 Wash.App. 101, 105-06 , 900 P.2d 586 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eli Lilly & Company, an Indiana Corporation v. Natural Answers, Incorporated, a Florida Corporation, and Brian A. Feinstein
Compare Westchester Media v. PRL USA Holdings, Inc., 214 F.3d 658, 671 (requiring proof of actual harm) and Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shoius, Inc. v. Utah Div. of Travel Dev., 170 F.3d 449, 461 (4th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 923 , 120 S.Ct. 286 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999) with Nabisco, 191 F.3d at 224-25 (likelihood of dilution sufficient).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carnival Corp. v. SeaEscape Casino Cruises, Inc.
Compare Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. Utah Div. of Travel Dev., 170 F.3d 449 , (4th Cir.1999), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 286 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999) with Nabisco, Inc. v. PF Brands, Inc., 191 F.3d 208 (2d Cir.1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Assa'ad-Faltas
v.
University of South Carolina and Assa'ad-Faltas v. Attorney General of Virginia
v.
University of South Carolina and Assa'ad-Faltas v. Attorney General of Virginia
No. 98-2001.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1999.
C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of petitioner to consolidate this case with No. 98-1189, Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth et al. [certiorari granted, 526 U. S. 1038], denied. Motion of petitioner to strike the brief in opposition and other relief denied. Certiorari denied.
Justice Souter took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions and this petition.Reported below: 165 F. 3d 910 (first judgment); 164 F. 3d 623 (second judgment).