green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.6 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
David P. Miller v. State
except for complaints involving fundamental constitutional systemic requirements which are not applicable here, all other complaints based on a violation of both constitutional and statutory rights are waived by failure to comply with rule 33.1.
cited
Cited "see"
Ramiro Ibarra v. Lorie Davis, Director
See Ibarra v. State of Texas, 11 S.W.3d 189 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), reh’g denied (Dec. 8, 1999), cert. denied, Rubi Ibarra v. Texas, 531 U.S. 828 , 121 S. Ct. 79 , 148 L.Ed.2d 41 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Ramiro Ibarra v. Lorie Davis, Director
See Ibarra v. State of Texas, 11 S.W.3d 189 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), reh'g denied (Dec. 8, 1999), cert. denied, Rubi Ibarra v. Texas, 531 U.S. 828 , 121 S.Ct. 79 , 148 L.Ed.2d 41 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Ramiro Ibarra v. Rick Thaler, Director
See Ibarra v. State of Texas, 11 S.W.3d 189 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), reh’g denied (Dec. 8, 1999), cert. denied, Rubi Ibarra v. Texas, 531 U.S. 828 , 121 S.Ct. 79 , 148 L.Ed.2d 41 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
the City of Houston v. Larry Edgar Estrada and Mayer Brown, L.L.P., F/K/A Mayer Brown, Rowe & Maw, L.L.P.
See id. _ 552.001(a), (b).
discussed
Cited "see"
Swartz v. KPMG, LLC
(2×)
See Howard v. America Online Inc., 208 F.3d 741, 749-50 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 828 , 121 S.Ct. 77 , 148 L.Ed.2d 40 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Karnes v. State
See Ibarra v. State, 11 S.W.3d 189, 197 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), cer t. denied, 531 U.S. 828 , 121 S.Ct. 79 , 148 L.Ed.2d 41 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Ray v. State
See Ibarra v. State, 11 S.W.3d 189, 197 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 828 , 121 S.Ct. 79 , 148 L.Ed.2d 41 (2000); Tex.R.App.
cited
Cited "see"
Guevara v. State
See Ibarra v. State, 11 S.W.3d 189, 197 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), ce rt. denied, 531 U.S. 828 , 121 S.Ct. 79 , 148 L.Ed.2d 41 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Qwest Communications Corp. v. City of Berkeley
(2×)
See Howard v. America Online, Inc., 208 F.3d 741, 751-53 (9th Cir.2000), cert, denied 531 U.S. 828 , 121 S.Ct. 77 , 148 L.Ed.2d 40 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Wieghat v. State
See Ibarra v. State, 11 S.W.3d 189, 197 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), cert, denied, 531 U.S. 828 , 121 S.Ct. 79 , 148 L.Ed.2d 41 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary D. Bollin, United States of America v. Ernst N. Tietjen, United States of America v. James Gormley
(2×)
Id. at 670 ; accord United States v. Dieter, 198 F.3d 1284 , 1290 (11th Cir.1999) (holding that 21 U.S.C. § 853 (a) applies “irrespective of any provision of state law”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 828 , 121 S.Ct. 77 , 148 L.Ed.2d 40 (2000); United States v. 18755 North Bay Road, 13 F.3d 1493 , 1498 (11th Cir.1994) (holding that federal forfeiture law preempts the Florida homestead exemption); United States v. Curtis, 965 F.2d 610, 616 (8th Cir.1992) (holding that § 853(a) supersedes the Iowa homestead exemption); see also United States v. Rodgers, 461 U.S. 677 , 103 S.Ct. 2132 , 76 L.Ed.2d …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cruze v. Hudler
See, e.g., Howard v. America Online, Inc., 208 F3d 741, 749 (9th Cir 2000), cert den, 531 US 828 (2002) (holding that securities fraud cannot be used to establish a racketeering violation under federal law).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Javitch v. First Montauk Financial Corp.
(2×)
See also, Howard v. America Online, Inc., 208 F.3d 741 (9th Cm.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 828 , 121 S.Ct. 77 , 148 L.Ed.2d 40 (2000) (precluding RICO action where claims implicate conduct which could have been actionable securities fraud despite claimants’ lack of standing to assert those claims); Jordan (Bermuda) Inv.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mustafa Abdullah v. United States
See, e.g., Petty v. Card, 195 F.3d 399, 400 (8th Cir.1999) (holding that an argument not raised before the district court is procedurally defaulted), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 78 , 148 L.Ed.2d 40 (2000); United States v. Lawson, 155 F.3d 980, 982 (8th Cir.1998) (“[Ijssues not presented to the district court will not be considered on appeal unless a finding of waiver would be unfair or unjust.”), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1186 , 119 S.Ct. 1131 , 143 L.Ed.2d 124 (1999); Devose v. Norris, 53 F.3d 201, 207 (8th Cir.1995) (holding that habeas claim not included in petition and never rais…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chmura, Judge, 37th District Court of Michigan
v.
Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission
v.
Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission
No. 99-2086.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 2000.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Texas (1)
Sup. Ct. Mich. Certiorari denied.