green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Haselrig v. United States
But see Porter v. United States, 163 F.3d 1304, 1321-22 (Fed.Cir.1998), reh'g denied and en banc suggestion declined, cert. denied, 528 U.S. 809 , 120 S.Ct. 41 , 145 L.Ed.2d 37 (1999). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Levy v. United States
See Skinner v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 322 , 594 F.2d 824 (Ct.Cl.1979).” Porter v. United States, 163 F.3d 1304, 1312 (Fed.Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 809 , 120 S.Ct. 41 , 145 L.Ed.2d 37 (1999); see also Clinton v. Goldsmith, 526 U.S. 529, 539 , 119 S.Ct. 1538 , 143 L.Ed.2d 720 (1999) (holding “that ‘[BCMR] decisions are subject to judicial review [by federal courts] and can be set aside if they are arbitrary, capricious, or not based on substantial evidence.’” (quoting Chappell v. Wallace, 462 U.S. 296, 303 , 103 S.Ct. 2362 , 76 L.Ed.2d 586 , (1983)) (alterations in original…
cited
Cited "see"
Wisotsky v. United States
See Skinner v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 322 , 594 F.2d 824 (1979).” Porter v. United States, 163 F.3d 1304, 1312 (Fed.Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 809 , 120 S.Ct. 41 , 145 L.Ed.2d 37 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Steier v. Best
See In re Hindenlang, 164 F.3d 1029, 1034 (6th Cir.) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 810 , 120 S.Ct. 41 , 145 L.Ed.2d 37 (1999); Mead v. Helm, 1989 WL 292, at *4 (6th Cir. Jan.4, 1989) (per curiam) (citing FED.
cited
Cited "see"
Hoffman v. United States
See Skinner v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 322 , 594 F.2d 824 (1979).” Porter v. United States, 163 F.3d 1304, 1312 (Fed.Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 809 , 120 S.Ct. 41 , 145 L.Ed.2d 37 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re: James H. Hatton Debtor. United States of America v. James H. Hatton
See United States v. Hindenlang (In re Hindenlang), 164 F.3d 1029, 1032 (6th Cir.) (‘We think it is appropriate to look to the Internal Revenue Code to determine the proper definition of return.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 41 , 145 L.Ed.2d 37 (1999); Bergstrom v. United States (In re Bergstrom), 949 F.2d 341, 343 (10th Cir.1991) (relying on the definition of “return” under the I.R.C. in determining whether a substitute return is sufficient to satisfy section 523(a)(l)(B)(i)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Farmerie, A. v. Kramer, J.
See also Prince George Center, Inc. v. United States Gypsum Co., 704 A.2d 141, 145 (Pa.Super. 1997), appeal denied, 557 Pa. 640 , 732 A.2d 1210 (1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 810 , 120 S.Ct. 41 , 145 L.Ed.2d 37 (1999) (indicating this Court does not have jurisdiction over either trial court’s denial of motion for reconsideration or issues initially raised in motion for reconsideration).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lockwood v. United States
In this regard, the United States Supreme Court has stated that, “judges are not given the task of running the [Service branch] ... [T]he military constitutes a specialized community governed by a separate discipline from that of the civilian.” Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 93-94 , 73 S.Ct. 534 , 97 L.Ed. 842 , reh’g denied, 345 U.S. 931 , 73 S.Ct. 779 , 97 L.Ed. 1360 (1953); see also Porter v. United States, 163 F.3d 1304, 1316 (Fed.Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 809 , 120 S.Ct. 41 , 145 L.Ed.2d 37 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brookins v. Untied States
The United States Supreme Court has confirmed that “judges are not given the task of running the Army____ The military constitutes a specialized community governed by a separate discipline from that of the civilian.” Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 93, 94 , 73 S.Ct. 534 , 97 L.Ed. 842 , reh’g denied, 345 U.S. 931 , 73 S.Ct. 779 , 97 L.Ed. 1360 (1953); see also Porter v. United States, 163 F.3d 1304, 1316 (Fed.Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 809 , 120 S.Ct. 41 , 145 L.Ed.2d 37 (1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ehrig v. United States Ex Rel. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Ehrig)
See, e.g., United States v. Hindenlang (In re Hindenlang), 164 F.3d 1029, 1033 (6th Cir.), cert. denied 528 U.S. 810 , 120 S.Ct. 41 , 145 L.Ed.2d 37 (1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Woods v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Woods)
Compare, e.g., In re Hindenlang, 164 F.3d 1029 (6th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 810 , 120 S.Ct. 41 , 145 L.Ed.2d 37 (1999), with In re Nunez, 232 B.R. 778 (9th Cir. BAP 1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alexander
v.
Merit Systems Protection Board
v.
Merit Systems Protection Board
No. 98-1662.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1999.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.