Osage Tribal Council v. Dep't of Labor, 530 U.S. 1229 (2000). · Go Syfert
Osage Tribal Council v. Dep't of Labor, 530 U.S. 1229 (2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
202 citation events (173 in the last 25 years) across 33 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jefferson Capital Systems, LLC v. Bankruptcy Processing Solutions, Inc. (txwd, 2020-01-31)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Jefferson Capital Systems, LLC v. Bankruptcy Processing Solutions, Inc.
W.D. Tex. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Acuna v. Brown & Root, Inc., 200 F.3d 335, 339 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1229 (2000).
cited Cited "see" Deep Marine Technology, Inc. v. Conmaco/Rector, L.P.
S.D. Tex. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Acuna v. Brown & Root Inc., 200 F.3d 335, 339 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1229 , 120 S.Ct. 2658 , 147 L.Ed.2d 273 (2000); Manguno v. Prudential Prop. & Cas.
cited Cited "see" Osarczuk v. Associated Universities, Inc.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
II, supra at 855; see Acuna v Brown & Root Inc., 200 F3d 335, 339 [2000], cert denied 530 US 1229 [2000]).
cited Cited "see" Equitec-Cole Roesler LLC v. McClanahan
S.D. Tex. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Spivey v. Robertson, 197 F.3d 772, 774 (5th Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, 530 U.S. 1229 , 120 S.Ct. 2659 , 147 L.Ed.2d 274 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" Gary Bradley v. W.A. Duncan, Warden (2×)
9th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Barker v. Yukins, 199 F.3d 867, 875-76 (6th Cir.1999) (granting habeas relief under AED-PA because the erroneous self-defense instruction deprived the defendant’s of a “meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense”) (relying on Trombetta, 467 U.S. at 485 , 104 S.Ct. 2528 ), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1229 , 120 S.Ct. 2658 , 147 L.Ed.2d 273 (2000).
cited Cited "see" Tremblay v. Philip Morris, Inc.
D.N.H. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Acuna v. Brown & Root Inc., 200 F.3d 335, 339 (5th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1229 , 120 S.Ct. 2658 , 147 L.Ed.2d 273 (2000); Burns v. Windsor Ins.
examined Cited "see" Braxton v. Dillon Companies, Inc. (3×)
10th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sac & Fox Nation of Okla. v. Cuomo, 193 F.3d 1162 , 1165 (10th Cir. 1999) (12(b)(1)), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1229 , 120 S.Ct. 2657 , 147 L.Ed.2d 272 (2000); Sutton v. Utah State Sch. for the Deaf & Blind, 173 F.3d 1226, 1236 (10th Cir.1999) (12(b)(6)).
discussed Cited "see" Teresa Bartoszewska-Zajac v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (2×)
6th Cir. · 2001 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Tefel v. Reno, 180 F.3d 1286, 1299 (11th Cir.1999), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 120 S.Ct. 2657 , 147 L.Ed.2d 272 (2000) (denying an equal protection challenge to the stop-time provision).
discussed Cited "see" Pittman v. Cole (2×)
S.D. Ala. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tefel v. Reno, 180 F.3d 1286 (11th Cir.1999), reh’g and suggestion for reh’g en banc denied by 198 F.3d 265 and cert. denied by — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 2657 , 147 L.Ed.2d 272 ; Northeastern Florida, 896 F.2d at 1284; Levi Strauss & Co. v. Sunrise Int’l Trading Inc., 51 F.3d 982 , 985 (11th Cir.1995); McDonald’s Corp. v. Robertson, 147 F.3d 1301, 1306 (11th Cir.1998); Cunningham v. Adams, 808 F.2d 815, 819 (11th Cir.1987); and Canal Auth. of the State of Florida, v. Callaway, 489 F.2d 567, 572 (5th Cir.1974).
