green
Positive treatment
6.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Briscoe v. Potter
See Gergick v. Austin, 764 F.Supp. 580 (W.D.Mo.1991) (emotional distress claim not covered by FECA); Sullivan v. U.S., 428 F.Supp. 79 (D.C.Wis.1977) (same); but see Bennett v. Barnett, 210 F.3d 272 (5th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 875 , 121 S.Ct. 181 , 148 L.Ed.2d 125 (2000) (postal employee’s emotional distress claims against postal officials were preempted by FECA; denial of claims by Secretary of Labor for lack of proof indicated that FECA coverage existed). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Van Newkirk v. Miller International, Inc.
See Stone v. Autoliv ASP, Inc., 210 F.3d 1132, 1140 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 121 S.Ct. 182 (2000); Cone v. Longmont United Hospital Association, 14 5 Ms. Van Newkirk also points to alleged age-related comments made by two male sales managers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Thayer v. City of Holton
(2×)
See Stone v. Autoliv ASP, Inc., 210 F.3d 1132, 1140-41 (10th Cir.) cert. denied, 531 U.S. 876 , 121 S.Ct. 182 , 148 L.Ed.2d 125 (2000) (isolated, ambiguous, stray remark does not create a jury issue in an employment discrimination case).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sherman v. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC.
See Hawkins v. PepsiCo, Inc., 203 F.3d 274, 282 (4th Cir.)(“Law does not blindly ascribe to race all personal conflicts between individuals of different races.”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 875 , 121 S.Ct. 181 , 148 L.Ed.2d 125 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Johnson
See State v. Adams, 52 Conn. App. 643, 660 , 727 A.2d 780 (1999), aff'd, 252 Conn. 752 , 748 A.2d 872 , cert. denied, 531 U.S. 876 , 121 S. Ct. 182 , 148 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Zinke v. Slater
(2×)
See Stone v. Autoliv ASP, Inc., 210 F.3d 1132, 1140 (10th Cir.) (concluding that isolated, ambiguous and/or abstract remarks may be too abstract to support an inference of age discrimination), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 876 , 121 S.Ct. 182 , 148 L.Ed.2d 125 (2000); see also Cone v. Longmont United Hosp.
discussed
Cited "see"
Tungol v. Certainteed Corp.
(2×)
See Stone v. Autoliv ASP, Inc., 210 F.3d 1132, 1140 (10th Cir.), cert. denied 531 U.S. 876 , 121 S.Ct. 182 , 148 L.Ed.2d 125 (2000) (citation omitted). 34 .
cited
Cited "see"
Ginger Turner v. Jeri Holbrook
See Bennett v. Barnett, 210 F.3d 272, 274-76 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 875 , 121 S.Ct. 181 , 148 L.Ed.2d 125 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Turner v. Holbrook
See Bennett v. Barnett, 210 F.3d 272, 274-76 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 875 , 121 S.Ct. 181 , 148 L.Ed.2d 125 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robinson v. Baltimore City Police Dept.
See Hawkins v. PepsiCo, Inc., 203 F.3d 274, 278 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 875 , 121 S.Ct. 181 , 148 L.Ed.2d 125 , reh’g denied, 531 U.S. 1031 , 121 S.Ct. 613 , 148 L.Ed.2d 524 (2000), (citing McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chika v. Planning Research Corp.
See Hawkins v. PepsiCo, Inc., 203 F.3d 274, 278 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 875 , 121 S.Ct. 181 , 148 L.Ed.2d 125 , reh’g denied, 531 U.S. 1031 , 121 S.Ct. 613 , 148 L.Ed.2d 524 (2000), citing (McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bennett v. Emerson Electric Co.
(2×)
See Stone v. Autoliv ASP, Inc., 210 F.3d 1132, 1140-41 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 876 , 121 S.Ct. 182 , 148 L.Ed.2d 125 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
James H. Spriggs v. Diamond Auto Glass Richard A. Rutta Ernest Stickell
See Hawkins v. PepsiCo, Inc., 203 F.3d 274, 276-77 (4th Cir.) (citations omitted), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 121 S.Ct. 181 , 148 L.Ed.2d 125 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pinder v. Employment Development Department
Holdmeyer v. Dep’t of Agric, 146 Fed.Appx. 535 (2d Cir. 2005); see also Hawkins v. PepsiCo, Inc., 203 F.3d 274, 276 (4th Cir. 2000) (“[Plaintiff], however, has shown nothing more than a routine difference of opinion and personality conflict with her supervisor. [W]e refuse to transmute such ordinary workplace disagreements between individuals of different races into actionable race discrimination .... ”), cert denied, 531 U.S. 875 , 121 S.Ct. 181 , 148 L.Ed.2d 125 (2000); Rivas Rosado v. Radio Shack, Inc., 312 F.3d 532, 534 (1st Cir. 2002) (concluding the same is true in sex discriminati…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Saucier
(2×)
Such statements do not fall within the state of mind exception to the hearsay rule.” (Citations omitted.) Id., 595 ; see also State v. Adams, 52 Conn. App. 643, 656-57 , 727 A.2d 780 (1999) (trial court properly excluded, under both state of mind and residual exceptions, statements by defendant to police that he had stabbed victim in self-defense), aff'd, 252 Conn. 752 , 748 A.2d 872 , cert. denied, 531 U.S. 876 , 121 S. Ct. 182 , 148 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jadali v. Alamance Regional Medical Center
See, e.g., Hawkins v. PepsiCo, Inc., 203 F.3d 274, 281 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 875 , 121 S.Ct. 181 , 148 L.Ed.2d 125 (2000) (discussing this concept in relation to Title VII).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Spriggs v. Public Service Com'n of Maryland
Karpel, 134 F.3d at 1229 ; see also Hawkins v. PepsiCo, Inc., 203 F.3d 274, 280 (4th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 875 , 121 S.Ct. 181 , 148 L.Ed.2d 125 (2000) (finding that a plaintiff in an employment discrimination case must show that the employer’s reasons for taking an employment action were dishonest or pretextual, not just dispute the merits of them).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bickford
v.
Anchorage School District Board of Education
v.
Anchorage School District Board of Education
No. 00-98.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 2000.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.