green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.1 score
“upon a finding of exceptional circumstances, such as were found in this case, a trial court may allow a witness to testify via two-way closed-circuit television when this furthers the interest of justice.”
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Duhs v. Capra
upon a finding of exceptional circumstances, such as were found in this case, a trial court may allow a witness to testify via two-way closed-circuit television when this furthers the interest of justice.
discussed
Cited "see"
Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen International Distribution Ltd.
United States v. Garcia-Alvarez, 541 F.3d 8, 17 (1st Cir.2008); accord United States v. Gigante, 982 F.Supp. 140, 176 (E.D.N.Y.1997), aff'd, 166 F.3d 75 (2d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1114 , 120 S.Ct. 931 , 145 L.Ed.2d 811 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald
Accord United States v. Gigante, 982 F.Supp. 140, 176 (E.D.N.Y.1997), aff'd, 166 F.3d 75 (2d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1114 , 120 S.Ct. 931 , 145 L.Ed.2d 811 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stevens v. State
See United States v. Gigante, 166 F.3d 75, 81-82 (2nd Cir.1999) (holding that upon a finding of exceptional circumstances, such as when a witness has a fatal illness and is part of the Federal Witness Protection Program, a trial court may allow a witness to testify via two-way closed circuit television when this furthers the interest of justice), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1114 , 120 S.Ct. 931 , 145 L.Ed.2d 811 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Session v. Perry
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Metts v. Murphy , No. 02-2204 (1st Cir. Dec. 3, 2003) (order granting petition for rehearing en banc). [76] See, e.g., Valdespino v. Alamo Heights Ind. School Dist., 168 F.3d 848, 852-53 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1114 , 120 S.Ct. 931 , 145 L.Ed.2d 811 (2000); Cousin v. Sundquist, 145 F.3d 818, 827-29 (6th Cir.1998); Colleton County Council v. McConnell, 201 F.Supp.2d 618, 643 (D.S.C.2002). [77] 512 U.S. 997 , 114 S.Ct. 2647 , 129 L.Ed.2d 775 (1994). [78] Id. at 1015-16 , 114 S.Ct. 2647 . [79] Id. at 1018-19, 1023-24 , 114 S.Ct. 2647 ; see also, Barnett v. City of Chicago, 141…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Monteleone, Sr., Also Known as \Joe Monte\"
See United States v. Gigante, 166 F.3d 75, 83 (2d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1114 , 120 S.Ct. 931 , 145 L.Ed.2d 811 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Robinson v. State
See generally People v. Scott, 64 Cal.App.4th 550, 561-70 , 75 Cal.Rptr.2d 315, 322-28 (Cal.App. 2 Dist.1998), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 931 , 145 L.Ed.2d 811 (2000). 8.
cited
Cited "see"
Boivin v. Black
See Collins v. Montgomery County Bd. of Prison Inspectors, 176 F.3d 679, 686 (3d Cir.1999) (en banc), cert. denied, — Ú.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 932 , 145 L.Ed.2d 811 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Herrera-Inirio v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See New York v. United States, 179 F.3d 29 , 33-34 (2d Cir.1999), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 932 , 145 L.Ed.2d 811 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. Daley
I recognize that three courts of appeals have upheld the § 1997(e) limits on attorney fee awards, see Hadix v. Johnson, 230 F.3d 840 (6th Cir.2000); Boivin v. Black, 225 F.3d 36 (1st Cir.2000); Madrid v. Gomez, 190 F.3d 990 (9th Cir.1999); see also Collins v. Montgomery County Board of Prison Inspectors, 176 F.3d 679, 686 (3d Cir.1999), 1 cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1115 , 120 S.Ct. 932 , 145 L.Ed.2d 811 (2000) (en banc panel divided equally on constitutionality of provision limiting fees to 150% of judgment), and that federal statutes carry a presumption of constitutionality not easily overcome.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Collins
v.
Montgomery County Board of Prison Inspectors
v.
Montgomery County Board of Prison Inspectors
No. 99-270.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 2000.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. New York (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.