examined Cited "see" Alicia Wai Ling Tang v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (4×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
8th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tefel v. Reno, 180 F.3d 1286, 1289 (11th Cir.1999) (Tefel), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 2657 , 147 L.Ed.2d 272 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" Alicia Wai Ling Tang v. INS (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
8th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tefel v. Reno, 180 F.3d 1286, 1289 (11th Cir. 1999) (Tefel), cert. denied, 120 S.Ct. 2657 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" Dominick Akinwale v. Janet Reno (2×)
11th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tefel v. Reno, 180 F.3d 1286, 1295 (11th Cir.1999), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 2657 , 147 L.Ed.2d 272 (2000); Mayers v. INS, 175 F.3d 1289, 1295 (11th Cir.1999). 4 .Under IIRIRA, deportation orders are now called removal orders.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Barnes v. 7-Eleven Inc
N.D. Tex. · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Baker v. Putnal, 75 F.3d 190, 196 (5th Cir. 1996); see also Spivey v. Robertson, 197 F.3d 772, 774 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1229 (2000).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Miller v. Meacham
N.D. Tex. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low
Baker v. Putnal, 75 F.3d 190, 196 (5th Cir. 1996); see also Spivey v. Robertson, 197 F.3d 3 772, 774 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1229 (2000).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Williamson v. Irving K Motor Company LLC
N.D. Tex. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low
Baker v. Putnal, 75 F.3d 190, 196 (5th Cir. 1996); see also Spivey v. Robertson, 197 F.3d 772, 774 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1229 (2000).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Pogo Resources, LLC v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
N.D. Tex. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low
Baker v. Putnal, 75 F.3d 190, 196 (5th Cir. 1996); see also Spivey v. Robertson, 197 F.3d 772, 774 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1229 (2000).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Sherriff v. Christian
N.D. Tex. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
Baker v. Putnal, 75 F.3d 190, 196 (5th Cir. 1996); see also Spivey v. Robertson, 197 F.3d 772, 774 (5th Cir. 1999), cert denied, 530 U.S. 1229 (2000).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Blakely v. Andrade
N.D. Tex. · 2019 · signal: see also · confidence low
Baker v. Putnal , 75 F.3d 190 , 196 (5th Cir. 1996) ; see also Spivey v. Robertson , 197 F.3d 772 , 774 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied , 530 U.S. 1229 , 120 S.Ct. 2659 , 147 L.Ed.2d 274 (2000).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Thomas v. State
N.D. Tex. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
Baker v. Putnal , 75 F.3d 190 , 196 (5th Cir. 1996) ; see also Spivey v. Robertson , 197 F.3d 772 , 774 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied , 530 U.S. 1229 , 120 S.Ct. 2659 , 147 L.Ed.2d 274 (2000).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Shaunfield v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
N.D. Tex. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
Baker v. Putnal, 75 F.3d 190, 196 (5th Cir.1996); see also Spivey v. Robertson, 197 F.3d 772, 774 (5th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1229 , 120 S.Ct. 2659 , 147 L.Ed.2d 274 (2000).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Coleman v. Bank of New York Mellon
N.D. Tex. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
Baker v. Putnal, 75 F.3d 190, 196 (5th Cir.1996); see also Spivey v. Robertson, 197 F.3d 772, 774 (5th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1229 , 120 S.Ct. 2659 , 147 L.Ed.2d 274 (2000).
examined Cited "see, e.g." Prescott v. Little Six, Inc. (3×)
8th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
Admin., 877 F.2d 715 , 716 (8th Cir.1989) (ruling that "a rejection of a claim for absolute or qualified immunity is immediately appealable"); see also Osage Tribal Council v. Department of Labor, 187 F.3d 1174, 1179 (10th Cir.1999) (ruling that "the denial of tribal immunity is an immediately appealable collateral order"), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1229 , 120 S.Ct. 2657 , 147 L.Ed.2d 272 (2000); Tamiami Partners, Ltd. v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, 63 F.3d 1030 , 1050 (11th Cir.1995) (ruling that the collateral order doctrine applies to denial of tribal sovereign immunity).
examined Cited "see, e.g." Prescott v. Little Six, Inc. (3×)
8th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
Admin., 877 F.2d 715 , 716 (8th Cir.1989) (ruling that “a rejection of a claim for absolute or qualified immunity is immediately appealable”); see also Osage Tribal Council v. Department of Labor, 187 F.3d 1174, 1179 (10th Cir.1999) (ruling that “the denial of tribal immunity is an immediately appealable collateral order”), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1229 , 120 S.Ct. 2657 , 147 L.Ed.2d 272 (2000); Tamiami Partners, Ltd. v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, 63 F.3d 1030 , 1050 (11th Cir.1995) (ruling that the collateral order doctrine applies to denial of tribal sovereign immunity).
examined Cited "see, e.g." Leonard Prescott v. Little Six, Inc. (3×)
8th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
Admin., 877 F.2d 715 , 716 (8th Cir.1989) (ruling that “a rejection of a claim for absolute or qualified immunity is immediately appealable”); see also Osage Tribal Council v. Department of Labor, 187 F.3d 1174, 1179 (10th Cir.1999) (ruling that “the denial of tribal immunity is an immediately appealable collateral order”), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1229 , 120 S.Ct. 2657 , 147 L.Ed.2d 272 (2000); Tamiami Partners, Ltd. v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, 63 F.3d 1030 , 1050 (11th Cir.1995) (ruling that the collateral order doctrine applies to denial of tribal sovereign immunity).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Calabrese v. McHugh
D. Conn. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also U.S. Borax, Inc. v. Forster, 764 So.2d 24 (Fla.App. 4th Dist.1999), review denied, ’751 So.2d 1255, 2000 WL 140254 (Fla.), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1229 , 120 S.Ct. 2659 , 147 L.Ed.2d 273 (2000) (holding that CERCLA did not preempt Florida’s nonclaim statute for filing claims against estates); but see Freudenberg-NOK General Partnership v. Thomopoulos, No. C91-297L, 1991 WL 325290 (D.N.H.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Osage Tribal Council, on Behalf of the Osage Tribe of Indians
v.
Department of Labor
No. 99-1482.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 12, 2000.
530 U.S. 1229
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.