green
Positive treatment
8.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Bonita Perry v. Commonwealth of PA
See Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Bd. of Trustees of the Univ. of Alabama v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356 , 121 S.Ct. 955 , 148 L.Ed.2d 866 (2001) and Bd. of Trustees of the Univ. of Alabama v. Garrett, 529 U.S. 1065 , 120 S.Ct. 1669 , 146 L.Ed.2d 479 (2000) (granting certiorari on the issue of “[wjhether the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution bars suits by private citizens in federal court under the Americans With Disabilities Act against non-consenting states”).
cited
Cited "see"
Tony Eugene Saffold v. Anthony Newland
See Bennett v. Artuz, 199 F.3d 116 (2d Cir.1999), cert. granted, 529 U.S. 1065, 120 S.Ct. 1669 , 146 L.Ed.2d 479 (2000). .
cited
Cited "see"
Fronczak v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
See Garrett v. University of Alabama, 193 F.3d 1214 (1999), cert. granted, 529 U.S. 1065 , 120 S.Ct. 1669 , 146 L.Ed.2d 479 (2000). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Bylsma v. Bailey
See Garrett v. The University of Alabama at Birmingham Board of Trustees, 193 F.3d 1214 (11th Cir.1999), cert. granted on another issue sub nom, 529 U.S. 1065 , 120 S.Ct. 1669 , 146 L.Ed.2d 479 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Regenia G. Townsel v. State of Missouri
See - U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 1669 , 146 L.Ed.2d 479 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. Nakatani
See University of Ala. at Birmingham Bd. of Trustees v. Garrett, 529 U.S. 1065 , 120 S.Ct. 1669 , 146 L.Ed.2d 479 (April 17, 2000) (granting certiorari); see also Walker v. Missouri Dep’t of Corrections, 213 F.3d 1035 , 1036 n. 2 (8th Cir.2000) (noting that the question presented in Garrett is “Does the 11th Amendment bar suits by private citizens in federal court under [the ADA] against nonconsenting states?”).
cited
Cited "see"
Dennis Isham v. Michael Randle, Warden
See Bennett v. Artuz, 199 F.3d 116 (2d Cir.1999) cert. granted Artuz v. Bennett, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 1669 , 146 L.Ed.2d 479 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Cisneros v. Wilson
See University of Alabama at Birmingham Bd. of Trustees v. Garrett, - U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 1669 , 146 L.Ed.2d 479 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Parker v. Universidad De Puerto Rico
See University of Alabama at Birmingham Bd. of Trustees v. Garrett, — U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 1669 , 146 L.Ed.2d 479 (2000) (granting certiorari to address whether states have Eleventh Amendment immunity from claims brought under the ADA); Kimel v. Florida Bd. of Regents, — U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 631 , 145 L.Ed.2d 522 (2000) (holding that Congress lacks power to abrogate state sovereign immunity under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act).
cited
Cited "see"
Lavia v. Pennsylvania, Department of Corrections
See University of Ala. at Birmingham Bd. of Trustees v. Garrett, -U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 1669 , 146 L.Ed.2d 479 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Saffold v. Newland
See Bennett v. Artuz, 199 F.3d 116 (2d Cir.1999), cert. granted, U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 1669 , 146 L.Ed.2d 479 (2000). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Margaret A. Walker v. Missouri Department of Corrections
See Garrett v. University of Ala. at Birmingham Bd. of Trustees, 193 F.3d 1214 , 1218 (11th Cir.1999), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 1669 , 146 L.Ed.2d 479 (2000); see also 68 U.S.L.W. 3649 (Apr. 17, 2000) (explaining that "Question presented [is]: Does the 11th Amendment bar suits by private citizens , in federal court under Americans with Disabilities Act against non-consenting states?”).
cited
Cited "see"
Neinast v. State of Texas
See University of Ala. at Birmingham Bd. of Trustees v. Garrett,-U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 1669 , 146 L.Ed.2d 479 (2000). 30 . 166 F.3d 698 (4th Cir.1999). 31 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Sherman Walker v. Christopher Artuz, Superintendent
See Bennett v. Artuz, 199 F.3d 116, 119 (2d Cir.1999) (holding that the “AEDPA’s pending-state-petition tolling provision does apply to a petition challenging a pre-AEDPA conviction”), cert. granted, — U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 1669 , 146 L.Ed.2d 479 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kevin Smith v. Michael McGinnis Superintendent, Southport Correctional Facility
See Bennett v. Artuz, 199 F.3d 116, 119 (2d Cir.1999) (holding that “AEDPA’s pending-state-petition tolling provision does apply to a petition challenging a pre-AEDPA conviction”), cert. granted, — U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 1669 , 146 L.Ed.2d 479 (2000). *16 Section 2244(d)(2) states: “The time during which a properly filed application for State post-conviction or other collateral review with respect to the pertinent judgment or claim is pending shall not be counted toward any period of limitation under this subsection.” 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (d)(2).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Serafin v. Connecticut Department of Mental Health & Addiction Services
Since the Court issued its ruling on the motion to dismiss, however, the clear ma *276 jority of courts that have considered this issue have reached a contrary conclusion. 3 See, e.g., Hale, 219 F.3d at 66-67 ; Philbrick v. University of Conn., 90 F.Supp.2d 195 (D.Conn.2000); McGregor v. Goord, 18 F.Supp.2d 204 (N.D.N.Y.1998); see also Garrett v. University of Ala. at Birmingham Bd. of Trustees, 193 F.3d 1214 (11th Cir.1999), cert. granted in part, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 1669 , 146 L.Ed.2d 479 (2000); Kilvitis v. County of Luzerne, 52 F.Supp.2d 403 (M.D.Pa.1999); Sims v. University of Cincinnat…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Angel Fernandez v. Jerry Sternes, Warden, Dixon Correctional Center
See also Bennett v. Artuz, 199 F.3d 116 , 121—23 (2d Cir.1999), cert. granted, _ U.S. _, 120 S.Ct. 1669 , 146 L.Ed.2d 479 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Steele
v.
California Department of Social Services
v.
California Department of Social Services
No. 99-7476.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 17, 2000.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis [528 U. S. 1148] denied.