green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.2 score
“we conclude that a first-served defendant can consent to a later-served defendant's removal petition, despite having already failed in its own efforts to remove”
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Branch v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
we conclude that a first-served defendant can consent to a later-served defendant's removal petition, despite having already failed in its own efforts to remove
cited
Cited "see"
Thomas P. Loftis v. United Parcel Service, Inc. David Cole, Kenneth Adkins
See Brierly v. Alusuisse Flexible Packaging, Inc., 184 F.3d 527 , 533 n. 3 (6th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1076 , 120 S.Ct. 790 , 145 L.Ed.2d 667 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Weeden v. Auto Workers Credit Union
See Weeden v. Auto Workers Credit Union, Inc., No. 97-3073, 1999 WL 191430 (6th Cir. Mar.19, 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1076 , 120 S.Ct. 790 , 145 L.Ed.2d 667 (2000) (Weeden I).
discussed
Cited "see"
Griffith v. American Home Products Corp.
(2×)
See Brierly v. Alusuisse Flexible Packaging, Inc., 184 F.3d 527 , 533 and 533 n. 3 (6th Cir.1999), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 120 S.Ct. 790 , 145 L.Ed.2d 667 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vincent
v.
Delta Airlines, Inc.
v.
Delta Airlines, Inc.
No. 99-684.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 2000.
Published
Citer courts: D. South Carolina (1)
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.