green
Positive treatment
8.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. True
See, True v. United States, 528 U.S. 976 , 120 S.Ct. 424 , 145 L.Ed.2d 332 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Darren Demeatrie Gordon
(2×)
See United States v. De Varon, 175 F.3d 930 , 937 & n.3 (11th Cir.) (en banc) (“This Court has long and repeatedly held that a district court’s determination of a defendant’s role in the offense is a finding of fact to be reviewed only for clear error.”), cert. denied, -- U.S. --, 120 S. Ct. 424 , 145 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Roberts, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Rodriguez De Varon, 175 F.3d 930, 943-44 (11th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 424 , 145 L.Ed.2d 331 (1999) (“[I]n determining a defendant’s role in the offense, a district court must measure the defendant’s role against the relevant conduct attributed to her in calculating her base offense level....
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Akanni Hamzat
(2×)
See United States v. Rodriguez De Varon, 175 F.3d 930, 941-44 (11th Cir.1999) (en banc), cert. denied — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 424 , 145 L.Ed.2d 331 (1999); United States v. James, 157 F.3d 1218, 1220 (10th Cir.1998); United States v. Marmolejo, 106 F.3d 1213, 1217 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Lewis, 93 F.3d 1075, 1085 (2d Cir.1996); United States v. Olibrices, 979 F.2d 1557, 1560-61 (D.C.Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hamzat, Akanni
See United States v. Rodriguez de Varon, 175 F.3d 930, 941-44 (11th Cir. 1999) (en banc), cert. denied 120 S. Ct. 424 (1999) (No. 99-6150); United States v. James, 157 F.3d 1218, 1220 (10th Cir. 1998); United States v. Marmolejo, 106 F.3d 1213, 1217 (5th Cir. 1997); United States v. Lewis, 93 F.3d 1075, 1085 (2d Cir. 1996); United States v. Olibrices, 979 F.2d 1557 , 1560- 61 (D.C.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rafael J. Felici
See United States v. True, 179 F.3d 1087, 1088-89 (8th Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 424 , 145 L.Ed.2d 332 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rafael J. Felici
See United States v. True, No. 98-3824, 1999 WL 604202 , at *2 (8th Cir. Aug. 11, 1999), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 424 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Greer
(2×)
See id. ("[I]f [the defendant's] offense level is raised, either in the selection of a base level or by an upward adjustment, . . . a mitigating role reduction might be warranted if the defendant's role in the conduct supporting the higher level is minor."); see also United States v. Rodriguez De Varon, 175 F.3d 930, 941 (11th Cir.) ( en banc ) ("[T]he district court must assess whether the defendant is a minor or minimal participant in relation to the relevant conduct attributed to the defendant in calculating her base offense level."), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 976 , 120 S.Ct. 424 , 145 L.Ed.2d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Greer
(2×)
See id. (“[I]f [the defendant’s] offense level is raised, either in the selection of a base level or by an upward adjustment, ... a mitigating role reduction might be warranted if the defendant’s role in the conduct supporting the higher level is minor.”); see also United States v. Rodriguez De Varon, 175 F.3d 930, 941 (11th Cir.) (“[T]he district court must assess whether the defendant is a minor or minimal participant in relation to the relevant conduct attributed to the defendant in calculating her base offense level.”), ce rt. denied, — U.S. --, 120 S.Ct. 424 , 145 L.Ed.2d 33…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Greer
See id. ("[I]f [the defendant's] offense level is raised, either in the selection of a base level or by an upward adjustment, . . . a mitigating role reduction might be warranted if the defendant's role in the conduct supporting the higher level is minor."); see also United States v. Rodriguez De Varon, 175 F.3d 930, 941 (11th Cir.) ("[T]he district court must assess whether the defendant is a minor or minimal participant in relation to the relevant conduct attributed to the defendant in calculating her base offense level."), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 424 (1999). 111 Thus, the District Court di…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Greer
(2×)
See id. (“[I]f [the defendant’s] offense level is raised, either in the selection of a base level or by an upward adjustment, ... a mitigating role reduction might be warranted if the defendant’s role in the conduct supporting the higher level is minor.”); see also United States v. Rodriguez De Varon, 175 F.3d 930, 941 (11th Cir.) (en banc) (“[T]he district court must assess whether the defendant is a minor or minimal participant in relation to the relevant conduct attributed to the defendant in calculating her base offense level.”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 976 , 120 S.Ct. 424 , 145…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McCleary v. National Cold Storage, Inc.
See, e.g., Anderson v. General Motors Corp., 176 F.3d 488 , 1999 WL 240242 , at *2 (10th Cir. Apr. 20, 1999) (Table), petition for cert. denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 424 , — L.Ed.2d - (1999); Bolton, 36 F.3d at 944 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rodriguez de Varon
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 99-6150.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 1, 1999.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.