green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Melayne R. Danekas
See United States v. Berry, 212 F.3d 391, 394-95 (8th Cir.) (“common scheme or plan” under U.S.S.G. § lB1.3(a)(l)(A) (relevant conduct) is defined more broadly than “single common scheme or plan” under § 4A1.2(a)(2) (emphasis added)), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 907 , 121 S.Ct. 253 , 148 L.Ed.2d 183 (2000); Maza, 93 F.3d at 1399-1400 (prior convictions for selling cocaine were unrelated, in part because sales took place in different states); United States v. Garcia, 962 F.2d 479, 482 (5th Cir.) (two distinct, separate drug deliveries were not part of common scheme even though crimes were …
cited
Cited "see"
Reyna v. State
See Bird v. State, 901 P.2d 1123, 1128-30 (Wyo.1995), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 907 , 121 S.Ct. 253 , 148 L.Ed.2d 183 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Freddy Leon Wildman v. Dan Johnson
See Dows v. Wood, 211 F.3d 480, 482 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 908 , 121 S.Ct. 254 , 148 L.Ed.2d 183 (2000).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas v. State
See also, Bird v. State, 901 P.2d 1123, 1128 (Wyo.1995), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 907 , 121 S.Ct. 253 , 148 L.Ed.2d 183 (2000); Smallwood v. State, 748 P.2d 1141, 1143 (Wyo.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Godin
Compare United States v. Berry, 212 F.3d 391, 393-95 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 907 , 121 S.Ct. 253 , 148 L.Ed.2d 183 (2000), United States v. Brown, 209 F.3d 1020 , 1024 n. 9 (7th Cir.2000), and United States v. Beckett, 208 F.3d 140 , 147 n. 2 (3d Cir.2000), with United States v. LaBarbara, 129 F.3d 81, 86 (2d Cir.1997), and United States v. Mullens, 65 F.3d 1560, 1565 (11th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1112 , 116 S.Ct. 1337 , 134 L.Ed.2d 487 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burdine v. Johnson
See also Dows v. Wood, 211 F.3d 480, 485-86 (9th Cir.) (state court’s refusal of presumed-prejudice where counsel was allegedly suffering at trial from effects of Alzheimer’s disease was neither contrary to, nor involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law under AEDPA), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 908 , 121 S.Ct. 254 , 148 L.Ed.2d 183 (2000). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Juvenile Male (E. W. E.)
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 00-5512.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 2000.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.