green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.7 score
“a charging document short of an indictment, such as a complaint, will suffice if it alone gives 'the court jurisdiction to proceed to trial”
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Butler
a charging document short of an indictment, such as a complaint, will suffice if it alone gives 'the court jurisdiction to proceed to trial
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Stuc-O-Flex International, Inc. v. Low and Bonar, Inc.
Moreover, a party “need not use particular words to 22 plead in the alternative” if “it can be reasonably inferred that this is what [it was] 23 doing.” Holman v. Indiana, 211 F.3d 399, 407 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 880 24 (2000); see also G-I Holdings, Inc. v. Baron & Budd, 238 F. Supp. 2d 521 , 536 25 (S.D.N.Y. 2002); Pair–A–Dice Acquisition Partners, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of the 26 Galveston Wharves, 185 F.Supp.2d 703 , 708 n. 6 (S.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Berry
(2×)
See United States v. Blair, 214 F.3d 690, 702 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 880 , 121 S.Ct. 191 , 148 L.Ed.2d 132 (2000); United States v. Bingham, 81 F.3d 617, 630-31 (6th Cir.1996) (equal protection); United States v. Hill, 79 F.3d 1477, 1488-89 (6th Cir.1996) (Eighth Amendment and equal protection); United States v. Pickett, 941 F.2d 411, 418-19 (6th Cir.1991) (Eighth Amendment and substantive due process).
discussed
Cited "see"
Teague v. Palmateer
See United States v. Mandanici, 205 F.3d 519, 529 (2d Cir.2000), cert. den., 531 U.S. 879 , 121 S.Ct. 190 , 148 L.Ed.2d 132 (2000), and cert. den., ___ U.S. ___, 122 S.Ct. 2666 , 153 L.Ed.2d 840 (2002) (summarizing cases).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Estrada-Beltran
See United States v. Ocana, 204 F.3d 585, 593 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 880 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Heath v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
(2×)
See Holman v. Indiana, 211 F.3d 399, 402 (7th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 880 , 121 S.Ct. 191 , 148 L.Ed.2d 132 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. Tires Products
(2×)
See Holman v. Indiana, 211 F.3d 399, 402 (7th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 880 , 121 S.Ct. 191 , 148 L.Ed.2d 132 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lang
See United States v. Mandanici, 205 F.3d 519, 529-30 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 879 , 121 S.Ct. 190 , 148 L.Ed.2d 132 (2000); United States v. Swindall, 107 F.3d 831, 836 (11th Cir.1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnson
See United States v. Mandanici, 205 F.3d 519 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 121 S.Ct. 190 , 148 L.Ed.2d 132 (2000); Bilzerian v. United States, 127 F.3d 237 (2nd Cir.1997), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1021 , 119 S.Ct. 2365 , 144 L.Ed.2d 770 (1999); United States v. Shunk, 113 F.3d 31 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Swindall, 107 F.3d 831 (11th Cir.1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tillery v. Leonard & Sciolla, LLP
Subjective determinations such as bad faith are “singularly inappropriate for determination on summary judgment.” Suisman, Shapiro v. Suisman, 2006 WL [387289] at *9, quoting Cadbury Beverages v. Cott Corp., 73 F.3d 474, 483 (2d Cir.1996); see also U.S. ex rel Cantekin v. Univ. of Pittsburgh, 192 F.3d 402 (3d Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 880 , 121 S.Ct. 192 , 148 L.Ed.2d 133 (2000) (defendant’s state of mind typically should not be decided on summary judgment).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wright v. United States
Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 310 , 109 S.Ct. 1060 , 103 L.Ed.2d 334 (1989); see also United States v. Mandanici, 205 F.3d 519, 525 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 879 , 121 S.Ct. 190 , 148 L.Ed.2d 132 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Darius M. Moss
See, e.g., United States v. Mandanici, 205 F.3d 519, 529 (2d Cir.) (describing eleven cases since Teague where the Supreme Court has addressed new rules or proposed new rules and refused to apply those rules retroactively under the watershed exception), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 879 , 121 S.Ct. 190 , 148 L.Ed.2d 132 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Monsanto v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Mandanici, 205 F.3d 519, 525 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 121 S.Ct. 190 , 148 L.Ed.2d 132 (2000) (stating that “a new rule of substantive criminal law is presumptively retroactive because a defendant may have been ‘punished for conduct that simply is not illegal’ ” (quoting Bilzerian v. United States, 127 F.3d 237, 242 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1021 , 119 S.Ct. 2365 , 144 L.Ed.2d 770 (1999))). *278 In Davis v. United States, the Supreme Court held that, in determining whether a new substantive decision is to be applied retroactively, “th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Moore
See Jones v. Smith, 231 F.3d 1227, 1237-38 (9th Cir.2000); see also United States v. Mandanici, 205 F.3d 519 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 121 S.Ct. 190 , 148 L.Ed.2d 132 (2000) (non-Apprendi case); Ware v. United States, 124 F.Supp.2d 590 (M.D.Tenn.2000) (Apprendi); United States v. Johnson, 126 F.Supp.2d 1222 (D.Neb. 2000); United States v. Joseph, 2000 WL 1789989 (E.D.La.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Klein v. United States
See also United States v. Mandanici, 205 F.3d 519 (2nd Cir.2000) cert. denied Mandanici v. United States, U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 190 , 148 L.Ed.2d 132 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mack
v.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
v.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
No. 00-225.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 2000.
Published
Citer courts: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial… (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.