Am. S.S. Owners Mut. Prot. & Indem. Ass'n v. United States Lines, Inc., 529 U.S. 1038 (2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Am. S.S. Owners Mut. Prot. & Indem. Ass'n v. United States Lines, Inc., 529 U.S. 1038 (2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
43 citation events (43 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: James M. Hayes v. Faulkner Cty., AR (ca8, 2004-10-29)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" James M. Hayes v. Faulkner Cty., AR
8th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harmon v. City of Kansas City, 197 F.3d 321, 329 (8th Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, 529 U.S. 1038 , 120 S.Ct. 1534 , 146 L.Ed.2d 348 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" Hayes v. Faulkner County
8th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harmon v. City of Kansas City, 197 F.3d 321, 329 (8th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1038 , 120 S.Ct. 1534 , 146 L.Ed.2d 348 (2000). 22 The district court may allow attorney's fees to the prevailing party in a § 1983 action. 42 U.S.C. § 1988 .
discussed Cited "see" Clay Regional Water v. City of Spirit Lake, Iowa
N.D. Iowa · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fuller v. Ulland, 76 F.3d 957 , 959 (8th Cir.1996). *1155 Harmon v. City of Kansas City, Mo., 197 F.3d 321, 325 (8th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1038 , 120 S.Ct. 1534 , 146 L.Ed.2d 348 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" Hain v. Gibson
10th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Parker v. Bowersox, 188 F.3d 923, 931 (8th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1038 , 120 S.Ct. 1534 , 146 L.Ed.2d 348 (2000); United States v. McVeigh, 153 F.3d 1166, 1217 (10th Cir.1998); Woods v. Johnson, 75 F.3d 1017, 1038 (5th Cir.1996); Robison v. Maynard, 943 F.2d 1216, 1217 (10th Cir.1991); but see Alley v. Bell, 101 F.Supp.2d 588 , 648 n. 46 (W.D.Tenn.2000) (“Petitioner argues that Payne left portions of Booth intact, but this Court does not read Payne as so limited.”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Farmland Industries, Inc.
Bankr. W.D. Mo. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States Lines, Inc. v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass’n, Inc. (In re United States Lines, Inc.), 197 F.3d 631, 640 (2nd Cir.1999) (stating that even in core proceedings, in which the interest of the bankruptcy court is greater, the bankruptcy court nonetheless might lack discretion to refuse a stay in favor of arbitration), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1038 , 120 S.Ct. 1532 , 146 L.Ed.2d 347 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Assn., Inc.
v.
United States Lines, Inc.
No. 99-1273.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 27, 2000.
529 U.S. 1038
Published

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.